Advanced Search Results
Mahesh Kumar and ors. Vs. Directorate of Education and ors.
Delhi
Mar-26-2007
Constitution
University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 12, 12(1), 12(2) and 12(3); Education Regulation, 1991 - Regulations 10 to 13 and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226
140(2007)DLT509; 2007(96)DRJ589
inspection of D. Pharma course for granting approval of the D. Pharma course under Section 12 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 for the purpose of registration as a pharmacist. It will be the responsibility of the institution to obtain … Anil Kumar, J. 1. The petitioners are the students of R.R. College of Pharmacy, respondent No. 3, and they have sought that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrupanidhi Education Trust (Regd.) and Another Vs. the Secretary, Phar ...
Delhi
Oct-30-1991
Trusts and SocietiesCivil
Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 4, 9, 10, 12(1), 14, 15, 16 and 29; Education Regulations, 1981 - Regulations 5, 7 and 14
AIR1992Delhi238; ILR1992Delhi798
a trust at Bangalore in the State of Karnataka. It is an authority under Section 12(l) of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (for short the Act) for conducting a course of study for pharmacists and is duly approved for this' … The petitioner is a trust at Bangalore in the State of Karnataka. It is an authority under Section 12(l) of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (for short the Act) for conducting a course of study for pharmacists and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBasavaraj M. and Others Vs. the Karnataka State Pharmacy Council, Bang ...
Karnataka
Feb-05-2001
Constitution
Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 4, 10(3), (4) and (5), 11, 12, 12(1) and (2), 13, 14, 18, 30(2), 31 and 32; Education Regulation for Diploma Course in Pharmacy, 1991 - Regulations 2, 7and 9
AIR2001Kant239
which they have written are not approved by this respondent as per Section 12(1) and (2) of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 and as such the petitions are liable to be dismissed with costs'.In paragraphs 5, 6 and 7, it
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shivraj Singh Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.
Uttaranchal
Dec-21-2004
Civil
Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 10, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Constitution of India - Article 226; Education Regulations
AIR2005Utr39
they got admission in the year 1998-99. They also completed apprentice training as required under Section 10 of Pharmacy Act, 1948. But Uttar Pradesh Pharmacy Council (respondent No. 3) is not registering the name of the petitioners on the … course of Diploma in Pharmacy from Government Polytechnic Uttarkashi, District Uttarkashi, where they got admission in the year 1998-99. They also completed apprentice training as required under Section 10 of Pharmacy Act, 1948. But Uttar Pradesh Pharmacy
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagannath Das Vs. State of Orissa and anr.
Orissa
Apr-12-1968
Civil
Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 1(3); Pharmacy (Amendment) Act, 1959
AIR1968Ori176; 34(1968)CLT594
State Pharmacy Councils), Chapter IV (Sections 29-4D Registration of Pharmacists) and Chapter V (Sections 41-46 Miscellaneous) of the Pharmacy Act. 1948 (Central Act VIII of 1948) as the Act stood before its amendment by the Pharmacy (Amendment) Act, 1959 … was also made to similar provisions in other statutes including the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1954 (Act LTV of 1948). Section 1 (3) and (4) of that Aet so far as material, provides as follows:'1. x x x x x
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahesh Jhajharia and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Oct-16-1998
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226; Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 12(1)
AIR1999Raj56; 1999(2)WLC248
the Pharmacy Council of India (for short 'PCI') is concerned, it has referred to Section 12(1) of the Pharmacy Act, 1948 which states that any authority in a State which conducts Course of study for Pharmacists, has to apply
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJitendra NaraIn Gangwar and ors. Vs. U.P. Technical University at Luck ...
Allahabad
Aug-01-2003
Constitution
Uttar Pradesh Technical University Act, 2000 - Sections 19(1) and 29(1); Uttar Pradesh Technical University Ordinances - Ordinances 4.2, 4.3, 9.3 and 10.1; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 2; Pharmacy Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Articles 246 and 254(2)
2003(4)AWC3266
of grace marks, and as such there is clear cut discrimination. He further submits that the provisions of Pharmacy Act, 1948 after enforcement of All India Council For Technical Education Act, 1987, stand impliedly repealed under Article 372 of … Technical University in the State for the advancement and development of Technical education and other matters connected therewith. Sections 6, 14, 19, 21, 29 and 30 of the said Act being relevant are quoted below :'6. The … 4 years B. Tech. Course in 7 years. In Writ Petition No. 15865 of 2003, prayer has been made for issuing a writ in the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Dattatraya Ade Vs. Presiding Officer, School Tribunal,
Mumbai
Mar-13-2003
Service
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 2, 2(20), 2(24) and 9; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1990; Pharmacy Act, 1948; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981; Constitution of India - Articles 245, 246, 254 and 254(1); Bombay Civil Services Rules
2003(3)BomCR465; 2003(2)MhLj316
apply to technicalinstitutions. Pharmacy institutions are not governed by theAct and the Rules as they are governed by Pharmacy Act, 1948,as well as by the All India Council for Technical EducationAct, 1987. The Tribunal, therefore, committed an error of … C.K. Thakker, C.J. 1. Both these petitions have been placed before us pursuantto an order passed … passed by the management, thepetitioner approached the School Tribunal, Amravati Region, byfiling Appeal No. 43 of 1984 under Section 9 of the Act. ThePresiding Officer of the School Tribunal vide an order datedJanuary 16, 1986 partly allowed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajasthan Pharmacy Council, Jaipur Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Rajasthan
Dec-08-2000
Service
Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 22 and 26; General Clauses Act, 1997; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 16
2001(1)WLC722; 2001(2)WLN434
its president, Sri Ramesh Ojha, which is a body corporate within the meaning of Section 22 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948, having perpetual succession and a common seal with power to acquire or hold property both moveable and immovable … Sri Ramesh Ojha, which is a body corporate within the meaning of Section 22 of the Pharmacy Act, 1948, having perpetual succession and a common seal with power to acquire or hold property both moveable and immovable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPharmacy Council of India, New Delhi and anr. Vs. Smt. Archna Patwari ...
Karnataka
Nov-23-2001
Constitution
Pharmacy Act, 1948 - Sections 10, 11, 12, 32, 32(1) and 32(2)
ILR2002KAR22; 2002(3)KarLJ178
writ of mandamus directing the second appellant herein to issue a certificate as a registered pharmacist under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Pharmacy Act').3. The writ petition was contested by the second appellant herein contending … the B.Pharma course in the second respondent-college of pharmacy in the year 1989. The said college is affiliated to Gulbarga University. The first respondent completed … not a registered pharmacist and the third respondent college where she studied is not an approved college under Section 12 of the Act and she has not undergone the course which is approved by them. Therefore, she
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »