Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: patents amendment act 2002 section 33 · Page 1 of about 804 results (0.108 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 11 2018

Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. And Ors. Vs.monsanto Technology Llc and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Trade (GATT), including the Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement, India, inter alia, introduced the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, in June 25, 2002. This amendment altered the definition of “an invention” under Section 2(1)(j) to include the … patents and did not allow products of chemical processes to be FAO (OS) (COMM) 86/2017 & 76/2017 Page 33 of 60 patented. Section 3 (i)which existed under the original Patents Act excluded from patent protection: ―the following

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2008

Mohd. Riyazur Rehman Siddiqui Vs. Deputy Director of Health Services

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-25-2008

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 110, 110C, 140, 163A, 165 to 174, 175 and 176; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10F, 397, 398 and 483; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 71, 107 and 108; Specific Relief Act - Sections 6 and 6(3); Contempt of Courts Act - Sections 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Limitation Act - Sections 4 to 24; Defence of India Act; General Clauses Act, 1897; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 127(1), 217, 217(1), 218D and 218D(1); Kerala High Court Act - Sections 5; Indian Succession Act - Sections

Reported in : 2009ACJ585; 2008(6)MhLj941

Court itself. Under Section 102 of the Code which was also amended by the Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, 2002 with effect from 1st July, 2002, no second appeal would be maintainable from any decree when the subject-matter … of definite legal meaning. It is derived from the latin words literae patents. The Letters Patent are so called because they are open letters, they … referred to in Article 3 of Schedule 1 of the Bombay Court Fees Act is the provisions of Section 33 of the 1940Act and bare comparison of that provision with the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 34

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2009

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary and Others

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on : Jun-26-2009

Subject : Intellectual Property

providing Exclusive Marketing Rights (EMR). The Indian Parliament made further amendments in the Patents Act, 1970 through the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act 38 of 2002) which came into force from 20.05.2003 along with the Patents Rules, 2003 with a … 3, R 4, R 5, R 6 and R 7, respectively) filed representations by way of oppositions under section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 as amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as … - 2-hydroxy ethane -sulfonic acid.” Further, on page 25, Col. 19, line 33 of above ‘Novartis Vol A Compilation, Zimmerman Patent clearly stated that salts

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 03 2006

Dhanpat Seth and ors. Vs. Nil Kamal Plastic Crates Ltd.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-03-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 13(4), 48, 64, 107(1), 107(2) and 113(4); Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002; Trade Mark Act - Section 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 94 and 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2006(33)PTC339(NULL)

Matched in: Citation 2006(33)PTC339(NULL)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1981

Teja Singh Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-16-1981

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act - Schedure - Article 137; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 141; Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - Sections 33; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 141 - Order 1, Rules 1 and 8 - Order 2, Rule 3 - Order IX - Order 22 - Order 23, Rules 1, 3 and 4 - Order 27; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 225 and 226

Reported in : AIR1982P& H169

that under Section 141 of the Civil P. C. an explanation has been inserted by civil P. C. (Amendment) Act, 1976, which clearly goes to show that the expression 'proceedings' does not include any proceedings under Art. 226 … costs.39. Petition dismissed. - Sections 100-A [As inserted by Act 22 of 2002], 110 & 104 & Letters Patent, 1865, Clause 10: [Dr. B.S. Chauhan, … India. It appears that nothing tangible came out, with the result that the appellant preferred a petition under Section 33 of the Act challenging the order dated 17th Mar. 1961 of the then Settlement Commissioner cancelling the permanent … dismissed. The appellant filed an appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent, but did not succeed. Still dissatisfied, the appellant approached the Supreme Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2007

Subhashbhai Bhanabhai Patel and 3 ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and 2 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-03-2007

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 25(T), 31, 33A, 33(2) and 33(4); Gujarat Industrial Disputes Rules, 1967 - Rule 66(4); Trade Union Act, 1926 - Sections 22; Trade Unions (Amendment) Act, 2001; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR957]; (2007)3GLR2588; (2008)ILLJ1025Guj

of the substitution of new Section 22 in the Trade Union Act, 1926 as amended by Trade Unions (Amendment) Act, 2001 with effect from 3rd September 2001, as per explanation to Sub-section (2), the terminated employee shall not … therefore, filed a writ petition being Special Civil Application No. 6631 of 2002 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the month of … A.M. Kapadia, J.1. Challenge in the instant intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is to the judgment and order dated 26.12.2003 rendered in Special Civil Application No. 17984 of 2003 by … appellants were also declared to be 'protected workmen' as defined under Section 33(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ('the Act' for short) read with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2026

