Advanced Search Results

In Re: Ramapuram Ayyanna

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 3, 4 and 9; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 424 and 439

Reported in : AIR1963AP334; 1963CriLJ249

If any, paid shall be refunded. (i) Criminal - proof - Sections 9 (a), 3 and 4 of Opium Act, 1878 and Sections 439 and 424 of Criminal Procedure Code,1898 - opium allegedly recovered from accused and accused punished … any preparation containing not more than 0.2 per cent, of morphine or a manufactured drug as defined In Section 2 of the Dangerous Drags Act, 1930.' Section 4 prohibits, among other things, possession of opiumand is in the

Organon (India) Ltd. (Now Known as Infar (India) Ltd. and Another Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 5 and 7; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 141, 245, 301, 303, 305 and 372; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 34, 59 and 82; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 3A; Dangerous Drugs (Import, Export and Transshipment) Rules, 1957 - Rules 2(2), 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 17; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 292; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3(1); M.P. Poppy Husk Rules, 1959 - Rules 3A, 5, 6 and 8; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Mines & Minerals (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1994SC2489; JT1994(4)SC438; 1994(3)SCALE421; 1995Supp(1)SCC53; [1994]Supp2SCR50

ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. In these appeals, validity of Section 5 of the Opium Act, 1878 and of certain Rules made thereunder by the Madhya Pradesh Government is called in question. Though the Opium … [The expression 'dangerous drug' is defined to include coca leaf, hemp and opium and all manufactured drugs - Section 2(h)]. It would be appropriate at this stage to notice the provisions of both the enactments insofar as they

Kasinath Poddar and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 4 and 9; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sectiona 2 and 7(2); Dangerous Drugs (Import, Export and Transhipment) Rules, 1933 - Rules 4(1) and 11; Orissa Opium Rules, 1937 - Rules 8(4) and 9(4); Orissa Dangerous Drugs Rules, 1937 - Rule 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1957Ori93; 23(1957)CLT217; 1957CriLJ527

the judgment of the trial court, but maintaining the conviction of the petitioners under Section 9(a) of the Opium Act (Act I of 1878) for unlawful possession of 32 bags of poppy capsules. The Excise Sub-Inspector of Dhenkanal … capsules on the 19-1-1954 and sent some of the capsules to the Chemical Examiner, Calcutta, whose report (Ext. 2) was to the effect that they contained ingredients of opium. P. W. 4 further stated that all the

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, lays down :Notwithstanding such

Phipson and Co. (P) Ltd. Madras Vs. the Government of Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madras General Sales-tax Act - Sections 3, 8, 20 and 21-A; Central Sales-tax Act, 1878 - Seciton 8(1), 8(2), 8(2-A), 8(4); Madras Prohibition Act, 1937; Opium Act, 1878; Sales-tax Law

Reported in : AIR1965Mad115; [1964]15STC740(Mad)

duty is levied or leviable under the Madras Prohibition Act, 1937, Madras Act X of 1937, or the Opium Act, 1878, Central act I of 1878, on the entire quantity of such goods and not merely on any ingredient … petitioner, referred to S. 8 of the Madras General Sales-tax act, which provides for exemption from tax. This section reads:'Subject to such restrictions and conditions as may be prescribed a dealer who deals in the goods specified … (P) Ltd. deals in foreign liquor. The turnovers in dispute are Rs. 28972.32 for 1957-58, Rs. 67607.94 for 1958-59 and Rs. 31047.80 for 1959-60. These

State Vs. Vidya Devi and Etc.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 37, 41, 41(1), 41(2), 42, 42(1), 42(2), 43, 44, 45, 48, 49, 50, 50(1), 51, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 52(3), 52A, 52A(2), 53, 55, 57, 58, 61 and 62; ;Opium Act, 1957; ;Opium Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Customs Act, 1962; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 4(2), 5, 156 and 190; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3556

14, 1985. It has repealed the following Acts:(a) The Opium Act, 1957 (Act No. 13 of 1957);(b) The Opium Act, 1878 (Act No. 1 of 1878); and(c) The Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 (Act No. 2 of 1930).6. A look … these cases the accused had either been discharged since the prosecution had failed to produce the notifications under Sections 41 or 42 and/or the trial Court had found that the provisions of Sections 50 and 55 of

Toddy Co-operative Society, Toddy Group of Khammam, Rep. by Its Presid ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 13, 15, 28, 29, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 37, 63 and 64; ;Opium Act, 1878; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; ;Abkari Act; ;A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Section 35(2); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 272; ;Constitution of India - Article 14 and 19(1); ;Andhra Pradesh Excise (Grant of Licence to sell toddy, conditions of Licence and tapping of excise trees) Rules, 2007; ;A.P. Excise (Tapping of trees and toddy slops--special conditions of licence) Rules, 1969 - Rules 4, 4(2), 11, 22, 24 and 39

Reported in : 2010(3)ALT134

may cancel any other licence granted or permit issued to such persons under this Act, or under the Opium Act, 1878.(3) x x x xSection 37 prescribes penalties for adulteration of intoxicants by the licensed vendor or manufacturer. … of TCS, Khammam Nos. 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 to 20 should not be cancelled under Section 31(2) of the A.P. Excise Act, 1968 and orders of the Government dt. 9-11-2009 dismissing the revision petition

Abdul Rahman and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1935Cal316,165Ind.Cas.497

Section 120 B, I.P. C, read with Section 9 a, b, c, d, Opium Act (Act 1 of 1878), Section 13, 14A and 19, Dangerous Drugs Act (Act 2 of 1930) Section 19(a) and (o) of the Arms … of 1930 which only came into operation on 1st February 1931; (4) that under the provisions of the Opium Act, 1878 even as amended in the year 1914, the maximum sentence provided for is one year's rigorous imprisonment, and

The State of Punjab Vs. Dara

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ1226

recovered from an accused person falls within the definition of 'opium' as contained in Section 3 of the Opium Act, 1878, or not. Under that provision, 'opium' means-3. Interpretation-clause - In this Act. unless there be something repugnant in … any preparation containing not more than 0.2 per cent. of morphine, or a manufactured drug as defined in Section 2 of the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930.5. If the preparation or a mixture of coagulated poppy milk contains more

L. Shiv Dayal L. Mela Mal and ors. Vs. Firm Bishan Dass Shankar Dass

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 5; Punjab Opium Orders, 1956 - Order 59(1); Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1961P& H405

contravened the provisions of Section 23 of the Indian. Contract Act and the various Rules framed under the Opium Act, No, 1 of 1878. In the second place, he contended that there could not be a valid partnership … Pandit, J.1. These are two connected Regular First Appeals Nos. 1 and 2 of 1955 filed by the defendants, arising out of two suits (Nos. 23 and 22 of 1954) which