Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: pensions act 1871 section 3a · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.021 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 05 2022

Mohanan Nair P.G. vs Omallur Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.No.Q 228

Court : Kerala

Decided on : May-05-2022

Insurance Scheme as they apply in relation to any amount payable out of the Fund.” Sec.11 of the Pensions Act, 1871 (Central Act 23 of 1871) provides as follows:“Sec.11. Exemption of pension from attachment.- No pension granted or continued … issued as S.O.No.874/E stating that the said notification is issued in exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (3A) of Section 7 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 [Central Act 39 of 1972], that the Central

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 1968

State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Maharaja Pratap Singh Bahadur

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-11-1968

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3A, 4, 23(1), 24A(1); Bihar Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1953 - Sections 2, 2A, 4 and 24A

Reported in : AIR1969SC164; 1968(16)BLJR973; [1968]3SCR734

148 malikana was described as a grant of a portion of a land revenue. For purposes of the Pensions Act, 1871 because sec. 3 of the Act interpreted the expression 'grant of money or land revenue' to include anything … on the publication of the notification under sub-section (1) of section 3, or sub-section (1) or 2 of section 3A the following consequences shall ensue, namely :- (a) Such estate or tenure including the interests of the proprietor

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2025

Sri. Naveenkumar vs Sri. Prabhulinganagouda

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Jan-31-2025

the State of Hyderabad, and was in service for a period of 40 years before he retired on pension. Though there is no precise evidence as to what salary he was drawing, it could not have been … The plaintiffs demanded partition and separate possession. Defendant No.1 refused to -5- effect partition. Hence, a cause of action arose for the plaintiffs to file a suit for partition and separate possession. Accordingly, prays to decree the … 11 - properties and second SL.No.3 properties shall be partitioned as per Section 54 of the CPC., 1908. The plaintiffs aggrieved by the dismissal of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial