Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: patents amendment act 2002 section 62 · Page 1 of about 298 results (0.069 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 04 2012

M/S. Philips Electronics India Limited Vs. M/S. Asian Electronics Limi ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on : May-04-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Judge The Honourable Smt. Justice Prabha Sridevan, Chairman &Amp; D.P.S. Parmar, Technical Member (Patents)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2018

Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. And Ors. Vs.monsanto Technology Llc and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Trade (GATT), including the Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement, India, inter alia, introduced the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, in June 25, 2002. This amendment altered the definition of “an invention” under Section 2(1)(j) to include the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2026

K K Bansal vs Koninklijke Electronics Nv

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

same submission before us.135. This submission cannot sustain, for the simple reason thatSection 107A(b) was amended, by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, with effect from 20 May 2003, to do away with the requirement of the dealer, from whom the … PW-2/6 and PW-2/7 were never produced or proved. PW-2/6A and PW- Inasmuch as no application as required by Sections 63 to 6528 28 63. Secondary evidence.-Secondary evidence means and includes-(1) certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter … 36 316 U. S. 241, 250 (1942) 37 553 U. S. 617, 625 (2008) 38 157 U S 659, 661 (1895) KUMAR RFA(OS)(COMM) 17/2018 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 18 2026

Rajesh Bansal vs Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

same submission before us.135. This submission cannot sustain, for the simple reason thatSection 107A(b) was amended, by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, with effect from 20 May 2003, to do away with the requirement of the dealer, from whom the … PW-2/6 and PW-2/7 were never produced or proved. PW-2/6A and PW- Inasmuch as no application as required by Sections 63 to 6528 28 63. Secondary evidence.-Secondary evidence means and includes-(1) certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter … 36 316 U. S. 241, 250 (1942) 37 553 U. S. 617, 625 (2008) 38 157 U S 659, 661 (1895) KUMAR RFA(OS)(COMM) 17/2018 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2022

Ecgc Limited Vs. Mokul Shriram Epc Jv

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-15-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, by virtue of a proviso inserted vide Central Act 62 of 2002 w.e.f. 15.3.2003, the condition was that no appeal shall be entertained by … examining a matter consequent to the amendment on 25.11.1949 by the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax (Second Amendment) Act (Act 57 of 1949) amending the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947. The proviso to Section … Federal Court under the Federal Court (Enlargement of Jurisdiction) Act, 1947 read with clause 39 of the Letters Patent and Sections 109 and 110 of the Code of Civil Procedure provided the conditions thereof were satisfied. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2008

Mohd. Riyazur Rehman Siddiqui Vs. Deputy Director of Health Services

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-25-2008

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 110, 110C, 140, 163A, 165 to 174, 175 and 176; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10F, 397, 398 and 483; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 71, 107 and 108; Specific Relief Act - Sections 6 and 6(3); Contempt of Courts Act - Sections 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Limitation Act - Sections 4 to 24; Defence of India Act; General Clauses Act, 1897; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 127(1), 217, 217(1), 218D and 218D(1); Kerala High Court Act - Sections 5; Indian Succession Act - Sections

Reported in : 2009ACJ585; 2008(6)MhLj941

Court itself. Under Section 102 of the Code which was also amended by the Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, 2002 with effect from 1st July, 2002, no second appeal would be maintainable from any decree when the subject-matter … that Letters Patent is a word of definite legal meaning. It is derived from the latin words literae patents. The Letters Patent are so called because they are open letters, they are not sealed up, but exposed … , Gandla Pannala Bhulaxmi v. Managing Director, APSRTC and Anr. (iv) (1987) 62 Company Cases 504, Rev. C.S. Joseph and Ors. v. T.J. Thomas and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Bayer Corporation vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-22-2019

Subject : Education

ensuring the availability of the same in other countries. He relies on the Notes on Clauses of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002 as well as the Joint Parliamentary Committee Report pertaining to the insertion of Section 107A of the Act. … the enacting clause, saving clause, and proviso, taken and construed together is to FAO (OS) (COMM) 169/2017 Page 62 of 90 prevail.(Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, 10th Edn., p. 162)‖ 86. In S. Sundaram Pillai v V.R.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2004

P.S. Sathappan (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Andhra Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9), 3, 4, 4(1), 35A, 96 to 103, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 105, 105(2), 115, 117, 135, 217(1), 218D, 278 and 282 - Order 7, Rules 10 and 11 - Order 10, Rule 3 - Order 16, Rule 2 - Order 18, Rules 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16 - Order 20, Rules 1 and 8 - Order 21, Rules 72, 90 and 92 - Order 33, Rule 7 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 35 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 136, 225, 329 and 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; ;Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Legislative Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 223; India (Adaptation of Existing Laws) Order, 1949; Independence Act, 1947 - Section

Reported in : AIR2004SC5152; 2004(5)CTC209; JT2004(8)SC464; (2005)1MLJ105(SC); RLW2005(1)SC19; 2004(8)SCALE601; (2004)11SCC672

in the Code by reason of Code of Civil Procedure amendment Act, 1976 or Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, 2002. In any event the provision of Section 100A of the Code being not retrospective in operation, the right … all such laws. In Clause 35 of the Letters Patent, there was a clear provision that the Letters Patents are subject to the legislative powers of the Governor-General in Council. It was accordingly thought that the Code … this Act is subject to the provisions of Section 47 and Section 622 of the earlier Code which corresponds to Section 115 of the present

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2025

Anjuman Ishaat-E-Taleem Trust versus the State of Maharashtra and Othe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-01-2025

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.410

It is only in furtherance of its commitment to universal elementary education that Parliament enacted the Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002, introducing Article 21A and elevating the right to free and compulsory education for all children aged between 6 … qualifications for a person to be eligible for appointment as a teacher. 62. Pursuant thereto, NCTE vide Notification F.No. 61-03/20/2010/NCTE/ (N&S) dated 23 rd August, … ‘right to education’ under the Constitution. Charging capitation fee in consideration of admission to educational institutions, is a patent denial of a citizen’s right to education under the Constitution.” 77. However, in Unni Krishnan, J. P. v. … Act have to be complied with by all schools as defined in Section 2(n) of the RTE Act except the schools established and administered by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2025

C.Mangala Vijayalakshmi vs K.S.Kasimaris

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-2025

aggrieved by any decisionor order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … 53.Ms.S.Annalakshmi Jansi 54.Mr.R.Munusamy 55.Ms.P.Valliammal 56.Mr.R.Arunachalam 57.Mr.J.Karunakaran 58.Mr.M.Akbar Basha 59.Thirugnanam Mothilal 60.P.Sathyapriya 61.M.Nandinidevi 62.M.Deepa Sundaram (RR59 to 62 brought on record as LRs Of the deceased … by ASMJ & CKJ) Prayer in O.S.A.No.430 & 431 of 2001: Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent read with Section 483 of Companies Act 1/1956 to set aside the order passed in C.P.Nos.274, 199 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial