Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: pensions act 1871 section 7 · Page 1 of about 175 results (0.040 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 13 1934

The Secretary of State for India Vs. Parashram Madhavrao

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-13-1934

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1934)36BOMLR551

instituted within twelve years from that year was Well in time; ; (4) that, in View of the Pensions Act, 1871, Section 6, it was not open to the plaintiff to obtain an order for payment, and that the decree … year 1892-93. The result in each case was an increase in the Government assessment. The plaintiff, on March 7, 1900, applied to the Collector Saheb Bahadur of the Ratnagiri District, claiming to be paid his percentage on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1987

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Wing Commander R.R. Hingorani (Retd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-30-1987

Subject : Property

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 7(2); Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Rules, 1971 - Rule 8; Allotment of Government Premises (General Pool in Delhi) Rules, 1963

Reported in : AIR1987SC808; JT1987(1)SC290; (1987)IILLJ3SC; 1987(1)SCALE203; (1987)1SCC551; [1987]2SCR94; 1987(3)SLJ154(SC); 1987(1)LC390(SC)

from the commuted pension payable to him which, according to him, was contrary to Section 11 of the Pensions Act, 1871, by process of seizure and sequestration. The respondent complaints that despite his repeated requests, he was not given … for the period of his unauthorised occupation. In consequence thereof, proceedings were initiated by the Estate Officer under Section 7 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 to recover Rs. 38,811.17p. as damages. The Estate

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1928

The Secretary of State for India in Council Represented by the Collect ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-06-1928

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 114Ind.Cas.626

Chittor had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit by reason of the provisions of Section 4 of the Pensions Act (XXIII of 1871). The argument is that Mahomed Moosa was given a pension of sixty pagodas a month … the liability of Government to pay any such pension or grant as aforesaid is affected directly or indirectly.' Section 7 contains exceptions to Sections 4 and 6. Section 7 is as follows:Nothing in Sections 4 and 6 applies

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 25 1926

Shah Mohammad Habibul Rahman Vs. Syed Abdul Hai and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-25-1926

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 95Ind.Cas.208

the dispute relates is a political pension or whether it is a property within Section 7 of the Pensions Act, being Act XXIII of 1871.3. As already stated it is the plaintiff's case that originally there was a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 1925

Mohammad Mazhar Ali Vs. Musammat Biggha Begam

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-06-1925

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 89Ind.Cas.364

pension, is entered in the register which was prepared for entering pensions coming under Section 7(2) of the Pensions Act (No. XXIII of 1871), which are expressly declared to be transferable. The learned Subordinate Judge says that this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 1952

Lal Dhananjay Singh Vs. Lal Bhim Bikram Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-05-1952

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7 and 7(2) - Schedule - Article 17; Pensions Act, 1871 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1953All442

Act, 1870 - not applicable to a suit for declaration of right to receive arrears of pension - Pensions Act, 1871, applies in such cases. - … of Rs. 7800/- and a further sum of Rs. 146/14/- on 12 times the annuity was due under Section 7(ii)(a), Court-fees (Amendment) Act, The total of these two amounts came to Rs. 875/-, but since Rs. 18/12/- had

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 1946

Narendrasingji Ranjitsingji Vs. Udesinghji

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-04-1946

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : AIR1947Bom451; (1947)49BOMLR318

properties, but her claim to the malikana was not dealt with in absence of a certificate under the Pensions Act, 1871. The daughter sued in 1890 to establish her title as reversionary heir to her father subject to the … must, therefore, be dismissed with costs. Indian Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Articles 131, 120-Pensions Act (XXIII of 1871), Section 6-Application under Pensions Act to file suit for declaration of share in Toda Giras allowance-Filing of suit after … the defendants, was the grantee of a Toda Giras allowance of Rs. 7,197 per year from the British Government. After his death his widow adopted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Hafiza Bibi Vs. Sahib-un-nissa Bibi

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All213

the ordinary acceptance of the term, but it was what was contemplated by Section 7 of the Indian Pensions Act. By that section, which enacts the law for the Muhammadans as well as the Hindus, it is enacted … gift under the Muhammadan law.3. The assignment of pension is void under the provisions of Act XXIII of 1871.5. The Hon. T. Conlan and Mr. Amiruddin, for the Appellant.6. Mr. C. H. Hill and Pandit Sundar Lal,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1926

(Shah Muhammad) Habibul Rahman Vs. Syed Abdul Hai and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-25-1926

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1926All521

the dispute relates, is a political pension or whether it is a property within Section 7 of the Pensions Act, being Act 23 of 1871. As already stated, it is the plaintiff's case that originally there was a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 1922

Mazhar Ali Khan Vs. Mahfuz Hasan

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-25-1922

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 68Ind.Cas.854

appeal, therefore, fails and is dismissed with costs and fees on the higher seale. Pensions Act (XXIII of 1871), Section 7 - Pension, attachment of--facts showing attachability be set out. -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial