Advanced Search Results

Span Diagnostic Vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Design and anr ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 83; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 8, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 25(3), 25(4), 27, 28, 29(2), 29(3), 37, 41, 42, 47, 51, 54, 57, 59 to 63, 66, 69(3), 74, 78, 84(1) to 84(5), 85, 86, 88, 88(3), 89, 91, 92, 93, 94, 96, 97, 116, 116(1), 116(2), 117, 117A, 117A(2), 117G and 158; Patents Amendment Act, 2002 - Sections 1(2), 18 and 47; Patents Amendment Act, 2005 - Sections 1(1), 1(2), 23, 60 and 61; Patents Amendment Act, 1999

Reported in : LC2009(1)22; 2008(37)PTC56(Del)

question of law afore-noted has arisen due to the amendments incorporated in the Patents Act, 1970 by the Patents Amendment Act, 2002 notified on 25th June, 2002 but various provisions thereof brought into force firstly on 20.5.2003 and the remaining … into force. 10. Relevant for my decision would be to note that vide Section 18 of the Patent Amendment Act 2002, Section 25 of the Principal Act was amended by introducing clauses 'j' and 'k' after existing clause 'i' as … under:Section 1(1)...(2) (ii) (a), and clause (b), of Section 37, Sections 41, 42, 47, 59 to 63 (both inclusive and Section 74 shall come into

M/S. Philips Electronics India Limited Vs. M/S. Asian Electronics Limi ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Judge The Honourable Smt. Justice Prabha Sridevan, Chairman &Amp; D.P.S. Parmar, Technical Member (Patents)

K K Bansal vs Koninklijke Electronics Nv

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

same submission before us.135. This submission cannot sustain, for the simple reason thatSection 107A(b) was amended, by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, with effect from 20 May 2003, to do away with the requirement of the dealer, from whom the … embodied in a chip. KUMAR RFA(OS)(COMM) 17/2018 and another connected matter Page 42 of 150(v) No evidence had been led to prove infringement, by the … PW-2/6 and PW-2/7 were never produced or proved. PW-2/6A and PW- Inasmuch as no application as required by Sections 63 to 6528 28 63. Secondary evidence.-Secondary evidence means and includes-(1) certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter

Rajesh Bansal vs Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

same submission before us.135. This submission cannot sustain, for the simple reason thatSection 107A(b) was amended, by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, with effect from 20 May 2003, to do away with the requirement of the dealer, from whom the … embodied in a chip. KUMAR RFA(OS)(COMM) 17/2018 and another connected matter Page 42 of 150(v) No evidence had been led to prove infringement, by the … PW-2/6 and PW-2/7 were never produced or proved. PW-2/6A and PW- Inasmuch as no application as required by Sections 63 to 6528 28 63. Secondary evidence.-Secondary evidence means and includes-(1) certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter

Shri Chandreshwar Bhuthanath Devastan of Paroda by Its Special Attorne ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (2003)105BOMLR915

100A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which has been amended by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 will be prospective in operation or retrospective in operation. The aforesaid Amendment was brought into force on 1st … on 1st July, 2002.2. The only issue which has been argued is whether any of the pending Letters Patent Appeals which have already been admitted by this Court are also covered by the said Section 100A as

Mahammed Saud and ors. Vs. Dr. (Maj) Shaikh Mahfooz and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2009Ori46; 2008(II)OLR725:AIR2009Orissa46

Order, 1948, this Letters Patent Appeal can be entertained in view of amendment of the CPC by the Amendment Act 22 of 2002 after 1st July, 2002.13. Before proceeding further, it would be prudent to quote the relevant … the Letters Patent Appeal was not maintainable in view of amendment of Section 100-A CPC against the judgment/order of a learned Single Judge. Similar view … a learned Single Judge of this Court in FAO No. 386 of 2007 is assailed in this Letters Patent Appeal. In the FAO an order of September 9, 2005 passed by the Ad hoc Addl. District Judge,

Mechano Paper Machines Ltd. Vs. Nepc Papers and Boards Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C) - Sections 39, 38, 60, 42; Companies Act 1956 - Section 617; Constitution of India - Article 225

execution or send the decree for execution to another court. But this conflict was set at rest by Amendment Act 22 of 2002 with effect from 1.7.2002, by adopting the position that if the execution is sought to … either by the court which passed it or by the court to which it is sent for execution. Section 42 of the Code indicates that the transferee court to which the decree is transferred for execution will have … has jurisdiction under the Rules framed by this Court under the Letters Patent as well as the Code of Civil Procedure to take step for

Mechano Paper Machines Ltd. Vs. Nepc Papers and Boards Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 38, 39(4), 60, Order 21 Rules 3 and 48; Companies Act, 1956 - Section 617,; Government of India Act, 1915 - Section 108; Constitution of India - Article 225

execution or send the decree for execution to another court. But this conflict was set at rest by Amendment Act 22 of 2002 with effect from 1.7.2002, by adopting the position that if the execution is sought to … either by the court which passed it or by the court to which it is sent for execution. Section 42 of the Code indicates that the transferee court to which the decree is transferred for execution will have … has jurisdiction under the Rules framed by this Court under the Letters Patent as well as the Code of Civil Procedure to take step for

Messer Griesheim Gmbh Vs. Goyal Mg Gases Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

suit in which such decree was passed”.32. Section 39(3) CPC was inserted by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1976 with effect from 1st February 1977 and by this time Section 44-A was a part of the … to record his disagreement at the Board meeting held on 27th May 2002 as recorded in the minutes of that meeting. That the 2002 Annual … the court executing a foreign decree in terms of Section 44-A CPC could never mean the High Court.33. Section 42 CPC talks of the power of a Court in executing a transferred decree and states that such execution … of original jurisdiction. At the time of enacting the CPC, the Letters Patent was already in vogue and, therefore, the expression ‘district court’ encompassed the

Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Intex Technologies (India) ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of rights in eight patents registered in India alongwith damages/rendition of accounts and delivery up etc.2. Alongwith the plaint the plaintiff has filed … claimed that the plaintiff is one of the largest telecommunications companies in the world. The Ericsson group is active in more than 180 countries having annual sales of USD35Billion (approximately) for the year 2013. The Ericsson’s main … being I.A. No.6735/2014 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC. By this order, I propose to decide the abovementioned application.3.