Advanced Search Results

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11B(1), 11B(3), 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(4), 25, 26(1), 43, 47, 48, 53(1), 64, 104A, 105, 106 and 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 48; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Motor Vehicles Act; Patents Act, 1949; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(8), 26(1), 51 and 53

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

'patent' means a patent for any invention granted under this Act.The said definition itself was substituted by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Act 15 of 2085) with effect from 01.01.2005. Prior to the said Amendment, Section 2(m) defined 'patent' as,'patent' … by various High Courts, including,(i) Dhanpat Seth and Ors. v. Nil Kamal Plastic Crates Ltd. 2006 (33) PTC 339 ;(ii) Bilcare Limited v. Supreme Industries Ltd. ; (iii) Kalindi Medicare Pvt. Ltd. v. Intis Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and

Span Diagnostic Vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Design and anr ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 83; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 8, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 25(3), 25(4), 27, 28, 29(2), 29(3), 37, 41, 42, 47, 51, 54, 57, 59 to 63, 66, 69(3), 74, 78, 84(1) to 84(5), 85, 86, 88, 88(3), 89, 91, 92, 93, 94, 96, 97, 116, 116(1), 116(2), 117, 117A, 117A(2), 117G and 158; Patents Amendment Act, 2002 - Sections 1(2), 18 and 47; Patents Amendment Act, 2005 - Sections 1(1), 1(2), 23, 60 and 61; Patents Amendment Act, 1999

Reported in : LC2009(1)22; 2008(37)PTC56(Del)

notification issued in the year 2007 as also the further amendment to the Patents Act, 1970 by the Patents Amendment Act, 2005, again bringing into effect the provisions of the said Amendment Act on 2 different dates. 3. As I … 47 of the Patents Amendment Act, 2002 was omitted. Further, vide Section 61 of the Amendment Act of 2005, Section 117A of the principal Act as inserted by Section 47 of the Patents Amendment Act, 2002 was also … resolved in an appropriate case, should one come up before this Court. 33. It is settled law that when enacting a Statute the legislature can

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary and Others

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Intellectual Property

filed representations by way of oppositions under section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 as amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) with request for hearing under rule 55 of the Patents Rules, 2003 … as methane -, ethane - or - 2-hydroxy ethane -sulfonic acid.” Further, on page 25, Col. 19, line 33 of above ‘Novartis Vol A Compilation, Zimmerman Patent clearly stated that salts of the compound of formula I

J. Mitra and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kesar Medicaments and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Patents Rules, 2003 - Rule 55; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 3, 11, 12, 13, 13(4), 14, 18, 25, 25(1), 25(4), 30, 64, 107, 117A and 117A(2); Patents Amendment Act, 2005

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT198; 2008(102)DRJ106; LC2008(2)1; 2008(36)PTC568(Del)

the said Act, it may be noticed that prior to the amendment of the said Act vide the Patents Amendment Act, 2005, to the provisions inter alias of Section 117A(2), which came into force from 2.04.2007, appeal could be brought … submitted in respect of the PCT report that the said report notes that as far as PCT Article 33(2) is concerned, Claims 1-13 of the plaintiff meet the criteria set out therein as the prior art does

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. and Others Vs. Cipla Ltd. and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

to pharmaceuticals. 47. Section 3 is an exclusionary clause'. The present provision was expanded by way of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005. Despite the fact that ˜inventionis exhaustively defined, the need for an exclusionary provision obviously arose from the Legislative … standard in assessing the question of further working on an invention that could revoke it in the future. 33. With these yardsticks laid down, the judgment offers some rather constructive feedback' on what Roche could have done

Sp.Chockalingam Vs. Controller of Patents

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

that the amendment introduced to Section 126 of the Patents Act, 1970, by Section 67 (a) of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Act 15 of 2005) as illegal, unconstitutional, ultra vires and void. For Petitioner : Mr.SP.Chockalingam, party-in-person For Respondents

Mylan (Previously Matrix) Laboratories Limited a Company Registered Un ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Land Acquisition

revocation of the Patent No. 196774 under the provisions of the Patents Act, 1970 as amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005. 3. The applicant herein filed a Miscellaneous Petition No. 33/2013 for taking on record 12 additional documents. The … the evidence.” “12. In this case, the Petitioner claims that these documents would show that the duty under Section 8 of the Patents Act was breached by the Respondent. After Justice Ayyangars report, when this Act came

Asha D/O Bhalchandra Joshi Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(14), 4, 16, 17, 20, 96, 100, 100A, 110 and 115; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 23 and 30; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 110, 140, 163A, 166, 169(2), 173 and 176; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 12F, 397, 398 and 483; Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 18; Motor Vehicles Rules - Rules 275 and 276; Bombay Public Trusts Act - Sections 72; Letters Patent Act - 30, 70, 72, 72(1) and 108

Reported in : 2009ACJ223; 2008(1)ALLMR745; 2008(2)BomCR76; 2008(1)MhLj724

Section 100-A in the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 substituted by Section 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 takes away the right of Letters Patent Appeal on and from 1st July, 2002 in respect of … which came to be disposed of by impugned judgment dated 5th August, 2005 whereby the learned single Judge remanded the matter back to the Tribunal, … referred to in Article 3 of Schedule 1 of the Bombay Court Fees Act is the provisions of Section 33 of the 1940Act and bare comparison of that provision with the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 34 … the tenability of this intra-Court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, we would examine whether such an appeal is tenable, in order to

Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1), 6, 8, 10, 11, 11A, 11B, 12, 13, 14, 35 to 42, 47, 47(1), 47(2), 47(3), 47(4), 48, 57, 58, 64, 64(1), 64(3), 99, 100, 100(1), 101(3), 101(5), 103, 107, 156, 177 and 240; Patents and Designs Act, 1911; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Patents (Amendment) Ordinance, 2005; Patents Rules, 2003; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(23)

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR896; 2009(111)BomLR479

force by way of ordinance, namely, Patents (Amendment) Ordinance 2005 dated 26.12.2004 and ultimately was enacted as the Patents Amendment Act, 2005 which has made substantial changes. To the inventor a patent system confers certain definite advantages. The incentive for … referred to in Article 3 of Schedule 1 of the Bombay Court Fees Act is the provisions of Section 33 of the 1940Act and bare comparison of that provision with the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 34

Neon Laboratories Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Troikaa Pharma Limited, and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Patent

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 25(1)(k)(2), 26, 43, 59 ; Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2005 - Rule 55(1)

to the grant of patent. Mr.Grover submits that the Patents Act, 1970 has been extensively amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005. It is submitted by him that Sections 25 and 26 in the old Act have been substituted and … the petition. It is stated that on 29.10.2007 the Petitioner filed a representation by way of opposition under Section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 r/w Rule 55(1) of the Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2005. The Petitioner requested