Advanced Search Results

Balley Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(6); Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 7 and 8

Reported in : AIR1967All341

opium or for seeds. With the enactment to the Opium and RevenueLaws (Extension of Application) Act, 1960, the Opium Act, 1857 was extended to the Pargana of Jaunsar Bawar. Section 8 of the Opium Act provides for the issue … AM v. State of Orissa, AIR 1955 SC 166; Kishan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1955 SC 795; Purshottam Govindji Halai v. B.M. Desai, AIR 1956 SC 20; Ram Chandra Palai v State of Orissa, AIR

VipIn Nair and Another Vs. Gulam Mohammed Malik and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

was exercised in India though a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act,1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930, were enacted a long time ago. With the passage … Sessions Judge found Gulam Mohammad Malik (hereinafter referred to as ‘Accused No.1’) guilty for having committed offence under section 8 (c) punishable under section 20(b) (ii) punishable under section 31- A of the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances … the truck abandoned the truck and ran away in darkness at about 7.45 p.m., on 12.01.2002. After couple of hours, the truck was brought to

Muhammed Mubashir V. P. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the nation. During the British regime control was kept on the traffic of dangerous drugs by enforcing the Opium Act, 1857. The Opium Act, 1875 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. However, with the passage of time and the … 57 of the NDPS Act. According to him, PWs 1 to 5, 7 and 12 were examined to prove that the actual weight of LSD … S.C. (NDPS) No.134/2019. The sole accused in the above case was found guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(A) and 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (For short, ‘the N.D.P.S Act’) and

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … ‘opium’ respectively. The learned AAG submitted that the High Court has wrongly 7 relied on the judgment of this Court in the case of Amarsingh … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … on three grounds, as follows: “24.1. The conviction is based solely on the purported confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act which has no evidentiary value inasmuch as: (a) The statement was given to … Criminal Appeal Nos. 152 of 2013; 836 of 2011; 433 of 2014; 77 of 2015 and 1202 of 2017, outlined six issues before us, which

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, … be possible, however, in order to succeed on this plea, the prosecution will have to satisfy the conscious 7 (conscience) of the Court that in the facts and circumstances of the case, it could not comply with

Harnek Singh Vs. the State of Punjab [Overruled] Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 17 and 30; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24

Reported in : 1999CriLJ635

November 14, 1985 vide S.O. No. 821(E), dated 14-11-1985. On coming into force, the Act of 1985, the Opium Act, 1857 (13 of 1857), Opium Act, 1878 (1 of 1878) and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 (2 of 1930) … the prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, while taking action against the petitioner. 7. Bribe is an illegal reward given to someone; briber is one who … 161A were incorporated in the proposed legislation with an enhanced punishment, it is not necessary to retain those sections in the Indian Penal Code. Consequently, it was proposed to delete those sections with the necessary saving provision.

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, … of the Act was echoed by this Court in Durand Didier V. Chief Secretary, Union Territory of Goa 7 when it said:'With deep concern, we may point out that the organised activities of the underworld and the

State of Orissa Vs. Laxman Jena

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 18, 42, 42(1) and 50

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)567; JT2002(5)SC1

the states also had enacted certain statutes with a view to deal with illicit traffic in drugs. The Opium Act, 1857 related mainly to preventing illicit cultivation of poppy, regulating cultivation of poppy, and manufacture of opium. The Opium … arrested. The trial court after recording evidence found the respondent guilty for the commission of offence punishable under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, 'the Act') and sentenced him rigorous

Narcotics Control Bureau versus Kashif

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1406

Cited Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, Tenth Edition. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, … of 2024) 20 December 2024 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes† Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 … v. Director of Inspection (Investigation) New Delhi and Others [1974] 2 SCR 704; State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh [1999] 3 SCR 977 : (1999)