Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: pharmacy act 1948 section 16 · Page 1 of about 243 results (0.072 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 08 2000

Rajasthan Pharmacy Council, Jaipur Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-08-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 22 and 26; General Clauses Act, 1997; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 16

Reported in : 2001(1)WLC722; 2001(2)WLN434

its president, Sri Ramesh Ojha, which is a body corporate within the meaning of Section 22 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948, having perpetual succession and a common seal with power to acquire or hold property both moveable and immovable … with law.(7). In support of his aforesaid arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention towards Section 16 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which provides that whereby any Central Act-or Regulation, a power to make

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 1991

Krupanidhi Education Trust (Regd.) and Another Vs. the Secretary, Phar ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-30-1991

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCivil

Acts : Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 4, 9, 10, 12(1), 14, 15, 16 and 29; Education Regulations, 1981 - Regulations 5, 7 and 14

Reported in : AIR1992Delhi238; ILR1992Delhi798

a trust at Bangalore in the State of Karnataka. It is an authority under Section 12(l) of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (for short the Act) for conducting a course of study for pharmacists and is duly approved for this' … the Central Council,. and shall have effect as soon as they are published in the Official Gazette. Under Section 16, Executive Committee is to appoint Inspector for the purpose of Chapter II relating to the Pharmacy Council of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 1998

Dr. Mukhtiar Chand and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-08-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - Sections 33; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(2), 21, 25 and 27; Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Rule 2; Indian Medical Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 17(3), 22; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1 and 6); East Punjab Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 1949; Pepsu Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 2008 BK - Sections 16(3); Punjab Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 1963; The Indian Medical Degrees Act, 1916 - Sections 3; Indian Medical Council Act, 1933; The Homeopathic Central Council Act, 1973; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Bombay Medical Act, 1912 - Sections 7(3); Bihar and Orissa Medical Act, 1916; Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 1965; Uttar Pradesh Indian Medicine

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(SC)457; AIR1999SC468; JT1998(7)SC78; 1998(5)SCALE501; (1998)7SCC579; [1998]Supp2SCR143

dated April 9, 1960 with effect from 14.05.1960, defines the expression 'registered medical practitioner'.25. For purposes of the Pharmacy Act, 1948, the expression medical practitioner is defined by substituting Section 2(f) therein with effect from 01.05.1960. Section 2(f) of … whether directly or by implication as practising or being prepared to practise Ayurvedic system or Unani system. Section 16(3) of the Pepsu Ayurvedic and Unani Practitioners Act, 2008 B.K. enjoins that no Vaids/Hakims shall be registered under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 26 2007

Mahesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Directorate of Education and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-26-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2) and 12(3); Education Regulation, 1991 - Regulations 10 to 13 and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT509; 2007(96)DRJ589

inspection of D. Pharma course for granting approval of the D. Pharma course under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 for the purpose of registration as a pharmacist. It will be the responsibility of the institution to obtain … consequently the petitioners are not eligible to sit in the examination under Section 12(2) of the Pharmacy Act. 16. The respondent No. 2 has also detailed the cases filed by respondent No. 3 where no relief was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2026

Pharmacy Council of India vs Sls College of Pharmacy

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2026

Subject : Education

14.12.2023 stipulated that allinstitutions that are already approved for the conduct of course/approved under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act, 1948’) for B.Pharm/D.Pharm/M.Pharm/Pharm D/Pharm D (PB)/B.Pharm (Practice) have to mandatorily apply, submitting … approval for the reason that Sections 12 and 13 are mutually exclusive. It has also been argued that Section 16 vests ample power with the Executive Committee of the appellant-PCI to appoint Inspectors for the purpose of inspecting

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2026

Spark College of Pharmacy (Pci-3020) vs Pharmacy Council of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-13-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court of India.”2. The brief facts in the present case are that the respondent has beenestablished under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (“the Act”) to regulate the field of pharmacy education, institution and courses in the country.3. The affiliating university … Hence, the present petition.8. Mr. Sai Deepak, learned senior counsel, appearing for the respondentstates that in terms of Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Pharmacy Act of 1948, the respondent has framed regulations for granting the … Ilesh Shukla, Mr. Chetan Sharma, Mr. Ravi Kaushik, Advs.+ W.P.(C) 3355/2026&CM APPL. 16154/2026 JAINATH MEMORIAL PHARMACY COLLEGE.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Knat, Mr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2026

Rps College of Pharmacy vs Pharmacy Council of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-27-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

and connected matters.5. The brief facts in the present case are that the respondent has beenestablished under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (“the Act”) to regulate the field of pharmacy education, institution and courses in the country. The affiliating university … said courses.9. Hence, the present petition.10. Mr. Singh, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent states that interms of Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Pharmacy Act of 1948, the respondent has framed regulations for granting the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2026

Baba Paras Nath College of Pharmacy and Paramedical Sciences (Pci-8269 ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-13-2026

Subject : Education

and connected matters.5. The brief facts in the present case are that the respondent has beenestablished under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (“the Act”) to regulate the field of pharmacy education, institution and courses in the country. The affiliating university … said courses.9. Hence, the present petition.10. Mr. Singh, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent states that interms of Section 10, 11 and 12 of the Pharmacy Act of 1948, the respondent has framed regulations for granting the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2026

Baba Ramdal Surajdev Pharmacy College vs Pharmacy Council of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-06-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

. .”2. The brief facts in the present case are that the respondent has been established under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (“the Act”) to regulate the field of pharmacy education, institution and courses in the country.3. The affiliating university … said pharmacy courses.7. Hence, the present petition.8. The learned counsel for the respondent states that in terms of Section10, 11 and 12 of the Pharmacy Act of 1948, the respondent has framed regulations for granting the approval

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2019

l.r. College of Pharmacy vs.all India Council for Technical Education

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-09-2019

Subject : Education

Hon’ble High Court of Madras vide order dated 31.01.2019 has held that in as much as both the Pharmacy Act, 1948 and the AICTE Act, 1987 contain provisions regarding pharmacy education leading to duplications of regulations and considerable confusion … 2 SCC617 wherein vide paragraph 54, it has been observed to the effect:-"“54. The non obstante language of Section 16 requires the affiliating body to grant affiliation only after recognition or permission has been granted by NCTE. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial