Advanced Search Results

Glaxo Smith Kline Plc and ors. Vs. Controller of Patents and Designs a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 5(2), 11B(3), 24A, 24B, 24B(1) and 78; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 - Sections 21 and 78; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Ceylon Interpretation Ordinance, 1900

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW376; AIR2009SC1147; 2008(4)AWC3839(SC); 2008BusLR879(SC); (SCSuppl)2008(4)CHN197; LC2008(3)131; (2009)2MLJ548(SC); 2008(38)PTC1(SC); 2008(12)SCALE284; 2008(6)LHSC4364.

rejected the application filed by the writ petitioners on December 28, 2004. On January 1, 2005 the Patent (Amendment Act), 2005 came into operation by which various amendments to the Act were made and the Chapter IV-A which provided … had set aside the order dated 28.12.2004 passed by the Controller of Patents and Designs (in short the `Controller') and remanded the matter to him … provision clearly applies even if it is treated to be pending under Section 11B(3).6. To the present case, Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (in short the `General Clauses Act') applies. It reads as follows:6. Effect

Glaxo Smith Kline Plc and ors. Vs. Controller of Patents and Designs a ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 3, 5(2), 11B(3), 24A, 24A(1) and 24A(2); ;Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 - Sections 21, 78 and 78(5); ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6

Reported in : 2006(3)CHN577

regard to it.9. It is argured by Counsel for the respondents that in view of provisions of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005, Section 78, nothing remains to be decided in the present case. He says that in view of that Section … Court shall amount to reviving the disposed of proceedings before the authority, and in view of provisions in Section 6(a) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 it is not permissible.17. In reply, Counsel for the petitioners refers me

Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1), 6, 8, 10, 11, 11A, 11B, 12, 13, 14, 35 to 42, 47, 47(1), 47(2), 47(3), 47(4), 48, 57, 58, 64, 64(1), 64(3), 99, 100, 100(1), 101(3), 101(5), 103, 107, 156, 177 and 240; Patents and Designs Act, 1911; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Patents (Amendment) Ordinance, 2005; Patents Rules, 2003; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(23)

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR896; 2009(111)BomLR479

force by way of ordinance, namely, Patents (Amendment) Ordinance 2005 dated 26.12.2004 and ultimately was enacted as the Patents Amendment Act, 2005 which has made substantial changes. To the inventor a patent system confers certain definite advantages. The incentive for … appears to be the central idea.8. Chapter III of the Patents Act, 1970 provides for applications for patents. Section 6 of the Act provides for the persons who are entitled to apply and it says that application can

Indian Network for People Living with Hiv/Aids, Rep. by Its President ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2(C), 25, 25(1), 25(2), 64, 77 and 159; Patents Rules, 2003 - Rule 2, 55, 55(1) to (6), 55A; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1) and 6(2); Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Bengal Money Lenders Act - Sections 35; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 89; Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 41(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 66 and 90; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226

Reported in : 2009BusLR478; 2009(1)CTC32; LC2009(2)36

to as the 'said Act). In the said application it was contended by the petitioners that the Indian Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 was passed to make the said Act compliant with the obligations under TRIPS. TRIPS, signed in 1995, required … representation by way of opposition at a pre-grant stage to the Patent Application of the 4th respondent under Section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 (herein after referred to as the 'said Act). In the said application … Grenzacherstrasse CH 4200, Basle, Switzerland. It filed a Patent Application titled '-(2-Amino-1, 6-Dihydro-6-oxopurin- 9-yl)-methoxy-1,3-propanediol Derivative', which was allocated No. 959/MAS/1995, for a patent relating to

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11B(1), 11B(3), 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(4), 25, 26(1), 43, 47, 48, 53(1), 64, 104A, 105, 106 and 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 48; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Motor Vehicles Act; Patents Act, 1949; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(8), 26(1), 51 and 53

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

'patent' means a patent for any invention granted under this Act.The said definition itself was substituted by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Act 15 of 2085) with effect from 01.01.2005. Prior to the said Amendment, Section 2(m) defined 'patent' as,'patent' … application for revocation of applicant's patent No. 195904 before Indian Patents Appellate Board [in short, 'IPAB'] under Section 64 of the Patents Act, 1970.10(f). In October, 2007, the respondent filed the suit in C.S. No. 979 of

Commissioner of Income Tax, Dehradun and anr. Vs. Enron Oil and Gas In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32, 42, 42(1), 115A and 293A

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(SC)641; [2008]305ITR75(SC); JT2008(10)SC154; 2008(12)SCALE225; 2008(2)LC1265(SC)

repeal of the enactment under which the consideration had been sought. INDIAN PATENT ACT, 1970 Section 5(2) & Patent (Amendment) Act, 2005, Chapter IV-A.: [Arijit … of the enactment under which the consideration had been sought. INDIAN PATENT ACT, 1970 Section 5(2) & Patent (Amendment) Act, 2005, Chapter IV-A.: [Arijit Pasayat & Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ] Patent for Exclusive Marketing right - Application for grant … currency translation - Order of Tribunal confirmed - Revenue's appeal dismissed - GENERAL CLAUSES ACT (10 OF 1897) Section 6: [Dr. Arijit Pasayat & Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ] Effect of Amending Act Held, When pre existing right of

M/S Duro Felguera s.A Vs. M/S. Gangavaram Port Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

for 'international commercial arbitration' under Corporate Guarantee (17.03.2012) executed by the foreign company-Duro Felguera?.13. The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 (w.e.f. 23.10.2015) has brought in substantial changes in the provisions of the Arbitra- tion and Conciliation Act, … Rani Construction Private Limited, (2002) 2 SCC388 15. However, in the year 2005, a Constitution Bench of Seven Judges in SBP and Co. v. Patel … High Court or the person or institution designated by such Court is final and no appeal including Letters Patent Appeal shall lie against such decision].. *[(8) The Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the High … No.30 of 2016 has been filed by M/s Duro Felguera, S.A. under Section 11(6)(a) read with Sectiion 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Sp.Chockalingam Vs. Controller of Patents

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

that the amendment introduced to Section 126 of the Patents Act, 1970, by Section 67 (a) of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Act 15 of 2005) as illegal, unconstitutional, ultra vires and void. For Petitioner : Mr.SP.Chockalingam, party-in-person For Respondents … Writ of Declaration, declaring that the amendment introduced to Section 126 of the Patents Act, 1970, by Section 67 (a) of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Act 15 of 2005) as illegal, unconstitutional, ultra vires and void.

J. Mitra and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Controller of Patents and Desig. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Indian Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 8, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 25(4), 27, 28, 29(2), 29(3), 51, 54, 57, 60, 61, 63, 64, 66, 69(3), 78, 84, 84(1) to 84(5), 88, 89, 91, 92, 93, 94, 96, 97, 116, 116(1), 116(2), 117A, 117A(2), 117G and 158; Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 116; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 47; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 83; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 - Sections 23, 25 and 61

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC366(SC); LC2008(3)31; 2008(38)PTC6(SC); 2008(11)SCALE524; (2008)10SCC368

a classic illustration of the confusion which has emerged on account of the postponement of in-part commencement of Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005.4. Quite often the commencement of an Act is postponed to some specified future date or to such date … confusion with regard to pending FAO No. 293/06 filed by respondent No. 3 in the High Court under Section 116 of the Indian Patents Act, 1970 as amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999 w.e.f. 26.3.99.5. Span … 25, Section 27, Section 28, Section 51, Section 54, Section 57, Section 60, Section 61, Section 63, Sub-section (3) of Section 69, Section 78, Section

M/S. Philips Electronics India Limited Vs. M/S. Asian Electronics Limi ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Judge The Honourable Smt. Justice Prabha Sridevan, Chairman &Amp; D.P.S. Parmar, Technical Member (Patents)