Advanced Search Results

Kalekhan Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 9, 10, 18, 25 and 35; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 154, 313, 313(1) and 313(3); Evidence Act - Sections 8; Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 21 and 22, 22A, 22A(1) and 22B; ;Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 10

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1119

2309: (1973 Cri LJ 1537) had occasion to deal with the presumption arrising Under Section 10 of the Opium Act 1878, discussing the case law on the point the Supreme Court observed as follows (para 17):'In other words, when … regard to an offence Under Section 21 of the Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 has been introduced in Section 22 of the said Act. The Supreme Court dealing with this provision in the aforesaid case has observed as

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, it was noted that … Ruma Pal, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant is under trial for offences alleged to have bene committed under Sections 21 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (referred to hereafter as the

Amar Chandra Chakraborty Vs. the Collector of Excise, Government of Tr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 47 and 226; Bengal Excise Act, 1909 - Sections 22, 22(1), 42, 42(1), 43, 43(1), 43(3) and 86; Tripura Excise Rules, 1962 - Rules 22(4) and 164-A; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 3; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167; Opium Act, 1878

Reported in : AIR1972SC1863; (1972)2SCC442; [1973]1SCR533

to such person by, or by the authority of the Chief Commissioner under this Act, or under the Opium Act, 1878 (I of 1878).(3) The holder of a license, permit or pass shall not be entitled to any compensation … of his application dated November 6, 1967 without issuing a public notice as required by the proviso to Section 22(1) of the Act. This violation of the statutory provision invalidated the contract or the privilege of selling country

Commissioner Excise and anr. Vs. Manoj Ali and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 34, 54 and 58; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Opium Act, 1878; Rajasthan Excise Rules - Rule 22; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 482 to 489

Reported in : 2006(112)ECC276; 2006LC276(SC); JT2006(9)SC391; 2006(10)SCALE516

Act or any other law for the time being in force relating to excise, revenue or under the Opium Act, 1878 (Central Act 1 of 1878).(3). The holder of a licence, permit or pass shall not be entitled to … the erstwhile licensee was under a statutory obligation in terms of Rule 22 to make a declaration as to whether any stock was held by … liable for a thing found in the Godown sanctioned to him and on this ground the case Under Section 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act read with Section 58 (c) of the Act has been registered against the

Toddy Co-operative Society, Toddy Group of Khammam, Rep. by Its Presid ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 13, 15, 28, 29, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 37, 63 and 64; ;Opium Act, 1878; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; ;Abkari Act; ;A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Section 35(2); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 272; ;Constitution of India - Article 14 and 19(1); ;Andhra Pradesh Excise (Grant of Licence to sell toddy, conditions of Licence and tapping of excise trees) Rules, 2007; ;A.P. Excise (Tapping of trees and toddy slops--special conditions of licence) Rules, 1969 - Rules 4, 4(2), 11, 22, 24 and 39

Reported in : 2010(3)ALT134

may cancel any other licence granted or permit issued to such persons under this Act, or under the Opium Act, 1878.(3) x x x xSection 37 prescribes penalties for adulteration of intoxicants by the licensed vendor or manufacturer. … of TCS, Khammam Nos. 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 to 20 should not be cancelled under Section 31(2) of the A.P. Excise Act, 1968 and orders of the Government dt. 9-11-2009 dismissing the revision petition … seeking writs of certiorari calling for records pertaining to showcause notice dt. 22-3-2007 as to why toddy shop of TCS, Khammam Nos. 1, 3, 6,

AmIn Shariff Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1934Cal580,150Ind.Cas.561

would say that an officer investigating an offence under the Excise Act., 5 of 1909 or under the Opium Act, 1878 is a police officer within the meaning of Section 25, Evidence Act. - … the Opium Act (13 of 1857) there are also similar provisions, e.g., see Sections 22, 23 and 24. Section 22 enjoined land-holders and others to give information of illegal cultivation of poppy to the Police or Abkari Darogas

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the passage of time and … fine which may extend to then thousand rupees or with both; or 22 (b) where the contravention involves quantity lesser than commercial quantity but greater … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, lays down :Notwithstanding such … deals with procedure for sending opium delivered by a cultivator and suspected to be adulterated. As per Rule 22 if it is found to be adulterated on examination by the Chemical Examiner in the Government Opium Factory,

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Kanhaiyalal Bhuwanilal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 3 and 9; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1964MP11; 1964CriLJ44; 1963MPLJ830

the question we have first to refer to the definition of the term 'Opium'. Section 3 of the Opium Act, 1878, defines 'Opium' as follows:Section 3.'In this Act, unless there be something repugnant in the subject or context, -- … relying upon the decision in Criminal' Revn. No. 269 of 1961 Kalian v. State of Madhya Pradesh D/~ 22-11-1961 (MP), that as the prosecution had failed to prove the percentage of morphine by chemical analysis as required

Narcotics Control Bureau versus Kashif

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1406

Interpretation of Statutes, Tenth Edition. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, 2022. List of … of 2024) 20 December 2024 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes† Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 … Kashif and six other accused, for the offences punishable under Section 8, 22(c), 23(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. 4. The Respondent - Accused