Novartis AG Vs Venkata Narayana Active Ingredients Pvt Ltd

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-03-2026

Subject to the provisions of this Act, the term of every patent granted, after the commencement of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (38 of 2002), and the term of every patent which has not expired and has not ceased to … of Original Side Rules and Order VII Rules 1 and 2 of CPC read with Proviso 1 to Section 7 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015, praying to … pronounced on 03.06.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY & A. No.3319 & 3320 of 2025 1.NOVARTIS AG, Lichtstrasse 35, 4056 Basel, Switzerland, Represented by its

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2007

Asha D/O Bhalchandra Joshi Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-12-2007

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(14), 4, 16, 17, 20, 96, 100, 100A, 110 and 115; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 23 and 30; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 110, 140, 163A, 166, 169(2), 173 and 176; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 54; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 12F, 397, 398 and 483; Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 18; Motor Vehicles Rules - Rules 275 and 276; Bombay Public Trusts Act - Sections 72; Letters Patent Act - 30, 70, 72, 72(1) and 108

Reported in : 2009ACJ223; 2008(1)ALLMR745; 2008(2)BomCR76; 2008(1)MhLj724

Section 100-A in the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 substituted by Section 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 takes away the right of Letters Patent Appeal on and from 1st July, 2002 in respect of the … referred to in Article 3 of Schedule 1 of the Bombay Court Fees Act is the provisions of Section 33 of the 1940Act and bare comparison of that provision with the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 34 … the tenability of this intra-Court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, we would examine whether such an appeal is tenable, in order to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2002

Vajara Yojna Seed Farm and ors. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court Ii ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-21-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh High Court (Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) Act, 1962; Uttar Pradesh High Court (Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) (Amendment) Act, 1981; Constitution of India - Articles 225, 226 and 227; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 9; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulations; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 48; Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 5

Reported in : (2003)1UPLBEC496

Act, 1962 as amended by U.P. Amendment Act 33 of 1972 were upheld and it was held … on Their Privy Council, as hereinafter provided.'23. The Letters Patent dated 17th March, 1866 were amended by Letters Patents issued from time to time. Clause 35 of the Letters Patent which is relevant for the present subject … Letters Patent Appeals) Act. 1962 as amended by the Uttar Pradesh High Court (Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals) (Amendment) Act, 1981. Sri Baghel referred to and relied on judgment of Apex Court in : [1996]2SCR224 , Firdosh Fatima … No. 1177 of 2001 has been filed.6. Special Appeal No. 416 of 2002, Virendra Kumar v. Presiding Officer, Central Government and Ors., and Special Appeal … Corporation against the reservation order dated 6.11.2001. The appeal was filed under Section 15(4) of U.P. Cane (Supply and Purchase Regulation) Act. 1953.10. Special Appeal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2004

P.S. Sathappan (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Andhra Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(9), 3, 4, 4(1), 35A, 96 to 103, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 105, 105(2), 115, 117, 135, 217(1), 218D, 278 and 282 - Order 7, Rules 10 and 11 - Order 10, Rule 3 - Order 16, Rule 2 - Order 18, Rules 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16 - Order 20, Rules 1 and 8 - Order 21, Rules 72, 90 and 92 - Order 33, Rule 7 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 41, Rule 35 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Constitution of India - Articles 133, 136, 225, 329 and 372; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; ;Indian High Courts Act, 1861; Legislative Act; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 223; India (Adaptation of Existing Laws) Order, 1949; Independence Act, 1947 - Section

Reported in : AIR2004SC5152; 2004(5)CTC209; JT2004(8)SC464; (2005)1MLJ105(SC); RLW2005(1)SC19; 2004(8)SCALE601; (2004)11SCC672

in the Code by reason of Code of Civil Procedure amendment Act, 1976 or Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, 2002. In any event the provision of Section 100A of the Code being not retrospective in operation, the right … all such laws. In Clause 35 of the Letters Patent, there was a clear provision that the Letters Patents are subject to the legislative powers of the Governor-General in Council. It was accordingly thought that the Code … a High Court would be subject to different rules as to appealability. 33. There is yet another aspect of the matter which shows that Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial