Advanced Search Results

Natibabu Khadka Vs. State of Goa, as Represented by the Anti Narcotic ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20 and 54; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 10

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR76

not necessary for the prosecution to establish conscious possession. This was a case under section 10 of the Opium Act, 1878. In our opinion the language of sections 9 and 10 of the Opium Act, 1878 is somewhat different … appellant was accused No. 1 in the said Criminal Case. The appellant was charged with an offence under section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. At the trial of the said Special Criminal Case,

Mohammad Akhtar and ors. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 35 and 35(1); Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 9 and 10; Evidence Act - Sections 106; Motor Vehicles Act

Reported in : 1999CriLJ3779

of Punjab AIR 1973 SC 2309: (1973 Cri LJ 1537) the Supreme Court interpreted Section 10 of the Opium Act, 1878 which was as under :-10. In prosecutions under Section 9, it shall be presumed, until the contrary is … ORDERS.P. Khare, J.1. Appellants Mohammad Akhtar and Mohammad Ali Naved have been convicted under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act) and

Sau. Parwatabai W/O Gokulprasad Yadav [In Jail] Vs. the State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20, 42(1), 42(2), 50, 52, 52A and 57; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 311

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR3369

through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the passage of time and … Joshi, J. 1. The Appellant is accused in Special Criminal Case No. 22 of 1997 for offence under Section 20(b)(ii) A of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act.2. Police Inspector Mr. Pawade ordered to raid the house

Sunil Kumar Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 42, 50, 57, 60(3) and 63; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Opium Act, 1878; Madhya Bharat Act - Sections 11

Reported in : 2000(3)MPHT237

and Anr. (AIR 1967 SC 276) the Supreme Court considered the interpretation of these words used in the Opium Act, 1878. It was held that the use of the word 'shall' does not always mean that the enactment is … S.P. Khare, J.1. Appellant Sunil Kumar has been convicted under Section 20(b)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred to as the 'Act')

Ghisia and ors. Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 251A and 252; Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 - Sections 67; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 9; Rajasthan Excise (Amendment) Act, 1958 - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1959Raj266; 1959CriLJ1359

Revision No. 191 of 1958 before us the accused Mahendra Singh was convicted under Section 2 of the Opium Act (No. 1) of 1878 (hereinafter referred to as the Opium Act) for possession of a few seers of … Excise Inspector, in the one case under Section 67 of the Excise Act, and in the other, under Section 20 of the Opium Act, and that as the law stood at the time, these reports did not amount

Arun Kambli Vs. State of Goa as Represented by Officer-in-charge

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 27 and 54; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114 and 144; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313, 315, 428 and 464; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 5, 8, 9 and 10; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 4(1); Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 29; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 66(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR654; 2000BomCR(Cri)654; 2000(1)MhLj780

came up for construction before the Apex Court with reference to section 9(a) and section 10 of the Opium Act, 1878 in Inder Sain v. State of Punjab, : 1973CriLJ1537 . Sections 9 and 10 of the Opium Act … the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter called 'the said Act') which is punishable under section 20(b)(ii) of the said Act. The appellant had pleaded not guilty. Prosecution had examined 4 witnesses in support of

The State Vs. Nilam Das and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4(1), 155(2), 190(1), 403, 403(1), 417, 439, 439(5) and 529; ;Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 9 and 14 to 21; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 57 and 81

Reported in : AIR1952HP74

setting aside their convictions dated 19-3-1951 by the learned First Class Magistrate of Jubbal under Section 9 (a), Opium Act (I [1] of 1878) for illicit possession of 9 seers and 1 chatak of crude hill opium and … to any person whether a police officer or not.From the above analysis, as also from the contents of Section 20, it is further clear that the said provisions of Sections 14, 15 and 19 are mutually exclusive and

Jaladhar Sahu Vs. the State

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 20B(5); Orissa Opium (Amendment) Act, 1939

Reported in : AIR1957Ori39; 23(1957)CLT1; 1957CriLJ384

to search any building where there was reason to believe that opium was concealed in an unauthorised manner. Section 20 of the Opium Act of 1878 was amended by the Opium (Orissa Amendment) Act 1939 (Orissa Act II … and the petitioner Jaladhar Sahu for unauthorised possession of opium which was punishable under Section 9(a) of the Opium Act, 1878. The trying Magistrate convicted both of them and sentenced them to pay fines. On appeal the learned Sessions

Smt. Umrawati Devi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 37, 81, 82 and 82(1); Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT77(CG)

different laws were covering different fields relating to Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. The Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878, the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 and the M.P. Excise Act, 1915 were dealing with the possession and offences … Heard .1. Diary of Crime No. 1046/2000 of Police Station Chhaoni Distt. Durg, for the offence punishable under Section 20B of NDPS Act, perused.2. Learned counsel for the applicant without making any reference to the merits of … of Police Station Chhaoni Distt. Durg, for the offence punishable under Section 20B of NDPS Act, perused.2. Learned counsel for the applicant without making any

Nireswar Gogoi Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

any provision in the Assam Act regarding the procedure of investigation. Such a procedure of investigation under the Opium Act, 1878 is to be found under Sections 20 and 20-A to 20-1 of the Madhya Pradesh amendment of Section