Advanced Search Results

Beckodan Abdul Rahiman Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9, 18, 31, 36, 41, 42, 42(2), 43 and 50; Opium Act, 1857; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1988

Reported in : AIR2002SC1810; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)952; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)356; (SCSuppl)2002(4)CHN47; 2002CriLJ2529; 2002(2)Crimes375(SC); 2002(81)ECC8; JT2002(4)SC68; 2002(2)KLT211(SC); RLW2002(4

the States also had enacted certain statutes with a view to deal with illicit traffic in drugs. The Opium act, 1857 related mainly to preventing illicit cultivation of poppy, regulating cultivation of poppy and manufacture of opium. The Opium … Sethi, J. 1. For allegedly possessing 11 gms. of opium without licence, the appellant has been convicted under Section 9(c) read with Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, … distinct and separate and conjointly both the Sections cover a very wide field. The rule making power under Section 9 excludes the matters covered by Section 8, which prohibits, except for medical or scientific purposes, cultivation of coca

Bahabal Shah Vs. Tarak Nath Chowdhry

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1897)ILR24Cal691

authorized to investigate.' The offence here was that of illicit cultivation of poppy, which is made punishable by Section 9 of the Opium Act,---and the question reduces itself to this, namely, whether that is an offence which a … before Mr. Justice Rampini, and which has been raised before us. Mr. Justice Rampini considered that under the Opium Act (I of 1878) the police officer had no authority to make the search he did.8. That was practically … by virtue of the provisions of Section 24 of Act XIII of 1857; and that, being a cognizable case, the police officer was authorized to

State of Rajasthan Vs. Sohansingh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ1134; 1976(9)WLN13

thirty-two rupees per bigha of land illegally cultivated.To my mind, the accused had contravened Section 21 of the Opium Act, 1857. Section 9 of this Act has nothing to do with the offence. The poppy plants could only be attached and

State of M.P. Vs. Gobarsingh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 9

Reported in : 1996CriLJ302

by which he acquitted the respondent of charge levelled against him for offence punishable Under Section 9(a) of Opium Act.2. The prosecution case was that one house situated in village Vishniya, Tahsil Neemuch, Distt. Mandsaur was raided on

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … the meaning of section 25 of the Evidence Act. The majority judgment of Raghubar Dayal, J.first set out section 9 of the Land Customs Act as follows: ““The provisions of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 (VIII of 1878),

State of Orissa Vs. Hari Behera and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 395; Constitution of India - Article 228; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 82(1); Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 3 and 9

Reported in : 1993(II)OLR591

case does not satisfy the ratio of Badku Joti Svant and subsequent decisions referred to earlier.'So far as Opium Act, 1857 and 1878 are concerned, they have been repealed after coming into force of the Act with effect from … 1986, prosecution report was submitted by the Sub-Inspector of Excise, Under Section 9(a) of Opium Act, 1878 along with 47 (a), Bihar and Orissa Excise … A. Pasayat, J.1. This is a reference by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puri (in short, 'CJM' Under Section 395 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1973 (in short, 'Cr PC).2. The background in which reference has

Gawrilal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 4, 9 and 16; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 165; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2370; 2002(5)WLC218; 2002(5)WLN340

16th July, 1987 passed in criminal original case No. 31/82 convicting the petitioner Under Section. 4/9 of the Opium Act and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for one year.2. Heard Mr. P.N. Mohnani, learned counsel for the petitioner

Great Legalisation Movement India Trust vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

number of Central and NEGI W.P.(C) 7608/2019 Page 3 of 11state enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … Great LegislationMovement India Trust under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the vires of Sections 8(b), 8(c), first proviso to Section 8, Sections 9, 10, 12, 14, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … opium partly in the free state and partly as salts (Thrope, IX, 99; Annett et al., Mem Dep. Agric India, Chem, 1921-23, 6-1; Merck Index, … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and