Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: opium act 1857 section 8 · Page 1 of about 41 results (0.035 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 26 1966

Balley Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-26-1966

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(6); Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 7 and 8

Reported in : AIR1967All341

opium or for seeds. With the enactment to the Opium and RevenueLaws (Extension of Application) Act, 1960, the Opium Act, 1857 was extended to the Pargana of Jaunsar Bawar. Section 8 of the Opium Act provides for the issue

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2001

Smt. Umrawati Devi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Feb-03-2001

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 37, 81, 82 and 82(1); Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT77(CG)

of NDPS Act, 1985, different laws were covering different fields relating to Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. The Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878, the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 and the M.P. Excise Act, 1915 were dealing with … sentence.10. After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, I am unable to hold that the provisions of Section 8, 20(b) and Section 37 of the NDPS Act would not apply to a case of possession of Ganja.11.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2001

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2001

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, … testimony will always be useful and witnesses will come forward because of the conditional pardon offered to them.' 8 27. The hope has been fulfilled by enacting provisions like Section 64 in the Act, Section 291 in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 24 1998

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-24-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, … Sections cover a very wide field. The rule making power under Section 9 excludes the matters covered by Section 8, which prohibits, except for medical or scientific purposes, cultivation of coca plant, opium, poppy, cannabis plant and also

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2024

Narcotics Control Bureau versus Kashif

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-20-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1406

Cited Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, Tenth Edition. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, … NDPS Act, Patiala House Courts, against the Respondent Kashif and six other accused, for the offences punishable under Section 8, 22(c), 23(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. 4. The Respondent - Accused filed the Bail Application being

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2020

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-29-2020

Subject : Right to Information

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … on three grounds, as follows: “24.1. The conviction is based solely on the purported confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act which has no evidentiary value inasmuch as: (a) The statement was given to … Advocate appearing for the Appellants in Criminal Appeal Nos. 152 of 2013; 836 of 2011; 433 of 2014; 77 of 2015 and 1202 of 2017,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1996

Ambalal Ranchhodji Thakor Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-15-1996

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1997)1GLR795

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878, and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … all fours. In the case of Kartar Singh (supra), Supreme Court has held, while considering the constitutionality of Sub-section (8) of Section 20 of T.A.D.A. Act as under:342. Sub-section (8) which imposes a complete ban on release on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2012

VipIn Nair and Another Vs. Gulam Mohammed Malik and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

was exercised in India though a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act,1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930, were enacted a long time ago. With the passage … Sessions Judge found Gulam Mohammad Malik (hereinafter referred to as ‘Accused No.1’) guilty for having committed offence under section 8 (c) punishable under section 20(b) (ii) punishable under section 31- A of the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Act,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2021

Gurdev Singh Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-06-2021

Subject : Education

control over narcotic drugs was exercised in India through number of Central and State enactments viz. - The Opium Act, 1857, (b) the Opium Act, 1878 and (c) The Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. However, with the passage of time … of Kerala, (2013) 11 SCC382and State of Haryana vs. Asha Devi, (2015) 8 SCC39 It is submitted that in the present case mitigating circumstances are … conviction and sentence passed by the Learned Special Court 2 convicting the accused for the offence punishable under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the Act”)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2022

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2022

Subject : Narcotics

to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … the year 1878, the Opium Act, 7 1992 SCC OnLine Guj 311 8 2007 SCC OnLinee HP1209 2013 SCC OnLine HP37114 1878 (for short, “1878 … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial