Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: patents amendment act 2002 section 56 · Page 1 of about 365 results (0.066 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 11 2018

Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. And Ors. Vs.monsanto Technology Llc and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Trade (GATT), including the Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement, India, inter alia, introduced the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, in June 25, 2002. This amendment altered the definition of “an invention” under Section 2(1)(j) to include the … 44 to 47: A nucleic acid sequence“comprising...” and other dependant claims.  Claims 48 to 52, 54, 55, 56: A plant cell comprising a nucleic acid sequence comprising...(and other dependant claims)  Claims 53: A plant tissue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2007

Greater Bombay Co-op. Bank Ltd. Vs. United Yarn Tex. Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-2007

Subject : BankingConstitution

Acts : Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 2, 3, 17, 18, 31 and 34; Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions (Amendment) Act, 1965 - Sections 56; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(6), 2(10), 2(20), 18A, 36, 43, 44, 50, 55, 64, 72, 73, 78, 81, 83, 84, 88, 91, 91(1), 92, 94, 95, 97, 98, 101, 101(1), 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 156 and 161; The Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 22, 39, 40, 74, 83, 84, 99 and 101; Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Sections 2, 9, 19, 30A, 31, 31A, 35, 47, 47(2), 50, 51, 52, 61, 61(1), 62, 63, 64, 65, 70, 70(2), 71, 71(1), 71(2), 72, 73, 75, 76 and 77; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 2, 3, 5, 6, 20(2), 56 and 56(1); Banking Regulation (

Reported in : AIR2007SC1584; 2007(3)ALT1(SC); [2007]137CompCas63(SC); JT2007(5)SC201; 2007(3)KLT302(SC); 2007(3)MhLj434; 2007(5)SCALE366; (2007)6SCC236; 2007AIRSCW2325; 2007(3)AIRKarR406

of a Co-operative Society into a Multi-State Co- operative Society by an amendment in its bye-laws with the approval of the Central Registrar who shall … under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 [for short 'the MCS Act, 1960']; The Multi-State Co- operative Societies Act, 2002 [for short ''the MSCS Act, 2002'']; and the Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 [for short 'the APCS … by a co-operative bank for recovery of its debts. The Division Bench on consideration of the provisions of Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 [ for short 'the BR Act'] came to the conclusion that 'Co- … the Registrar on any claim or application of a Co-operative Bank, is patently and inherently without jurisdiction, null, void and inoperative.(j) During the pendency of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 2019

Bayer Corporation vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-22-2019

Subject : Education

ensuring the availability of the same in other countries. He relies on the Notes on Clauses of the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002 as well as the Joint Parliamentary Committee Report pertaining to the insertion of Section 107A of the Act. … judge were not taken into consideration and in fact, it has been held by the latter in paragraph 56 of the impugned judgment that:".... Even if it were to be believed that the patented invention once exported

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 09 2011

Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Rep. by Its Chairman and Managi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-09-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7 Rule 1; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : 2012(4)CTC(IP)8; 2012(3)KCCR140(SN)

from 20th April 1998 which was initially valid upto 20th April 2005. However, with the enactment of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 and the framing of the Patent Rules, 2003, the plaintiffs patent bearing No.186857 has been subsequently extended for … Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. The failure to produce the assignment document as per Section 68 of the Act is fatal to the plaint and consequently, the plaint ought to be rejected under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2011

Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Rep. by Its Chairman and Managi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-09-2011

Subject : MRTP

Patents and Designs Act, 1911, Section 2;Patents Act, 1970, Sections 2(10), 5, 10, 13(4), 64, 104, 107, 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, Section 104-A ;Patent Rules, 2003- Original Suit and Counterclaim-Revocation of Patent- Process patent for ayurvedic poultry feed registered by … has been made known to the public by a description in a work which has been publicly circulated.” 56. The patent is revocable under Section 64(1)(e) and Section 64(1)(f) of the Act if the patent is publicly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2008

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-16-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11B(1), 11B(3), 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(4), 25, 26(1), 43, 47, 48, 53(1), 64, 104A, 105, 106 and 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 48; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Motor Vehicles Act; Patents Act, 1949; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(8), 26(1), 51 and 53

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

at this stage of interim application, while considering the prima facie case and the balance of convenience, the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act 38 of 2002), which has come into effect from 20.05.2003 and Amendment Act 2005, which came into … the defendant in C.S. No. 1111 of 2007.2. C.S. No. 1111 of 2007 is a suit filed under Section 108 of the Patents Act, 1970 for the relief of permanent injunction in respect of the plaintiff's patent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2004

P.S. Sathappan (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Andhra Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9), 3, 4, 4(1), 35A, 96 to 103, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 105, 105(2), 115, 117, 135, 217(1), 218D, 278 and 282 - Order 7, Rules 10 and 11 - Order 10, Rule 3 - Order 16, Rule 2 - Order 18, Rules 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16 - Order 20, Rules 1 and 8 - Order 21, Rules 72, 90 and 92 - Order 33, Rule 7 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 35 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 136, 225, 329 and 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; ;Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Legislative Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 223; India (Adaptation of Existing Laws) Order, 1949; Independence Act, 1947 - Section

Reported in : AIR2004SC5152; 2004(5)CTC209; JT2004(8)SC464; (2005)1MLJ105(SC); RLW2005(1)SC19; 2004(8)SCALE601; (2004)11SCC672

in the Code by reason of Code of Civil Procedure amendment Act, 1976 or Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, 2002. In any event the provision of Section 100A of the Code being not retrospective in operation, the right … all such laws. In Clause 35 of the Letters Patent, there was a clear provision that the Letters Patents are subject to the legislative powers of the Governor-General in Council. It was accordingly thought that the Code

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2025

Anjuman Ishaat-E-Taleem Trust versus the State of Maharashtra and Othe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-01-2025

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025]9S.C.R.410

It is only in furtherance of its commitment to universal elementary education that Parliament enacted the Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002, introducing Article 21A and elevating the right to free and compulsory education for all children aged between 6 … Vasanta College for Women v. Tribhuwan Nath Tripathi [1996] Supp. 9 SCR 56 : (1997) 2 SCC 560; Food Corpn. of India v. Bhanu Lodh … ‘right to education’ under the Constitution. Charging capitation fee in consideration of admission to educational institutions, is a patent denial of a citizen’s right to education under the Constitution.” 77. However, in Unni Krishnan, J. P. v. … Act have to be complied with by all schools as defined in Section 2(n) of the RTE Act except the schools established and administered by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Vs. Woodward Governor India P. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-08-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 29, 30 to 43D, 48, 50, 56, 143, 143(1), 143(2), 144, 145, 145(1), 145(2) and 145(3); Finance Act, 2002; Companies Act - Sections 209; Finance Act, 1967

Reported in : (2009)223CTR(SC)1; [2009]312ITR254(SC); JT2009(5)SC378; 2009(5)SCALE198; (2009)13SCC1; [2009]179TAXMAN326(SC); 2009(3)LC1519(SC); [2009] 5 SCR 738

next contended that on a proper and true interpretation of the amendment to Section 43A, introduced by Finance Act, 2002, Section 43A is clarificatory. According to the learned Counsel, the occasion for the clarificatory amendment arose in view of … two different dates is taken into account. Section 145(1) enacts that for the purpose of Section 28 and Section 56 alone, income, profits and gains must be computed in accordance with the method of accounting regularly employed by … as regards capital assets for scientific research [Section 35(1)(iv)] and also regarding patent rights or copyrights [Section 35A].31. As held in Arvind Mills case (supra)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2025

C.Mangala Vijayalakshmi vs K.S.Kasimaris

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-2025

aggrieved by any decisionor order of the Company Law Board made before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, may file an appeal to the High Court within sixty days from the date of communication of the … by ASMJ & CKJ) Prayer in O.S.A.No.430 & 431 of 2001: Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent read with Section 483 of Companies Act 1/1956 to set aside the order passed in C.P.Nos.274, 199 of … 49.Mr.P.Rajendra Prasad Babu 50.Ms.Malleswari Nayagam 51.Mr.P.Raju 52.Mr.R.S.Soundar Rajan 53.Ms.S.Annalakshmi Jansi 54.Mr.R.Munusamy 55.Ms.P.Valliammal 56.Mr.R.Arunachalam 57.Mr.J.Karunakaran 58.Mr.M.Akbar Basha 59.Thirugnanam Mothilal 60.P.Sathyapriya 61.M.Nandinidevi 62.M.Deepa Sundaram (RR59 to 62

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial