Advanced Search Results

Arun Kambli Vs. State of Goa as Represented by Officer-in-charge

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 27 and 54; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 144; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 315, 428 and 464; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 5, 8, 9 and 10; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 4(1); Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 29; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 66(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR654; 2000BomCR(Cri)654; 2000(1)MhLj780

came up for construction before the Apex Court with reference to section 9(a) and section 10 of the Opium Act, 1878 in Inder Sain v. State of Punjab, : 1973CriLJ1537 . Sections 9 and 10 of the Opium Act … is punishable under section 20(b)(ii) of the said Act. The appellant had pleaded not guilty. Prosecution had examined 4 witnesses in support of the charge. By impugned judgment dated 24th February 1999, which is subject matter of

In Re: Ramapuram Ayyanna

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 3, 4 and 9; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 424 and 439

Reported in : AIR1963AP334; 1963CriLJ249

If any, paid shall be refunded. (i) Criminal - proof - Sections 9 (a), 3 and 4 of Opium Act, 1878 and Sections 439 and 424 of Criminal Procedure Code,1898 - opium allegedly recovered from accused and accused punished … In fact opium, and that it conformed to the type of opium, the possession whereof is prohibited under Section 4 of the Opium Act. (I of 1878); Secondly, she claimed that there Is no satisfactory proof that the

State of Rajasthan Vs. Sohansingh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ1134; 1976(9)WLN13

perhaps be not up-rooted. The case was also not a cognizable one.5. Now. coming to Section 9 of Opium Act, 1878 (Central Act No. 1 of 1878), one will find that it provides for punishment for possession, transport, import … M.L. Jain, J.1. This appeal has arisen in the following manner.2. Excise Inspector, Phalodi, namely, Khanusingh P.W. 4 and Excise Inspector Banwarilal P.W. 1 checked the field of Sohansingh respondent in village Chhoti Sewahi, Tehsil Osian

Puranmall Agarwalla Vs. the State of Orissa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 4 and 9; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1890 - Sections 35; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 71;

Reported in : AIR1958SC935; 1958CriLJ1432; [1959]1SCR1162

rigorous imprisonment for three months under each count, the sentences to run consecutively. 4. Section 4 of the Opium Act, 1878 (Act I of 1878) reads as follows : 'Except as permitted by this Act, or by any other

Kasinath Poddar and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 4 and 9; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sectiona 2 and 7(2); Dangerous Drugs (Import, Export and Transhipment) Rules, 1933 - Rules 4(1) and 11; Orissa Opium Rules, 1937 - Rules 8(4) and 9(4); Orissa Dangerous Drugs Rules, 1937 - Rule 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1957Ori93; 23(1957)CLT217; 1957CriLJ527

the judgment of the trial court, but maintaining the conviction of the petitioners under Section 9(a) of the Opium Act (Act I of 1878) for unlawful possession of 32 bags of poppy capsules. The Excise Sub-Inspector of Dhenkanal … Section 3(1) of the Opium Act the definition of the expression 'opium' includes 'capsules of the poppy'. But Section 4 of that Act prohibits unlawful possession of opium. 'Except as permitted by this Act or by any other

NalaIn Padmanabham Vs. Sait Badrinadh Sarda and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1912)ILR35Mad582

are of opinion, that the conclusion arrived at by the lower Court is right. Section 4 of the Opium Act (Act I of 1878) runs as follows; 'Except as permitted by this Act, or by any other enactment

Organon (India) Ltd. (Now Known as Infar (India) Ltd. and Another Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 5 and 7; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 141, 245, 301, 303, 305 and 372; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 34, 59 and 82; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 3A; Dangerous Drugs (Import, Export and Transshipment) Rules, 1957 - Rules 2(2), 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 17; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 292; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3(1); M.P. Poppy Husk Rules, 1959 - Rules 3A, 5, 6 and 8; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Mines & Minerals (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1994SC2489; JT1994(4)SC438; 1994(3)SCALE421; 1995Supp(1)SCC53; [1994]Supp2SCR50

ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. In these appeals, validity of Section 5 of the Opium Act, 1878 and of certain Rules made thereunder by the Madhya Pradesh Government is called in question. Though the Opium … substantive provisions central to both enactments, in so far as opium is concerned, the following is the position :Section 4 of the Opium Act (notwithstanding the heading of the section which does not appear to have been amended

L. Shiv Dayal L. Mela Mal and ors. Vs. Firm Bishan Dass Shankar Dass

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 5; Punjab Opium Orders, 1956 - Order 59(1); Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1961P& H405

buying or selling opium or poppy heads or doing any other act in contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Opium Act No. 1 of 1878. They had merely contributed towards the capital of the business … contravened the provisions of Section 23 of the Indian. Contract Act and the various Rules framed under the Opium Act, No, 1 of 1878. In the second place, he contended that there could not be a valid partnership

The State Vs. Nilam Das and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(1), 155(2), 190(1), 403, 403(1), 417, 439, 439(5) and 529; ;Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 9 and 14 to 21; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 57 and 81

Reported in : AIR1952HP74

setting aside their convictions dated 19-3-1951 by the learned First Class Magistrate of Jubbal under Section 9 (a), Opium Act (I [1] of 1878) for illicit possession of 9 seers and 1 chatak of crude hill opium and … Section 1 relates to the title, extent and commencement of the Act. Section 3 is the interpretation clause. Section 4 enumerates certain prohibitions except as permitted by the Act etc., including the one relating to possession of opium

L. Arjan Das Duggal and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Punjab Opium (Restriction on Oral Consumption) Rules, 1957; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 19(1), 25(2) and 47

Reported in : AIR1958P& H400

the Punjab Opium (Restriction on Oral Consumption) Rules promulgated by the Punjab Government under Section 5 of the Opium Act (Central Act I of 1878) and published in the Punjab Gazette dated 8-2-1957. Originally these rules were to … the Rules and the particular provisions which are alleged to be invalid on one or the other grounds. Section 4 of the Opium Act prohibits possession, transport, import or export or sale of opium unless permitted by the