Advanced Search Results

Carlos Alberto Perez Lafuente vs.uoi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

hand, and have considered the respective submissions.15. The deferred examination system was introduced in the Act by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002. Prior to that, all patent applications were required to be examined by the Controller of Patents under Section … counsels we consider it appropriate to extract the relevant portions of Section 11B of the Act and Rule 24B of the Patents W.P.(C) 4573/2012 Page 3 of 39 Rules, 2003 (The Rules). They read as follows:-"Section 11

Novartis Ag and anr. Vs. Mehar Pharma and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 24B

Reported in : 2005(3)BomCR191; 2005(30)PTC160(Bom)

nature of the impugned drugs of all the defendants, regardless of jurisdiction.4. Until the amendments made by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999, only a Process Patent was granted for a medicine or a drug. Old Section 5 was renumbered … much after the plaintiffs had introduced their GLIVEC in the market in 2002. It is submitted that the defendants' contention, to the effect that beta … for Patent shall be dealt with in the manner provided in Chapter IV (A). The first part of Section 24 (A) prohibits the Controller from referring the application under Section 5 (2) for examination under Section 12 (1)

Chemtura Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCivil

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 3, 8, 8(1), 8(2), 11A(7), 12, 13(4), 25, 47 and 48, 48(1), 48(2), 53, 64, 64(1), 68, 69, 107 and 156; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 80 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4; Patents Rules, 2003 - Rules 12(1), 12(3), 15 and 25

Reported in : 2009(41)PTC260(Del)

above quoted application has been examined under Section 12 of the Patents Act, 1970, as amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 and the first statement of objection of forwarded herewith the compliance. The documents noted in the margin are … to the General Manager, Railway Board, Member (Mechanical), Railway Board and the RDSO under Section 80 CPC. On 24th November 2008 the Advocate for the Defendant No. 2 informed the Attorney for the Plaintiff that Defendant No.

Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. And Ors. Vs.monsanto Technology Llc and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Trade (GATT), including the Trade- Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement, India, inter alia, introduced the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, in June 25, 2002. This amendment altered the definition of “an invention” under Section 2(1)(j) to include the … Monsanto‟s argument that its products cannot ipso facto be registered and secure protection under the PV Act. Under Section 24, varieties, other than essentially derived varieties can be given registration. The facility of benefit sharing then is conferred

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11B(1), 11B(3), 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(4), 25, 26(1), 43, 47, 48, 53(1), 64, 104A, 105, 106 and 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 48; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Motor Vehicles Act; Patents Act, 1949; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(8), 26(1), 51 and 53

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

at this stage of interim application, while considering the prima facie case and the balance of convenience, the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act 38 of 2002), which has come into effect from 20.05.2003 and Amendment Act 2005, which came into … the defendant in C.S. No. 1111 of 2007.2. C.S. No. 1111 of 2007 is a suit filed under Section 108 of the Patents Act, 1970 for the relief of permanent injunction in respect of the plaintiff's patent … for revocation of the applicant's patent before the IPAB, Chennai even on 24.08.2007, the applicant has taken four months time to file reply, but has

Mohd. Riyazur Rehman Siddiqui Vs. Deputy Director of Health Services

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 110, 110C, 140, 163A, 165 to 174, 175 and 176; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 2002; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1999; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10F, 397, 398 and 483; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 71, 107 and 108; Specific Relief Act - Sections 6 and 6(3); Contempt of Courts Act - Sections 19, 19(1) and 19(2); Limitation Act - Sections 4 to 24; Defence of India Act; General Clauses Act, 1897; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Second Amendment) Act, 2002; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 127(1), 217, 217(1), 218D and 218D(1); Kerala High Court Act - Sections 5; Indian Succession Act - Sections

Reported in : 2009ACJ585; 2008(6)MhLj941

Court itself. Under Section 102 of the Code which was also amended by the Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, 2002 with effect from 1st July, 2002, no second appeal would be maintainable from any decree when the subject-matter … of definite legal meaning. It is derived from the latin words literae patents. The Letters Patent are so called because they are open letters, they … the Tribunal constituted under the M.V. Act is a Court subordinate to the High Court in terms of Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, The Karnataka High Court in Mrs. Noreen R. Srikantaiah v. L. Dasarath

Novartis Ag Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property

Act of 1999 thus complied with Article 70(8) and (9) of the TRIPS Agreement.68. Three years later the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act No.38 of 2002) came to be enacted on June 25, 2002. It brought large scale amendments in … Alam, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.3. What is the true import of section 3(d) of the Patents Act, 1970?. How does it interplay with clauses (j) and (ja) of section 2(1)?. … grant of exclusive marketing rights (EMR) for the subject product under section 24A of the Act, which was at that time on the statute book

Novartis Ag and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 3(d)(b), 2(1)(d), 133, 24(A), 25(1), 2(8)(10), 14, 5, 10; Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - Section 20(1); Patents and Designs Act, 1911

Act of 1999 thus complied with Article 70(8) and (9) of the TRIPS Agreement.68. Three years later the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act No. 38 of 2002) came to be enacted on June 25, 2002. It brought large scale amendments … Alam, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.3. What is the true import of section 3(d) of the Patents Act, 1970?How does it interplay with clauses (j) and (ja) of section 2(1)? Does … grant of exclusive marketing rights (EMR) for the subject product under section 24A of the Act, which was at that time on the statute book

Ajanta Pharma Limited Vs. the Controller General of Patents and Others

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Land Acquisition

the opposition to the grant of patent. It is also to be noted that section 47 of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 states that “for chapter XIX of the principal Act, the following chapter shall be substituted, namely, Chapter XIX … Board after due consideration of the affidavit and directed the appellant to appear before this Appellate Board on 24.07.2007. 6. The appeal FAO 136 of 2007 transferred from the High Court of Delhi has been renumbered as

M/S. Philips Electronics India Limited Vs. M/S. Asian Electronics Limi ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Judge The Honourable Smt. Justice Prabha Sridevan, Chairman &Amp; D.P.S. Parmar, Technical Member (Patents)