Advanced Search Results

Jagannath Das Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 1(3); Pharmacy (Amendment) Act, 1959

Reported in : AIR1968Ori176; 34(1968)CLT594

State Pharmacy Councils), Chapter IV (Sections 29-4D Registration of Pharmacists) and Chapter V (Sections 41-46 Miscellaneous) of the Pharmacy Act. 1948 (Central Act VIII of 1948) as the Act stood before its amendment by the Pharmacy (Amendment) Act, 1959 … was also made to similar provisions in other statutes including the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1954 (Act LTV of 1948). Section 1 (3) and (4) of that Aet so far as material, provides as follows:'1. x x x x

Mahesh Chandra Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16, 17, 29, 30, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 41; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(1), 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 8 to 16 and 16(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 101(3) and 220(3); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 4, 36 and 38; Advocates (Amendment) Act, 1976; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947; Dentists Act, 1948; Chartered Accountants Act, 1949; Pharmacy Act, 1948; High Court Rules - Rules 10, 14 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 124, 124(3), 136, 138, 138(2), 145(1), 217, 217(1), 217(2), 224, 224(1), 226, 233, 233(2) and 246

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC199; 2009(9)SCALE206; (2009)8SCC273; 2009(3)SLJ385(SC); 2009(7)LC3083(SC); [2009] 10 SCR 921

1956, the Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947, the Dentists Act, 1948, the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the Pharmacy Act, 1948, all Central Acts, would fall under the power to deal with professions under entry 26 of List III … or Vakil on the roll of any High Court under the Letters Patent constituting such Court, or under Section 41 of this Act, or enrolled as a pleader in the Chief Court of the Punjab under Section 8

Indian Pharmaceutical Association and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and or ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

appreciate the controversy raised in the present writ petition, a careful analysis of the relevant provisions of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (in short, 'the Pharmacy Act') is imperative. With this end in view, let me, point out, the object … personal supervision of, a registered pharmacist.5. A careful reading, as a whole, of the Pharmacy Act shows that Section 3 empowers the Central Government to constitute, as soon as may be, a Pharmacy Council of India, which … Regulations have by or under Section 11, taken effect in the State, 41 [a person who has attained the age of eighteen years shall on

Aishat Shifa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

parity with the facts of the present case. The Pharmacy Council of India, an authority created under the Pharmacy Act, 1948, resolved on 17.7.2019 to put a moratorium on the opening of new pharmacy colleges for running Diploma as … promoting literacy 23 and education as mandated under Articles 21, 21A, 39(f), 41, 46 and 51A of the Constitution?. (xi) Whether the Government Order neither … in the above at reference No.1, the Karnataka Education Act 1983 passed by the Government of Karnataka (1-1995) Section [7(2)(g)(v)].* stipulates that all the school students studying in Karnataka should behave in a fraternal manner, transcend their

Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Vs. A.P. Verma and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contempt of CourtConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 142; Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics), Regulations, 2002; Contempt of Court Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 12; Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act, 1954

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC967; 2005(2)ESC857

health. A physician should observe the provisions of the State Acts like Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 ; Pharmacy Act, 1948 ; Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ; Medical Termination of. Pregnancy Act, 1971 ; Transplantation of … to the legal provisions for taking appropriate action against such persons. In this letter attention was drawn to Section 15 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Section 17 of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, … for effectively complying with Order of Supreme Court. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 &

Pharmacy Council of India vs Sls College of Pharmacy

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

14.12.2023 stipulated that allinstitutions that are already approved for the conduct of course/approved under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act, 1948’) for B.Pharm/D.Pharm/M.Pharm/Pharm D/Pharm D (PB)/B.Pharm (Practice) have to mandatorily apply, submitting … OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIJudgment reserved on: 07.04.2026% Judgment delivered on: 29.05.2026 + LPA 614/2024, CM APPLs. 40079/2024, 4139/2025, 48276/2025 and 68686/2025 PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA ....Appellant Through: Mr. Vinay Garg, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar

Mahesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Directorate of Education and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2) and 12(3); Education Regulation, 1991 - Regulations 10 to 13 and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT509; 2007(96)DRJ589

inspection of D. Pharma course for granting approval of the D. Pharma course under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 for the purpose of registration as a pharmacist. It will be the responsibility of the institution to obtain … The petitioners are not entitled for any of the relief in the facts and circumstances of these cases. 41. The writ petitions are, thereforee, without any merit and are dismissed. Parties are left to bear their own

Jasoria Medical Store and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rules 64 and 65(15); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940

Reported in : RLW2004(4)Raj2083; 2004(3)WLC626

contemplated under the act or the rules. With regard to the exercising power under Section 42 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 the respondents issued a circular dated 2.3.95.18. Learned counsel for the petitioners also referred Section 42 of the … contrary the requirement is of strict compliance of the statutory provisions of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. 41. In view of the aforesaid discussions all the writ petitions fail and the same are dismissed with no

Sona Ana Pana Baulraj Alias Subbiah Nadar and anr. Vs. S.P. Vadivelu N ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Reported in : (1964)1MLJ121

the Old Act are' not legal proceedings. He relied on the decision in Ram Rakhapal v. Amrit Dhara Pharmacy : AIR1957All683 in support of his contention. But a contrary view has been taken in Zenith Colour Trading … Trade Marks Act of 1940 came into force. Subsequently on 3rd May, 1948, he applied to the Registrar of Trade Marks at Bombay under the … Ch. 92 the phrase ' in all legal proceedings relating to a registered trade mark ' contained in Section 41 of the Trade Marks Act, 1905, of England has been construed. It should be noted that Section 41

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9), 2(13), 2(17), 39, 44, 45A, 75 and 90; Apprentices Act, 1961; Factories Act, 1948

Reported in : 152(2008)DLT268; 2008(104)DRJ361; [2008(119)FLR184]

casual employment, casually made for a casual work. In the decision reported as ESIC v. Ayurvedic Industrial Cooperative Pharmacy 1980 (40) FLR 409, it was noted that there may be engagements which may not amount to service. … order dated 30.01.2003 dismissing two petitions filed by the appellant under Section 75 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948. In the petition filed before the learned Judge ESI Court which is the subject matter of FAO No. … Court in Superintendent of Post Ofiices v. P.K. Rajamma 1977 2 L.L.N. 41. 26. The facts in Subhash Chandra Bose's case (supra) were that Calcutta