Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: patents amendment act 2002 section 65 · Page 1 of about 394 results (0.154 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 11 2018

Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. And Ors. Vs.monsanto Technology Llc and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Trade (GATT), including the Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement, India, inter alia, introduced the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, in June 25, 2002. This amendment altered the definition of “an invention” under Section 2(1)(j) to include the … for infringement. Such right to infringement includes a right to sue for a “right relating to a variety” (Section 65 (1) (a)). Thus, if a trait (like a DNA strand, or the nucleic acid sequence as in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2013

Novartis Ag and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-2013

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 3(d)(b), 2(1)(d), 133, 24(A), 25(1), 2(8)(10), 14, 5, 10; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Section 20(1); Patents and Designs Act, 1911

Act of 1999 thus complied with Article 70(8) and (9) of the TRIPS Agreement.68. Three years later the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act No. 38 of 2002) came to be enacted on June 25, 2002. It brought large scale amendments … Alam, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.3. What is the true import of section 3(d) of the Patents Act, 1970?How does it interplay with clauses (j) and (ja) of section 2(1)? Does … Substance is cooled overnight to 25 degrees Celsius, filtered and dried at 65 degrees Celsius, until weight is constant. This results in alpha crystalline form.Step

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2013

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-2013

Subject : Intellectual Property

Act of 1999 thus complied with Article 70(8) and (9) of the TRIPS Agreement.68. Three years later the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act No.38 of 2002) came to be enacted on June 25, 2002. It brought large scale amendments in … Alam, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.3. What is the true import of section 3(d) of the Patents Act, 1970?. How does it interplay with clauses (j) and (ja) of section 2(1)?. … Substance is cooled overnight to 25 degrees Celsius, filtered and dried at 65 degrees Celsius, until weight is constant. This results in alpha crystalline form.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 18 2026

K K Bansal vs Koninklijke Electronics Nv

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

same submission before us.135. This submission cannot sustain, for the simple reason thatSection 107A(b) was amended, by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, with effect from 20 May 2003, to do away with the requirement of the dealer, from whom the … PW-2/6 and PW-2/7 were never produced or proved. PW-2/6A and PW- Inasmuch as no application as required by Sections 63 to 6528 28 63. Secondary evidence.-Secondary evidence means and includes-(1) certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter … and PW- Inasmuch as no application as required by Sections 63 to 6528 28 63. Secondary evidence.-Secondary evidence means and includes-(1) certified copies given under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2026

Rajesh Bansal vs Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

same submission before us.135. This submission cannot sustain, for the simple reason thatSection 107A(b) was amended, by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, with effect from 20 May 2003, to do away with the requirement of the dealer, from whom the … PW-2/6 and PW-2/7 were never produced or proved. PW-2/6A and PW- Inasmuch as no application as required by Sections 63 to 6528 28 63. Secondary evidence.-Secondary evidence means and includes-(1) certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter … and PW- Inasmuch as no application as required by Sections 63 to 6528 28 63. Secondary evidence.-Secondary evidence means and includes-(1) certified copies given under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2025

Anjuman Ishaat-E-Taleem Trust versus the State of Maharashtra and Othe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-01-2025

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.410

It is only in furtherance of its commitment to universal elementary education that Parliament enacted the Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002, introducing Article 21A and elevating the right to free and compulsory education for all children aged between 6 … ‘right to education’ under the Constitution. Charging capitation fee in consideration of admission to educational institutions, is a patent denial of a citizen’s right to education under the Constitution.” 77. However, in Unni Krishnan, J. P. v. … Act have to be complied with by all schools as defined in Section 2(n) of the RTE Act except the schools established and administered by … 649; B. Shama Rao v. Union Territory of Pondicherry [1967] 2 SCR 650 : AIR 1967 SC 1480; State of Orissa v. Sudhanshu Sekhar Misra

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Bayer Corporation vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-22-2019

Subject : Education

ensuring the availability of the same in other countries. He relies on the Notes on Clauses of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002 as well as the Joint Parliamentary Committee Report pertaining to the insertion of Section 107A of the Act. … province or a country other than Canada that regulates the manufacture, construction, use or sale of any product.‖ 65. This provision concerns activities relating to the development and submission of information required by a regulatory body. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2008

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-16-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11B(1), 11B(3), 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(4), 25, 26(1), 43, 47, 48, 53(1), 64, 104A, 105, 106 and 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 48; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Motor Vehicles Act; Patents Act, 1949; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(8), 26(1), 51 and 53

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

at this stage of interim application, while considering the prima facie case and the balance of convenience, the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act 38 of 2002), which has come into effect from 20.05.2003 and Amendment Act 2005, which came into … the defendant in C.S. No. 1111 of 2007.2. C.S. No. 1111 of 2007 is a suit filed under Section 108 of the Patents Act, 1970 for the relief of permanent injunction in respect of the plaintiff's patent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2007

Ramesh Chandra Das Vs. Kishore Chandra Das and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-22-2007

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2007Ori146

and decree of such single Judge.Section 100A was first introduced by amendment by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976. Section 97 of that Amending Act contained the provisions for Repeal and Savings. Section 97(2)(n) of the … the learned Judges of the Full Bench held in paragraph 41, page 65 of the report:.Section 100A of the Code employs the words that where … the Code, as amended in 2002.100A. No further appeal in certain cases --Notwithstanding anything contained in 'any Letters Patent for any High Court or in any other instrument having the force of law or in any other

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2025

C.Mangala Vijayalakshmi vs K.S.Kasimaris

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-2025

aggrieved by any decisionor order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … by ASMJ & CKJ) Prayer in O.S.A.No.430 & 431 of 2001: Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent read with Section 483 of Companies Act 1/1956 to set aside the order passed in C.P.Nos.274, 199 of … 4878, 4880, 4882 and 4885 of 2025 by ASMJ and CKJ.)63.P.Valliammal 64.A.Mangayerkarasi 65.R.Rajalakshmi 66.Rajalakshmi Sundaramoorthy 67.Vetrivel Sundaramoorthy(Respondent - 6 Died. Respondents 63 to 67 are

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial