Advanced Search Results

Organon (India) Ltd. (Now Known as Infar (India) Ltd. and Another Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 5 and 7; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 141, 245, 301, 303, 305 and 372; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 34, 59 and 82; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 3A; Dangerous Drugs (Import, Export and Transshipment) Rules, 1957 - Rules 2(2), 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 17; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 292; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3(1); M.P. Poppy Husk Rules, 1959 - Rules 3A, 5, 6 and 8; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Mines & Minerals (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1994SC2489; JT1994(4)SC438; 1994(3)SCALE421; 1995Supp(1)SCC53; [1994]Supp2SCR50

ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. In these appeals, validity of Section 5 of the Opium Act, 1878 and of certain Rules made thereunder by the Madhya Pradesh Government is called in question. Though the Opium … . It was contended before this Court that a rule made by the Government of Tamil Nadu under Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act providing that no lease for quarrying black granite should

Ravinder Kumar Vs Nct of Delhi (State)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Narcotic Drugs Nand Psychotropic Substances

Acts : Narcotic Drugs Nand Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 , sections, 18, 2(xv), 2(xvi)(c)

1. In that case, the Supreme Court examined the definition of opium contained in Section 3 of the Opium Act, 1878. The definition was as under:-"3. Interpretation-clause. In this Act, unless there be something repugnant in the subject or … means any quantity lesser than the quantity specified by the Central Government by notification in the Official Gazette."12. Section 15 provides for the punishment for contravention in relation to poppy straw. Sections 17 and 18 prescribe the punishment

Toddy Co-operative Society, Toddy Group of Khammam, Rep. by Its Presid ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 13, 15, 28, 29, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 37, 63 and 64; ;Opium Act, 1878; ;Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); ;Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; ;Abkari Act; ;A.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 - Section 35(2); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 272; ;Constitution of India - Article 14 and 19(1); ;Andhra Pradesh Excise (Grant of Licence to sell toddy, conditions of Licence and tapping of excise trees) Rules, 2007; ;A.P. Excise (Tapping of trees and toddy slops--special conditions of licence) Rules, 1969 - Rules 4, 4(2), 11, 22, 24 and 39

Reported in : 2010(3)ALT134

may cancel any other licence granted or permit issued to such persons under this Act, or under the Opium Act, 1878.(3) x x x xSection 37 prescribes penalties for adulteration of intoxicants by the licensed vendor or manufacturer. … granted shall extend and cover servants and other persons employed by the licensee and acting on his behalf. Section 15 prohibits sale or buying of intoxicant except under the authority and in accordance with the terms and conditions

Bombay Cycle and Motor Agency Ltd. Vs. Bhagwanprasad Ramragubir Pandey

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR612

vehicle was confiscated to the State.22. In this connection we may refer to a few decisions under the Opium Act, 1878 and one decision under Mysore Prohibition Act, 1948. In Manghcm Dass v. Bahim Bux A.I.R [1921] . Pat. … by the Calcutta High Court in Shaikh Abdul Rahaman v. The King-Emperor 15 C.W.N, 296. That was a case where a boat was confiscated, because … Malvankar, J.1. This is an application by Bombay Cycle & Motor Agency Ltd., under Section 561A of the Criminal Procedure Code, for setting aside the order regarding the disposal of property passed in

SabuddIn Sheikh Mansur Vs. J.S. Thakar and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 6, 7, 15, 16, 17, 17(1), 18 and 20; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 55, 56 and 57; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 39, 39(1); Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 39 and 245; Assam Opium Prohibition Act - Sections 16; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act - Sections 6(1)

Reported in : AIR1969Guj1; 1969CriLJ50; (1968)GLR142

'specially empowered'. This distinction was clearly pointed out in AIR 1915 Mad 1159, where Section 3 of the Opium Act, 1878, had to be interpreted,'However, so far as Savlaram's case, 49 Bom LR 798 = (AIR 1948 Bom 156) … from which this case comes. The power is conferred upon that officer in virtue of his office. Under Section 15 of the Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 (hereafter called the Clauses Act), where, by any Bombay enactment, a

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, it was noted that … accomplice and to examine him as a witness is to encourage perjury'. 15. It was in recognition of this need that the Code of Criminal … Ruma Pal, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant is under trial for offences alleged to have bene committed under Sections 21 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (referred to hereafter as the

Mithukhan Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 52, 97 and 99; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 165 and 165(1); Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 14, 15 and 16

Reported in : AIR1969Raj121; 1969CriLJ515

court.3. In this court learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that according to Section 16 of the Opium Act, 1878 (hereinafter called the Act), all searches under Section 14 or 15 are to be made in accordance with

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the passage of time and … legal penalty for violation.23.Sahai, J.in a separate opinion, concurring in part, but dissenting on the constitutional validity of section 15, referred to Article 20(3) as follows: “456. A confession is an admission of guilt. The person making it

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the passage of time and … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and claimed

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, lays down :Notwithstanding such … Nahan in Session Trial No. 11 -N/7 of 1990 dated 23-4-1991 acquitting the respondent-accused for the offence under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). This was listed