Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: pharmacy act 1948 section 21 · Page 1 of about 224 results (0.045 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 08 1998

Dr. Mukhtiar Chand and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-08-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 33; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2), 21, 25 and 27; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rule 2; Indian Medical Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 17(3), 22; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1 and 6); East Punjab Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 1949; Pepsu Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 2008 BK - Sections 16(3); Punjab Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 1963; The Indian Medical Degrees Act, 1916 - Sections 3; Indian Medical Council Act, 1933; The Homeopathic Central Council Act, 1973; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Bombay Medical Act, 1912 - Sections 7(3); Bihar and Orissa Medical Act, 1916; Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 1965; Uttar Pradesh Indian Medicine

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(SC)457; AIR1999SC468; JT1998(7)SC78; 1998(5)SCALE501; (1998)7SCC579; [1998]Supp2SCR143

dated April 9, 1960 with effect from 14.05.1960, defines the expression 'registered medical practitioner'.25. For purposes of the Pharmacy Act, 1948, the expression medical practitioner is defined by substituting Section 2(f) therein with effect from 01.05.1960. Section 2(f) of … third category of registration is in the Indian Medical Register, which the Council is enjoined to maintain Under Section 21 for which recognised medical qualification is a prerequisite. The privileges of persons who are enrolled on the Indian

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2004

Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Vs. A.P. Verma and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-28-2004

Subject : Contempt of CourtConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 142; Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics), Regulations, 2002; Contempt of Court Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 12; Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act, 1954

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC967; 2005(2)ESC857

health. A physician should observe the provisions of the State Acts like Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 ; Pharmacy Act, 1948 ; Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ; Medical Termination of. Pregnancy Act, 1971 ; Transplantation of … to the legal provisions for taking appropriate action against such persons. In this letter attention was drawn to Section 15 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Section 17 of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, … Petition No. 820 of 2002. Notices were issued by this Court on 21.3.2002 to the respondents namely, the Chief Secretary, Government of U.P., Secretary, Department

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 2001

Rajasthan Pharmacy Council Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-04-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Pharmacy Council Act, 1948 - Sections 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 46 and 46(2); Punjab Municipal Act - Sections 238(1); Bihar Service Code - Rule 73(F); Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Rajasthan General Clauses Act - Sections 15 and 16; Rajasthan Service Rules - Rule 164-A

Reported in : 2001(3)WLC540

decision is not applicable and does not help any aid in advancing any case.(11). Chapter III of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (for short, 'Pharmacy Act') covers Sections-19 to 28. Section 19 deals with constitution and composition of State Council … or (b) that the State Council of one State shall serve the needs of the other participating States. Section 21 contemplates for composition of Joint State Councils. Section 22 provides for incorporation of State Councils and according to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 29 2026

Pharmacy Council of India vs Sls College of Pharmacy

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Education

14.12.2023 stipulated that allinstitutions that are already approved for the conduct of course/approved under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act, 1948’) for B.Pharm/D.Pharm/M.Pharm/Pharm D/Pharm D (PB)/B.Pharm (Practice) have to mandatorily apply, submitting … in the Official Gazette. Learned Single Judge has also opined that publication in the Official GazetteLPA 614/2024 Page 21 of 24 in itself is an indicator that the approval which is granted to a ‘Course of Study’

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2003

Jitendra NaraIn Gangwar and ors. Vs. U.P. Technical University at Luck ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-01-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Technical University Act, 2000 - Sections 19(1) and 29(1); Uttar Pradesh Technical University Ordinances - Ordinances 4.2, 4.3, 9.3 and 10.1; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 2; Pharmacy Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Articles 246 and 254(2)

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC3266

of grace marks, and as such there is clear cut discrimination. He further submits that the provisions of Pharmacy Act, 1948 after enforcement of All India Council For Technical Education Act, 1987, stand impliedly repealed under Article 372 of … Technical University in the State for the advancement and development of Technical education and other matters connected therewith. Sections 6, 14, 19, 21, 29 and 30 of the said Act being relevant are quoted below :'6. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2026

Spark College of Pharmacy (Pci-3020) vs Pharmacy Council of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-13-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court of India.”2. The brief facts in the present case are that the respondent has beenestablished under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (“the Act”) to regulate the field of pharmacy education, institution and courses in the country.3. The affiliating university … Hence, the present petition.8. Mr. Sai Deepak, learned senior counsel, appearing for the respondentstates that in terms of Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Pharmacy Act of 1948, the respondent has framed regulations for granting the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2026

Rps College of Pharmacy vs Pharmacy Council of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-27-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

and connected matters.5. The brief facts in the present case are that the respondent has beenestablished under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (“the Act”) to regulate the field of pharmacy education, institution and courses in the country. The affiliating university … said courses.9. Hence, the present petition.10. Mr. Singh, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent states that interms of Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Pharmacy Act of 1948, the respondent has framed regulations for granting the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2026

Baba Paras Nath College of Pharmacy and Paramedical Sciences (Pci-8269 ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-13-2026

Subject : Education

and connected matters.5. The brief facts in the present case are that the respondent has beenestablished under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (“the Act”) to regulate the field of pharmacy education, institution and courses in the country. The affiliating university … said courses.9. Hence, the present petition.10. Mr. Singh, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent states that interms of Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Pharmacy Act of 1948, the respondent has framed regulations for granting the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2026

Baba Ramdal Surajdev Pharmacy College vs Pharmacy Council of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-06-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

. .”2. The brief facts in the present case are that the respondent has been established under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (“the Act”) to regulate the field of pharmacy education, institution and courses in the country.3. The affiliating university … said pharmacy courses.7. Hence, the present petition.8. The learned counsel for the respondent states that in terms of Section10, 11 and 12 of the Pharmacy Act of 1948, the respondent has framed regulations for granting the approval

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2007

Mahesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Directorate of Education and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-26-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2) and 12(3); Education Regulation, 1991 - Regulations 10 to 13 and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT509; 2007(96)DRJ589

inspection of D. Pharma course for granting approval of the D. Pharma course under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 for the purpose of registration as a pharmacist. It will be the responsibility of the institution to obtain … the respondent No. 1. The respondent No. 1, however, issued no objection on 1.6.2005 to respondent No. 3. 21. Regarding the Marwar College of Pharmacy, Maulasar (Didwana), Nagour, Rajasthan, the respondent No. 2 contended that approval was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial