Advanced Search Results
Ashiq Miyan and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
May-01-1968
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 9 and 20G; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 251A and 252; Constitution of India - Article 136
AIR1969SC4; 1968(16)BLJR965; 1969CriLJ239; 1969MHLJ245(SC); [1969]1SCR188
Madhya Pradesh High Court, confirming their conviction, under Section 120B, I. P. C, and Section 9(a), of the Opium Act, 1878 (Act 1 of 1878), (hereinafter called the Act). Appellants 2 and 3 are the sons of the first
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Ramapuram Ayyanna
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-08-1961
Criminal
Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 3, 4 and 9; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 424 and 439
AIR1963AP334; 1963CriLJ249
If any, paid shall be refunded. (i) Criminal - proof - Sections 9 (a), 3 and 4 of Opium Act, 1878 and Sections 439 and 424 of Criminal Procedure Code,1898 - opium allegedly recovered from accused and accused punished … on the file of the said Court.2. The petitioner herein was charged before theSecond Addl. Munsif-Magistrate, Vijayawada under Section 9(a)of the Opium Act (1 of 1878) and convicted of that chargeand sentenced to four months' simple imprisonment and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Punjab Vs. Dara
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-14-1976
Criminal
1976CriLJ1226
recovered from an accused person falls within the definition of 'opium' as contained in Section 3 of the Opium Act, 1878, or not. Under that provision, 'opium' means-3. Interpretation-clause - In this Act. unless there be something repugnant in … opium on the respondent.8. For the reasons aforementioned, we allow this appeal and convict the respondent under Section 9(a) of the Opium Act, 1878. Since the occurrence took place in 1970 and the respondent was acquitted in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jaggi @ Jagdish S/O Ramprasad Vs. State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-12-1996
Criminal
Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 9 and 10
1997(2)MPLJ433
was having the knowledge of such secret chamber and the opium which was stored in it.6. Section 9, Opium Act, 1878 requires the prosecution to prove the possession of opium against accused in a trial. Even presumption which has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Booti Nath
Himachal Pradesh
Feb-23-1956
Criminal
Arms Act, 1878 - Section 19; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 5; ;Opium Act, 1878 - Section 9
AIR1956HP26,1956CriLJ747
first class, Nahan, in cases 26/3 and 27/3 of 1953 under Section 19(f), Arms Act, and Section 9, Opium Act, 1878, respectively. The appeals arise under the following circumstances:2. On 31-3-1953, the Ambala police, with the assistance of Nahan
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRidmal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
Feb-04-1994
Criminal
Opium Act, 1878 - Section 9
1994Supp(3)SCC98
modification of sentence, the appeal is dismissed. - [K. Jayachandra Reddy,; G.N. Ray and; N.P. Singh, JJ.] -- Opium Act, 1878 - Section. 9 - Opium - Proof of - Statement of Station House Officer that he tasted and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmreek Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Nov-30-1989
Criminal
Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 9 and 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
1992CriLJ2914; 1989(2)WLN331
affirmed the conviction of each of the accused-petitioners under Section 120B, IPC read with Section 9 of the Opium Act, 1878 (for short, the Act), but reduced the sentence of each of the accused-petitioners to two years rigorous imprisonment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askishwar Chandra Singh Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Mar-23-1910
Criminal
(1910)ILR37Cal581
The petitioner in this case was charged with having sold opium in contravention of the provisions of the Opium Act, 1878, and the rules framed thereunder. This is, of course, a charge of an offence under Section 9, Clause
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinder SaIn Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
May-04-1973
Criminal
Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 9 and 10
AIR1973SC2309; 1973CriLJ1537; (1973)2SCC372; [1974]1SCR215; 1973(5)LC694(SC)
extent indicated but dismissed in all other respects. Criminal - mens rea - Sections 9 and 10 of Opium Act, 1878 - appeal against conviction for possessing opium a contraband substance under Act - whether prosecution required to prove … K.K. Mathew, J.1. The appellant was charged by the Chief Judicial Magistrate. Sangrur, with an offence under Section 9(a) of the Opium Act. He was found guilty of the offence and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMukbul Ali Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Jul-30-1920
Right to Information
59Ind.Cas.133
1. The petitioner in this case has been convicted under Section 9, Clause (c), of the Opium Act, 1878, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for two months and a fine of Rs. 100.2. The petitioner is a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »