Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: patents amendment act 2002 section 3 · Page 1 of about 3,560 results (0.178 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 12 2007

Speaking Roses International Inc. Vs. Controller-general of Patents an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-12-2007

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 3; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR630; LC2007(2)75

that it falls within the mischief of Section 3(j) of the Patents Act, 1970 as amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 and that it is not an inventive step taken by the Petitioners in as much as 3 other

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2008

Span Diagnostic Vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Design and anr ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-01-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 83; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 8, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 25(3), 25(4), 27, 28, 29(2), 29(3), 37, 41, 42, 47, 51, 54, 57, 59 to 63, 66, 69(3), 74, 78, 84(1) to 84(5), 85, 86, 88, 88(3), 89, 91, 92, 93, 94, 96, 97, 116, 116(1), 116(2), 117, 117A, 117A(2), 117G and 158; Patents Amendment Act, 2002 - Sections 1(2), 18 and 47; Patents Amendment Act, 2005 - Sections 1(1), 1(2), 23, 60 and 61; Patents Amendment Act, 1999

Reported in : LC2009(1)22; 2008(37)PTC56(Del)

question of law afore-noted has arisen due to the amendments incorporated in the Patents Act, 1970 by the Patents Amendment Act, 2002 notified on 25th June, 2002 but various provisions thereof brought into force firstly on 20.5.2003 and the remaining … into force. 10. Relevant for my decision would be to note that vide Section 18 of the Patent Amendment Act 2002, Section 25 of the Principal Act was amended by introducing clauses 'j' and 'k' after existing clause 'i' as … effect the provisions of the said Amendment Act on 2 different dates. 3. As I would be referring to the date with effect wherefrom the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2002

Shri Chandreshwar Bhuthanath Devastan of Paroda by Its Special Attorne ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-18-2002

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (2003)105BOMLR915

100A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which has been amended by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 will be prospective in operation or retrospective in operation. The aforesaid Amendment was brought into force on 1st … repeal and savings of Code of Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Act, 1976 wherein specific saving is pertaining to Section 3 under Section 100A a limited saving pertaining to pending admitted Letters Patent Appeals. Whereas in the present Amendment … issue which has been argued is whether any of the pending Letters Patent Appeals which have already been admitted by this Court are also covered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 16 2008

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-16-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11B(1), 11B(3), 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(4), 25, 26(1), 43, 47, 48, 53(1), 64, 104A, 105, 106 and 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 48; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Motor Vehicles Act; Patents Act, 1949; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(8), 26(1), 51 and 53

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

at this stage of interim application, while considering the prima facie case and the balance of convenience, the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act 38 of 2002), which has come into effect from 20.05.2003 and Amendment Act 2005, which came into … the defendant in C.S. No. 1111 of 2007.2. C.S. No. 1111 of 2007 is a suit filed under Section 108 of the Patents Act, 1970 for the relief of permanent injunction in respect of the plaintiff's patent … that the threats held out by the defendant on September 1 and 3, 2007 that the plaintiff is infringing the defendant's patent No. 195904 and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2008

J. Mitra and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Controller of Patents and Desig. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Indian Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 8, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 25(4), 27, 28, 29(2), 29(3), 51, 54, 57, 60, 61, 63, 64, 66, 69(3), 78, 84, 84(1) to 84(5), 88, 89, 91, 92, 93, 94, 96, 97, 116, 116(1), 116(2), 117A, 117A(2), 117G and 158; Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 116; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 47; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 83; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 - Sections 23, 25 and 61

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC366(SC); LC2008(3)31; 2008(38)PTC6(SC); 2008(11)SCALE524; (2008)10SCC368

law and intended to create an appellate forum to hear appeals against orders passed by the Controller consequently Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 was promulgated on 25.6.2002. However, it was not brought into force immediately. It may be noted that in … available where such publication does not constitute an anticipation of the invention by virtue of Sub-section (2) or Sub-section (3) of Section 29;that the invention so far as claimed in any claim of the complete specification is claimed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 2011

Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Rep. by Its Chairman and Managi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-09-2011

Subject : MRTP

Patents and Designs Act, 1911, Section 2;Patents Act, 1970, Sections 2(10), 5, 10, 13(4), 64, 104, 107, 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, Section 104-A ;Patent Rules, 2003- Original Suit and Counterclaim-Revocation of Patent- Process patent for ayurvedic poultry feed registered by … Zigbir is a Drug/Medicine within the definition as contained in Section 2(1) of the Patent Act read with Section 3(a) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. This basic feature of the claim of the plaintiff’s attracts Chapter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2008

Mahendra Panmal Duggad JaIn and anr. Vs. Bhararilal Panmal Duggad JaIn ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-10-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Civil Court Act, 1869 - Sections 8, 16, 17 and 26; Bombay Civil Court (Amendment) Act, 1999; Maharashtra Civil Courts (Enhancement of Pecuniary Jurisdiction and Amendment) Act, 1977 - Sections 19; Bombay Civil Court (Amendment) Act, 1983; Bombay Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 1982 - Sections 3; Bombay General Clauses Act - Sections 7; Income Tax Act - Sections 27, 274 and 274(2); Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1970; General Clauses Act - Sections 6, 15Z, 15Z(1) and 15Z(2); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002

Reported in : 2008(6)BomCR699; 2008(4)MhLj803

made in the statute, for example, The Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 etc. It is true that no litigant has any vested right in a matter of forum but when … Court Amendment Act, 1983 which came into force on 24-2-1983, whereby the jurisdiction was raised to Rs. 50,000/- Section 3 of the Amending Act reads as under:3.(1) The amendments made by the Bombay Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 1982

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2009

U.P. Cement Vetanbhogi Sahkari RIn Samiti Ltd. Vs. Official Liquidator

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-18-2009

Subject : CivilCompany

Reported in : [2010]97SCL196(All)

follows:Appeals from orders.- Appeals from any order made or decision given before the commencement of the Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002, in the matter of the winding up of a company by the Court shall lie to the same … in Section 104(1) and incorporated Section 4 in the CPC. Thus now a specific exclusion was provided. After 2002, Section 100A reads as follows:100A. No furtherappealin certain cases.- Notwithstanding anything contained in any Letters Patent for any High … Single Judge under Rule 164 of Rules, 1959 hence both the Letters Patent Appeal as well as appeal under Section 483 of the Companies Act, … Arati Dutta v. Eastern Tea Estate (P.) Ltd. : AIR 1988 SC 325 and Maharashtra Power Development Corporation Ltd. v. Dabhol Power Co. [2004] 52

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2006

John George Vs. Stewards Association in India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-27-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act; Kerala High Court Act, 1958 - Sections 3(13) and 5; Privy Council Jurisdiction Act, 1949; Government of India Act, 1935; Federal Court (Enlargement of Jurisdiction) Act, 1947; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 38; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 100A; Land Acquisition Act; Motor Vehicles Act; Letter Patent Act; Adoption of Laws Order, 1950; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 372(1) and 395; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100A, 104, 104(1), 104(2), 109 and 110 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2007Ker57; 2006(4)KLT405

costs are made easy. - CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.[C.A. No. 5/1908]. Section 100-A [As substituted by C.P.C. Amendment Act, 2002]: [V.K. Bali, CJ, Kurian Joseph & K. Balakrishnan Nair, JJ] Applicability Held, Section is not retrospective. All appeals … Single Judge is to be treated as a decree, judgment or order passed by the Single Judge under Section 3( 13)(b) of the Kerala High Court Act and not as one rendered under the Land Acquisition Act or … (Enlargement of Jurisdiction) Act, 1947 read with Clause 39 of the Letters Patent (Mad) and Sections 109 and 110 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2012

M/S. Philips Electronics India Limited Vs. M/S. Asian Electronics Limi ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on : May-04-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Judge The Honourable Smt. Justice Prabha Sridevan, Chairman &Amp; D.P.S. Parmar, Technical Member (Patents)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial