Advanced Search Results

Rajendra Prasad Bagaria Vs. Pharmacy Council of State of Raj. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Acts : The Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Section 32, 36(4), 30, 31, 33

of the State of Rajasthan (respondent No.1 herein - `Rajasthan Council' for short) under Section 32 of The Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act'). 4. It is the further case of the appellant that the Rajasthan

Shri Brijesh Sharma Vs. the Liquidator, Super Bazar, the Co-operative ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 29, 31 to 32A, 32B, 32B(2) and 36; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Pharmacy (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Article 226; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1948 - Rule 65(1), 65(15) and 65(5)(15)

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ497

3.5.1978 by the Delhi Pharmacy Council as per Form-F under Rule 65(1) read with Section 32B of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereafter 'the Act') as amended, in 1976.4. On 3.3.2000, a charge sheet was issued to the petitioner alleging … qualification certificate and that the Delhi Pharmacy Council by its letter dated 28.4.1999 informed Super Bazar that under Section 32 of the Pharmacy Act, no person was entitled to be registered as a Pharmacist in the register unless

Gayatri Devi Pansari Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 32

Reported in : 2000(4)ALT60(SC); 90(2000)CLT439(SC); JT2000(4)SC600; 2000(3)SCALE210; (2000)4SCC221

right to run the Medical Store in question, particularly when she was entitled under Section 32 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 to get her name registered as Pharmacist by virtue of her having been registered as such in a

Pharmacy Council of India, New Delhi and anr. Vs. Smt. Archna Patwari ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 10, 11, 12, 32, 32(1) and 32(2)

Reported in : ILR2002KAR22; 2002(3)KarLJ178

writ of mandamus directing the second appellant herein to issue a certificate as a registered pharmacist under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Pharmacy Act').3. The writ petition was contested by the second appellant herein contending … per Section 11 of the Pharmacy Act and therefore the registration of names is to be as per Section 32 of the Pharmacy Act. The first respondent does not fulfil the conditions prescribed under the said section. The

Basavaraj M. and Others Vs. the Karnataka State Pharmacy Council, Bang ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 4, 10(3), (4) and (5), 11, 12, 12(1) and (2), 13, 14, 18, 30(2), 31 and 32; Education Regulation for Diploma Course in Pharmacy, 1991 - Regulations 2, 7and 9

Reported in : AIR2001Kant239

which they have written are not approved by this respondent as per Section 12(1) and (2) of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 and as such the petitions are liable to be dismissed with costs'.In paragraphs 5, 6 and 7, it … examination is also not approved by the 4th respondent are not entitled to be registered as Pharmacist under Section 32(2) of the Act'. It has further been stated,'As per the Regulation 9 of the Education Regulations, 1991, which

Mahesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Directorate of Education and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2) and 12(3); Education Regulation, 1991 - Regulations 10 to 13 and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT509; 2007(96)DRJ589

inspection of D. Pharma course for granting approval of the D. Pharma course under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 for the purpose of registration as a pharmacist. It will be the responsibility of the institution to obtain … to such institutions as if it were a University within the meaning of Clause (f) of Section 2. 32. Thus Section 3 provides that once a institution is declared as a 'deemed university' all the provisions of

Anil Dattatraya Ade Vs. Presiding Officer, School Tribunal,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 2, 2(20), 2(24) and 9; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1990; Pharmacy Act, 1948; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981; Constitution of India - Articles 245, 246, 254 and 254(1); Bombay Civil Services Rules

Reported in : 2003(3)BomCR465; 2003(2)MhLj316

apply to technicalinstitutions. Pharmacy institutions are not governed by theAct and the Rules as they are governed by Pharmacy Act, 1948,as well as by the All India Council for Technical EducationAct, 1987. The Tribunal, therefore, committed an error of … (Conditions ofService) Regulation Act, 1977? 1. Whether the amendment by Maharashtra Act 32 of 1990introduced on 6.12.1990 to the provisions of the said Act isdeclaratory … passed by the management, thepetitioner approached the School Tribunal, Amravati Region, byfiling Appeal No. 43 of 1984 under Section 9 of the Act. ThePresiding Officer of the School Tribunal vide an order datedJanuary 16, 1986 partly allowed

Shyam Babu Verma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 31 and 32; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : [1994(68)FLR812]; JT1994(1)SC574; (1994)ILLJ815SC; 1994(1)SCALE469; (1994)2SCC521; [1994]1SCR700; 1994(2)SLJ99(SC); 1994(1)LC797(SC); (1994)1UPLBEC521

were issued to the petitioners saying that at they were covered by Clause (d) Section 31 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'), their salary was being fixed in the scale of Rs. 330-480 instead … N.P. Singh, J.1. These petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution have been filed on behalf of the three petitioners questioning the validity of an order

Dina Nath Dhawan and anr. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Education

Acts : The Pharmacy Act 1948 - Sections 31(a), 31(b), 31(c), 31(d), 2, 32(2), 42, 34

petitioner was registered in the First Register of Pharmacists, under section 31 (a) (b), (c), (d) of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’ for brevity sake) on 28.8.1969. Thereafter the same was renewed for life … for the constitution and composition of State Councils. Chapter IV of the Act provides for registration of Pharmacists. Section 32 lays down the qualification for subsequent registration and section 33, in detail, provides for the scrutiny of applications

Indian Pharmaceutical Association and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and or ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

appreciate the controversy raised in the present writ petition, a careful analysis of the relevant provisions of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (in short, 'the Pharmacy Act') is imperative. With this end in view, let me, point out, the object … required in Section 31, subsequent registration of the pharmacists shall be governed in terms of the qualifications, which Section 32 perceives. This Section (Section 32), therefore, needs a closure scrutiny. On a careful scrutiny of Section 32, it