Advanced Search Results

Mahesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Directorate of Education and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2) and 12(3); Education Regulation, 1991 - Regulations 10 to 13 and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT509; 2007(96)DRJ589

inspection of D. Pharma course for granting approval of the D. Pharma course under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 for the purpose of registration as a pharmacist. It will be the responsibility of the institution to obtain … 2002, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Department of Secondary and Higher Education in exercise of power conferred under Section 3 of University Grants Commission Act, 1956 declared Institute of Advance Studies in Education of Gandhi Vidya Mandir, Sardarshahar,

B. Krishna Rao Vs. M. William Carey and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 10; University Grants Commission Act - Sections 3; Education Regulations, 1991; All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 3 and 10

Reported in : 2004(3)ALD222; 2004(3)ALT579

20.9.2000 on the ground that it was illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Education Regulations, 1991 framed under Pharmacy Act, 1948. The 1st respondent contended that he possesses Master of Pharmacy and was appointed as an Associate Lecturer which … universities established under a Central Act, a Provincial Act or a State Act have to be notified under Sub-section (3) of Section 22 through an Official Gazette. It may be worthwhile to mention that Sub-section (3) was added

Basavaraj M. and Others Vs. the Karnataka State Pharmacy Council, Bang ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 4, 10(3), (4) and (5), 11, 12, 12(1) and (2), 13, 14, 18, 30(2), 31 and 32; Education Regulation for Diploma Course in Pharmacy, 1991 - Regulations 2, 7and 9

Reported in : AIR2001Kant239

which they have written are not approved by this respondent as per Section 12(1) and (2) of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 and as such the petitions are liable to be dismissed with costs'.In paragraphs 5, 6 and 7, it … the learned Counsel for the petitioners, Sri R.H. Chandanagoudar and the learned Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3.2. By these petitions, the petitioners have sought the following reliefs.-(i) Quashing of the endorsements dated 16-9-1998 and 23-9-1998

Dr. Mukhtiar Chand and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 33; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2), 21, 25 and 27; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rule 2; Indian Medical Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 17(3), 22; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1 and 6); East Punjab Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 1949; Pepsu Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 2008 BK - Sections 16(3); Punjab Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 1963; The Indian Medical Degrees Act, 1916 - Sections 3; Indian Medical Council Act, 1933; The Homeopathic Central Council Act, 1973; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Bombay Medical Act, 1912 - Sections 7(3); Bihar and Orissa Medical Act, 1916; Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 1965; Uttar Pradesh Indian Medicine

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(SC)457; AIR1999SC468; JT1998(7)SC78; 1998(5)SCALE501; (1998)7SCC579; [1998]Supp2SCR143

dated April 9, 1960 with effect from 14.05.1960, defines the expression 'registered medical practitioner'.25. For purposes of the Pharmacy Act, 1948, the expression medical practitioner is defined by substituting Section 2(f) therein with effect from 01.05.1960. Section 2(f) of … posing serious threat to the health of the community. The amended definition of 'Drug' in Clause (b) of Section (3) in the Drugs Act is inclusive and comprehensive but it does not include 'Ayurvedic, Siddba or Unani' drug.

A. Mahesh, Vs. K.K. College of Pharmacy Rep. by Its Principal/Correspo ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 10, 12, 12(3), 13, 15, 15A and 15B, 19, 30, 31 and 31; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Article 372; Pharmacy Act, 1948

Reported in : 2003(4)CTC657

of Tamil Nadu and was recognised by the Pharmacy Council of India, New Delhi under the provisions of Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Pharmacy Act') to impart education in Bachelor of Pharmacy course. In view of … in which he is for the time being residing or carrying on his profession or business of pharmacy. Section 3 provides for Constitution and composition of Central Council. The said Council so constituted shall include a representative of

Jitendra NaraIn Gangwar and ors. Vs. U.P. Technical University at Luck ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Technical University Act, 2000 - Sections 19(1) and 29(1); Uttar Pradesh Technical University Ordinances - Ordinances 4.2, 4.3, 9.3 and 10.1; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 2; Pharmacy Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Articles 246 and 254(2)

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC3266

of grace marks, and as such there is clear cut discrimination. He further submits that the provisions of Pharmacy Act, 1948 after enforcement of All India Council For Technical Education Act, 1987, stand impliedly repealed under Article 372 of … a sub-committee or any person to whom the Examination Committee has delegated its power in this behalf under Sub-section (3), to debar an examinee from future examinations of the University, if in its or his opinion, such examinee

Shivraj Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Civil

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 10, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Education Regulations

Reported in : AIR2005Utr39

they got admission in the year 1998-99. They also completed apprentice training as required under Section 10 of Pharmacy Act, 1948. But Uttar Pradesh Pharmacy Council (respondent No. 3) is not registering the name of the petitioners on the

Jagannath Das Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 1(3); Pharmacy (Amendment) Act, 1959

Reported in : AIR1968Ori176; 34(1968)CLT594

State Pharmacy Councils), Chapter IV (Sections 29-4D Registration of Pharmacists) and Chapter V (Sections 41-46 Miscellaneous) of the Pharmacy Act. 1948 (Central Act VIII of 1948) as the Act stood before its amendment by the Pharmacy (Amendment) Act, 1959 … was also made to similar provisions in other statutes including the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1954 (Act LTV of 1948). Section 1 (3) and (4) of that Aet so far as material, provides as follows:'1. x x x x

Mahesh Jhajharia and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 12(1)

Reported in : AIR1999Raj56; 1999(2)WLC248

the Pharmacy Council of India (for short 'PCI') is concerned, it has referred to Section 12(1) of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 which states that any authority in a State which conducts Course of study for Pharmacists, has to apply … education system throughout the country for promotion of qualitative improvement of such education and other allied matters. While Section 3 of the Act provides for the establishment of the Council. Section 10 specifies the functions of the Council

Spark College of Pharmacy (Pci-3020) vs Pharmacy Council of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court of India.”2. The brief facts in the present case are that the respondent has beenestablished under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (“the Act”) to regulate the field of pharmacy education, institution and courses in the country.3. The affiliating university … Hence, the present petition.8. Mr. Sai Deepak, learned senior counsel, appearing for the respondentstates that in terms of Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Pharmacy Act of 1948, the respondent has framed regulations for granting the