Advanced Search Results

Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. And Ors. Vs.monsanto Technology Llc and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Trade (GATT), including the Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement, India, inter alia, introduced the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, in June 25, 2002. This amendment altered the definition of “an invention” under Section 2(1)(j) to include the … progeny tissues thereof containing said polynucleotide sequence.67. By objections of the Indian Patent office, on 30.03.2006 of Monsanto‟s 58 claims - claims 1-40, 48-56, 57, 58 were rejected as not allowable under Section 3(j). Claim nos. 41-

M/S. Philips Electronics India Limited Vs. M/S. Asian Electronics Limi ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Judge The Honourable Smt. Justice Prabha Sridevan, Chairman &Amp; D.P.S. Parmar, Technical Member (Patents)

Bayer Corporation vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

ensuring the availability of the same in other countries. He relies on the Notes on Clauses of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002 as well as the Joint Parliamentary Committee Report pertaining to the insertion of Section 107A of the Act. … of patented inventions that are reasonably related to the development and submission of any information under the FDCA." 58. The Supreme Court further said "this [information]. necessarily includes preclinical studies of patented compounds that are appropriate for

Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Rep. by Its Chairman and Managi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7 Rule 1; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : 2012(4)CTC(IP)8; 2012(3)KCCR140(SN)

from 20th April 1998 which was initially valid upto 20th April 2005. However, with the enactment of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 and the framing of the Patent Rules, 2003, the plaintiffs patent bearing No.186857 has been subsequently extended for … Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. The failure to produce the assignment document as per Section 68 of the Act is fatal to the plaint and consequently, the plaint ought to be rejected under

Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Rep. by Its Chairman and Managi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : MRTP

Patents and Designs Act, 1911, Section 2;Patents Act, 1970, Sections 2(10), 5, 10, 13(4), 64, 104, 107, 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, Section 104-A ;Patent Rules, 2003- Original Suit and Counterclaim-Revocation of Patent- Process patent for ayurvedic poultry feed registered by … 2005, Indian Law on Patents did not recognise grant of patent in product. However, process patent was granted. 58. The subject matter of the suit is a process patent. It was obtained by the plaintiff on 20.4.1998.

Novartis AG Vs Venkata Narayana Active Ingredients Pvt Ltd

Court : Chennai

Subject to the provisions of this Act, the term of every patent granted, after the commencement of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (38 of 2002), and the term of every patent which has not expired and has not ceased to … referred to the answers to questions 12 to 14 and 31 to 58 regarding supplies made by the defendant to companies in Egypt. Referring to … of Original Side Rules and Order VII Rules 1 and 2 of CPC read with Proviso 1 to Section 7 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015, praying to

Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1), 6, 8, 10, 11, 11A, 11B, 12, 13, 14, 35 to 42, 47, 47(1), 47(2), 47(3), 47(4), 48, 57, 58, 64, 64(1), 64(3), 99, 100, 100(1), 101(3), 101(5), 103, 107, 156, 177 and 240; Patents and Designs Act, 1911; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Patents (Amendment) Ordinance, 2005; Patents Rules, 2003; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(23)

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR896; 2009(111)BomLR479

Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), which forms part of the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO). Thereafter, the Patents Amendment Act 15 of 2005 was brought into force by way of ordinance, namely, Patents (Amendment) Ordinance 2005 dated 26.12.2004 … (1) 0352.(2) Telemecanique & Controls (I) Ltd. v. Schneider Electric Industries SA 2002 (24) PTC 632 (Del) (DB). (3) Midas Hygiene Industries (P) Ltd. and … outside India in contravention of Section 39;(o) that leave to amend the complete specification under Section 57 or Section 58 was obtained by fraud.(p) that the complete specification does not disclose or wrongly mentions the source or geographical

P.S. Sathappan (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Andhra Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9), 3, 4, 4(1), 35A, 96 to 103, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 105, 105(2), 115, 117, 135, 217(1), 218D, 278 and 282 - Order 7, Rules 10 and 11 - Order 10, Rule 3 - Order 16, Rule 2 - Order 18, Rules 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16 - Order 20, Rules 1 and 8 - Order 21, Rules 72, 90 and 92 - Order 33, Rule 7 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 35 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 136, 225, 329 and 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; ;Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Legislative Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 223; India (Adaptation of Existing Laws) Order, 1949; Independence Act, 1947 - Section

Reported in : AIR2004SC5152; 2004(5)CTC209; JT2004(8)SC464; (2005)1MLJ105(SC); RLW2005(1)SC19; 2004(8)SCALE601; (2004)11SCC672

in the Code by reason of Code of Civil Procedure amendment Act, 1976 or Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, 2002. In any event the provision of Section 100A of the Code being not retrospective in operation, the right … all such laws. In Clause 35 of the Letters Patent, there was a clear provision that the Letters Patents are subject to the legislative powers of the Governor-General in Council. It was accordingly thought that the Code … in the original side of the appeal would be governed by Section 588 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1861. The said contention was rejected

Anjuman Ishaat-E-Taleem Trust versus the State of Maharashtra and Othe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.410

It is only in furtherance of its commitment to universal elementary education that Parliament enacted the Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002, introducing Article 21A and elevating the right to free and compulsory education for all children aged between 6 … 995; T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka [2002] Supp. 3 SCR 587 : (2002) 8 SCC 481; Ahmedabad St. Xavier’s College Society v. State … ‘right to education’ under the Constitution. Charging capitation fee in consideration of admission to educational institutions, is a patent denial of a citizen’s right to education under the Constitution.” 77. However, in Unni Krishnan, J. P. v. … Act have to be complied with by all schools as defined in Section 2(n) of the RTE Act except the schools established and administered by

Durga Dal and BasIn Mills Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Civil

Acts : Jammu and Kashmir Levy of Tolls Act, Samvat 1995 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; ;Jammu and Kashmir (Excise) Act, 1958; ;Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; ;Motor vehicles Act 1988 - Section 58(1); ;The Levy of Tolls (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002; ;Jammu and Kashmir Levy of Tolls (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : 2004(3)JKJ365

vehicles, machinery, commodities and goods in any form whatsoever. The said Ordinance was replaced by Levy of Tolls (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act XL of 2002). The amendment has been given retrospective effect from 17-7-2002 which coincides with the date … S.N. Jha, C.J. 1. The dispute in this batch of letters patent appeals and one writ petition relates to levy of toll (sometimes loosely called toll tax) on goods and … tolls upon different roads and bridges in the Jammu and Kashmir State. Section 3 which is charging section of the Act, provides:(1) The Government may … issued by the registration authority under the Motor Vehicles Act. Under Section 58(1) of the Motor vehicles Act 1988, the central government is empowered to