Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: pharmacy act 1948 section 36 · Page 1 of about 156 results (0.030 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 06 2012

Rajendra Prasad Bagaria Vs. Pharmacy Council of State of Raj. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-06-2012

Subject : Education

Acts : The Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Section 32, 36(4), 30, 31, 33

of the State of Rajasthan (respondent No.1 herein - `Rajasthan Council' for short) under Section 32 of The Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act'). 4. It is the further case of the appellant that the Rajasthan … his name should not be removed from the Register of Pharmacists of Rajasthan by invoking its powers under Section 36 of the Act. The appellant did not care either to reply, or to remain present before the Executive

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2006

Shri Brijesh Sharma Vs. the Liquidator, Super Bazar, the Co-operative ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 29, 31 to 32A, 32B, 32B(2) and 36; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Pharmacy (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Article 226; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1948 - Rule 65(1), 65(15) and 65(5)(15)

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ497

3.5.1978 by the Delhi Pharmacy Council as per Form-F under Rule 65(1) read with Section 32B of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereafter 'the Act') as amended, in 1976.4. On 3.3.2000, a charge sheet was issued to the petitioner alleging … in mind is that the Pharmacy Council has to follow the procedure prescribed under the Pharmacy Act under Section 36 to remove any member's name from the register. Nothing on record suggests that such procedure was followed.21. I

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2009

Mahesh Chandra Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-06-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 16, 17, 29, 30, 35, 36, 37, 38 and 41; Indian Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(1), 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 8 to 16 and 16(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 101(3) and 220(3); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Legal Practitioners Act, 1879 - Sections 4, 36 and 38; Advocates (Amendment) Act, 1976; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947; Dentists Act, 1948; Chartered Accountants Act, 1949; Pharmacy Act, 1948; High Court Rules - Rules 10, 14 and 15; Constitution of India - Articles 124, 124(3), 136, 138, 138(2), 145(1), 217, 217(1), 217(2), 224, 224(1), 226, 233, 233(2) and 246

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC199; 2009(9)SCALE206; (2009)8SCC273; 2009(3)SLJ385(SC); 2009(7)LC3083(SC); [2009] 10 SCR 921

1956, the Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947, the Dentists Act, 1948, the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the Pharmacy Act, 1948, all Central Acts, would fall under the power to deal with professions under entry 26 of List III … Courts subordinate to this Court. But Section 38, Legal Practitioners Act, provides that nothing in that Act, except Section 36, shall apply to persons enrolled as advocates of any High Court under the Bar Councils Act, 1926. From

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 26 2007

Mahesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Directorate of Education and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-26-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2) and 12(3); Education Regulation, 1991 - Regulations 10 to 13 and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT509; 2007(96)DRJ589

inspection of D. Pharma course for granting approval of the D. Pharma course under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 for the purpose of registration as a pharmacist. It will be the responsibility of the institution to obtain … 2 to approve the respondent No. 1 as the examination authority as has been claimed by the petitioners. 36. Consequently the petitioners are not entitled for any directions to the respondent No. 2 to approve the respondent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 2022

Aishat Shifa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-13-2022

Subject : Education

parity with the facts of the present case. The Pharmacy Council of India, an authority created under the Pharmacy Act, 1948, resolved on 17.7.2019 to put a moratorium on the opening of new pharmacy colleges for running Diploma as … the Act and includes one deemed to be recognized thereunder. The recognition of educational institutions is contemplated by Section 36 of the Act whereas the educational institutions established and run by the State Government or by the authority

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1989

Gulshan Kumar and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-28-1989

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Punjab Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 11, 14, 30, 30(2), 31, 32, 34, 36 and 46; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1990P& H74

the instructions. As per item No. 4 of these instructions henceforth, as per the provisions of the Punjab Pharmacy Act, 1948 as it stands presently the only persons who have passed matric or its equivalent examination are eligible for … name of the petitioners from their register, if such certificate is found to be incorrect, as required under Section 36 of the Act. Though this argument on the face of it appears to be plausible, yet the same

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 2001

G. Lakshmana Rao Vs. District Collector-chairman, Selection Committee ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-02-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act - Sections 19; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 15A and 42; Constitution of India - Article 14; Andhra Pradesh Medical Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 2 and 5

Reported in : 2002(5)ALT208

she had a first class diploma in pharmacy. She had been registered in A.P. Pharmacy Council under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 with certificate No. 15105 dated 17-12-1987. She had also registered her name with the Employment Exchange at Kakinada. … completed 18 years of age as on 1-7-98, but should not cross 36 years. Along with pass in Intermediate, must have Diploma in Pharmacy in … Bilal Nazki, J. 1. Respondent No. 4 herein filed an application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad. She sought setting aside

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2026

Pharmacy Council of India vs Sls College of Pharmacy

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Education

14.12.2023 stipulated that allinstitutions that are already approved for the conduct of course/approved under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act, 1948’) for B.Pharm/D.Pharm/M.Pharm/Pharm D/Pharm D (PB)/B.Pharm (Practice) have to mandatorily apply, submitting

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2004

Jasoria Medical Store and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-09-2004

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rules 64 and 65(15); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940

Reported in : RLW2004(4)Raj2083; 2004(3)WLC626

contemplated under the act or the rules. With regard to the exercising power under Section 42 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 the respondents issued a circular dated 2.3.95.18. Learned counsel for the petitioners also referred Section 42 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1994

Gita Arun Khaladkar and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-01-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 10; Education Regulation, 1991 - Regulation 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 226

Reported in : AIR1995Bom58; 1994(2)MhLj1889

petitioners are not entitled to seek admission to the Diploma Course in pharmacy. 3. Section 10 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 empowers the Central Council to make Regulation Order called the 'Education Regulations' subject to the approval of the … was invalidated subsequently Held, His appointment would not be protected. The observations/directions issued by Supreme Court in Para 36 of judgment in the case of State v Millind reported in 2001 91) Mah. LJ SC 1 is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial