Advanced Search Results

Bayer Corporation vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of the fact that the term "importing" was specifically included in Section 107A of the Act by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005, without any mention of the word export" or "offering for sale". This clearly indicates that the legislature did … judge were not taken into consideration and in fact, it has been held by the latter in paragraph 56 of the impugned judgment that:".... Even if it were to be believed that the patented invention once exported

Novartis Ag Vs. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd.

Court : Trademark

Subject : Intellectual Property

Matched in: Judge V Rengasamy, A C Patents, Designs

Novartis Ag Vs. Hetero Drugs Limited

Court : Trademark

Subject : Intellectual Property

Matched in: Judge V Rengasamy, A C Patents, Designs

Dr. Aloys Wobben Vs. Yogesh Mehra and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Mr Andhyarujina, submitted that after the amendment of Section 64 of the Patents Act, by virtue of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 "a person interested" may approach one of the two forums for revocation of a patent, i.e., the High … a joint venture of Enercon and the Mehras, was controlled by Enercon, in as much as, it held 56% shares in EIL. Dr. Wobben, who had assigned his rights in the patents in issue, in favour of

Sandeep Soni vs.sanjay Roy & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act. (viii) After the amendment brought about in Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act under the Amendment Act 48 of 2001 which came into effect from 24.9.2001, the petitioner was required to pay stamp duty to … or the person or institution designated by such Court would be final and no appeal including the Letters Patent Appeal shall lie against such decision. 16.5 Lastly, sub-section (13) of Section 11 provides that an application is

Greater Bombay Co-op. Bank Ltd. Vs. United Yarn Tex. Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : BankingConstitution

Acts : Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 2, 3, 17, 18, 31 and 34; Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions (Amendment) Act, 1965 - Sections 56; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(6), 2(10), 2(20), 18A, 36, 43, 44, 50, 55, 64, 72, 73, 78, 81, 83, 84, 88, 91, 91(1), 92, 94, 95, 97, 98, 101, 101(1), 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 156 and 161; The Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 22, 39, 40, 74, 83, 84, 99 and 101; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 2, 9, 19, 30A, 31, 31A, 35, 47, 47(2), 50, 51, 52, 61, 61(1), 62, 63, 64, 65, 70, 70(2), 71, 71(1), 71(2), 72, 73, 75, 76 and 77; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 20(2), 56 and 56(1); Banking Regulation (

Reported in : AIR2007SC1584; 2007(3)ALT1(SC); [2007]137CompCas63(SC); JT2007(5)SC201; 2007(3)KLT302(SC); 2007(3)MhLj434; 2007(5)SCALE366; (2007)6SCC236; 2007AIRSCW2325; 2007(3)AIRKarR406

of a Co-operative Society into a Multi-State Co- operative Society by an amendment in its bye-laws with the approval of the Central Registrar who shall … by a co-operative bank for recovery of its debts. The Division Bench on consideration of the provisions of Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 [ for short 'the BR Act'] came to the conclusion that 'Co- … an order in execution proceedings, by the Registrar on any claim or application of a Co-operative Bank, is patently and inherently without jurisdiction, null, void and inoperative.(j) During the pendency of these writ petitions, by virtue of … This is what the Bench observed in the order dated 1st December, 2005.This batch of Appeals/SLPs involved an important issue regarding right of recovery of

F. Hoffmann-la Roche Ltd. and anr. Vs. Cipla Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1), 3, 5(2), 11A(7), 11B, 12, 13(4), 14, 25(1), 25(2), 28, 43, 47, 48, 64, 83, 84, 92, 92A and 107; Companies Act, 1956; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 - Sections 3; Trade Marks Act - Sections 31; Essential Commodities Act, 1953; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 39, Rule 1; Drug Price Control Order

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT243; LC2009(2)1; 2009(40)PTC125(Del)

that in terms of the second proviso to Section 11-A(7) of the Patents Act 1970, introduced by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (effective from 1st January, 2005), in case of patent applications filed under Section 5 (2) [which concerns a

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Goel Bus Service Kullu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 4-A, Section 5-A along with Schedule-III under Section 3-A introduced vide the Himachal Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation (Amendment) Act, 19991 to be held ultra vires the Constitution of India and further the notifications dated 18.12.1999, 23.12.1999, 31.12.1999, … The High Court had also quashed the notifications issued by the State for levy of the taxes under Section 56 3A(3) holding that lumpsum taxes could not be levied on general assessment and it had to be levied … and intercourse. The nexus between the levy and the service is so patent in the case of such taxes that we need say no more

Ajeet Singh Alias Muraha Son of Vijay Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 630; The Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagir Abolition) Act, 1954; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960; Dowry Prohibition Act; Prevention of Corruption Act; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 12B, 34, 323, 395, 406, 408, 409, 465, 468, 471, 498A, 504 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 41, 42, 50, 50A, 54, 57, 154, 154(1), 155, 155(2), 156, 156(1), 157, 157(1), 159, 162, 167, 170, 173, 190, 437(3), 438, 439 and 482; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 2005; Evidence Act - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 22, 22(1), 32, 141, 143, 226 and 227; Civi

Reported in : 2007CriLJ170

Supreme Court in this case, the provisions of the Code have been amended by Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005 by which Section 50A has been inserted. It requires the Police to give information about the arrest of … authority or jurisdiction to go into the matter or examine the correctness of allegations unless the allegations are patently absurd and inherently improbable so that no prudent person can ever reach to such a conclusion and that … as observed in Satyapal v. State of U.P. and Ors. 2000 Cr.LJ. 569, or according to the criteria laid down by the Supreme Court in

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property

agreement, the Patents Act, 1970, was subjected to large scale changes in three stages; and finally, by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005, section 5 was altogether deleted from the Parent Act (Patents Act, 1970). Between January 1, 1995 and January 1, … should be adapted in order to use to the full the flexibilities contained in the TRIPS Agreement (WHA 56.27, May 2003 and 57.14, May 2004). In accordance with its mandate, WHO will therefore seek to provide technical