Advanced Search Results

Rajasthan Pharmacy Council, Jaipur Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 22 and 26; General Clauses Act, 1997; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 16

Reported in : 2001(1)WLC722; 2001(2)WLN434

its president, Sri Ramesh Ojha, which is a body corporate within the meaning of Section 22 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948, having perpetual succession and a common seal with power to acquire or hold property both moveable and immovable

Rajasthan Pharmacy Council Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Pharmacy Council Act, 1948 - Sections 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 46 and 46(2); Punjab Municipal Act - Sections 238(1); Bihar Service Code - Rule 73(F); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Rajasthan General Clauses Act - Sections 15 and 16; Rajasthan Service Rules - Rule 164-A

Reported in : 2001(3)WLC540

decision is not applicable and does not help any aid in advancing any case.(11). Chapter III of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (for short, 'Pharmacy Act') covers Sections-19 to 28. Section 19 deals with constitution and composition of State Council … shall serve the needs of the other participating States. Section 21 contemplates for composition of Joint State Councils. Section 22 provides for incorporation of State Councils and according to which every State Council shall be a body corporate

Mahesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Directorate of Education and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2) and 12(3); Education Regulation, 1991 - Regulations 10 to 13 and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT509; 2007(96)DRJ589

inspection of D. Pharma course for granting approval of the D. Pharma course under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 for the purpose of registration as a pharmacist. It will be the responsibility of the institution to obtain … review petition being RP No. 269-2005 was also filed on 26th September, 2005 for review of order dated 22nd August, 2005 which was also dismissed on 20th February, 2006. While dismissing the review petition, the Court had

Anil Dattatraya Ade Vs. Presiding Officer, School Tribunal,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 2, 2(20), 2(24) and 9; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1990; Pharmacy Act, 1948; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981; Constitution of India - Articles 245, 246, 254 and 254(1); Bombay Civil Services Rules

Reported in : 2003(3)BomCR465; 2003(2)MhLj316

apply to technicalinstitutions. Pharmacy institutions are not governed by theAct and the Rules as they are governed by Pharmacy Act, 1948,as well as by the All India Council for Technical EducationAct, 1987. The Tribunal, therefore, committed an error of … it was tocome to an end on June 30, 1983. On April 22, 1983, i.e.before about two months of completion of period of probation,the Principal … passed by the management, thepetitioner approached the School Tribunal, Amravati Region, byfiling Appeal No. 43 of 1984 under Section 9 of the Act. ThePresiding Officer of the School Tribunal vide an order datedJanuary 16, 1986 partly allowed

G. Lakshmana Rao Vs. District Collector-chairman, Selection Committee ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act - Sections 19; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 15A and 42; Constitution of India - Article 14; Andhra Pradesh Medical Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 2 and 5

Reported in : 2002(5)ALT208

she had a first class diploma in pharmacy. She had been registered in A.P. Pharmacy Council under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 with certificate No. 15105 dated 17-12-1987. She had also registered her name with the Employment Exchange at Kakinada. … Bilal Nazki, J. 1. Respondent No. 4 herein filed an application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad. She sought setting aside … dated 29-7-95. She was issued a hall ticket. Examination was conducted on 22-8-95. She appeared in the Examination. She was confident of having secured good

Indian Pharmaceutical Association and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and or ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

appreciate the controversy raised in the present writ petition, a careful analysis of the relevant provisions of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (in short, 'the Pharmacy Act') is imperative. With this end in view, let me, point out, the object … personal supervision of, a registered pharmacist.5. A careful reading, as a whole, of the Pharmacy Act shows that Section 3 empowers the Central Government to constitute, as soon as may be, a Pharmacy Council of India, which … In the present case, the Government of Tripura issued a Notification, on 22.02.1993, giving effect to the Education Regulations, 1991, with effect from the academic

Dr. Mukhtiar Chand and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 33; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2), 21, 25 and 27; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rule 2; Indian Medical Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 17(3), 22; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1 and 6); East Punjab Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 1949; Pepsu Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 2008 BK - Sections 16(3); Punjab Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 1963; The Indian Medical Degrees Act, 1916 - Sections 3; Indian Medical Council Act, 1933; The Homeopathic Central Council Act, 1973; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Bombay Medical Act, 1912 - Sections 7(3); Bihar and Orissa Medical Act, 1916; Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 1965; Uttar Pradesh Indian Medicine

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(SC)457; AIR1999SC468; JT1998(7)SC78; 1998(5)SCALE501; (1998)7SCC579; [1998]Supp2SCR143

dated April 9, 1960 with effect from 14.05.1960, defines the expression 'registered medical practitioner'.25. For purposes of the Pharmacy Act, 1948, the expression medical practitioner is defined by substituting Section 2(f) therein with effect from 01.05.1960. Section 2(f) of … a holder of degree in integrated medicine is entitled to be enrolled Under Section 17 of 1970 Act. Section 22 authorises the Central Council to prescribe the minimum standards of education in Indian medicine required for granting recognized

Pharmacy Council of India vs Sls College of Pharmacy

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

14.12.2023 stipulated that allinstitutions that are already approved for the conduct of course/approved under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act, 1948’) for B.Pharm/D.Pharm/M.Pharm/Pharm D/Pharm D (PB)/B.Pharm (Practice) have to mandatorily apply, submitting … Pharmacy Institutions to obtain yearly continuation of approval. We may also note that the submission onLPA 614/2024 Page 22 of 24 behalf of the appellant-PCI to defend the provisions which are under challenge before the learned Single

M/S Mallikarjuna Medical and Genemral Stor Vs. Assistant Directo, Sale ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

a person who is registered as a Pharmacist as defined in Clause (i) of Section 2 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948. It was observed by the Inspector that there was no Registered Pharmacist (RP) present at the shop supervising … thinks fit having the prescribed qualifications to be Inspectors for such areas as may be assigned to them. Section 22 of the act empowered the Inspector to inspect any premises wherein any drug or cosmetic is being sold

Subhasis Bakshi and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; ;Bengal Medical Act, 1914 - Sections 15, 18 and 20; ;Bengal Medical Act, 1915; ;Paschim Banga Ayurvedic System of Medicine Act, 1961; ;Paschim Banga Unani System of Medicine Act, 1979

Reported in : (1993)1CALLT272(HC)

can prescribe this medicine is a logical argument by Mr. Chatterjee. Next the learned Advocate referred to the Pharmacy Act, 1948 wherein by virtue of Section 42 the prescriptions of the petitioners would not be honoured and served by … Paschim, Banga Ayurvedic System of Medicine Act, 1961 which provides to regulate the teaching and practice thereof. Section 22(2) of the Act of 1961 provides that if any person produces proof that he has been in regular