Advanced Search Results

Balley Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(6); Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 7 and 8

Reported in : AIR1967All341

opium or for seeds. With the enactment to the Opium and RevenueLaws (Extension of Application) Act, 1960, the Opium Act, 1857 was extended to the Pargana of Jaunsar Bawar. Section 8 of the Opium Act provides for the issue … bill the cultivators tendered only 0.80 seer per bigha as against the then All India average yield of 6.87 seers per bigha of opium. This fact showed that the cultivators did not tender full quantity of opium

Bharat Aambale versus the State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.1524

453 - referred to. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs or Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Bill, 1988; Narcotic Drugs and … [J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Appellant had been convicted by the Courts below under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The issue was whether the conviction could be said … Cited Union of India v. Mohan Lal & Anr. [2016] 1 SCR 651 : (2016) 3 SCC 379; Noor Aga v. State of Punjab &

Smt. Umrawati Devi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 37, 81, 82 and 82(1); Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT77(CG)

of NDPS Act, 1985, different laws were covering different fields relating to Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. The Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878, the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 and the M.P. Excise Act, 1915 were dealing with … Heard .1. Diary of Crime No. 1046/2000 of Police Station Chhaoni Distt. Durg, for the offence punishable under Section 20B of NDPS Act, perused.2. Learned counsel for the applicant without making any reference to the merits of

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, … seizure of contraband. A Full Bench of this Court in State v. Vidya Devi (1993) 2 Sim LC 6 : 1993 Cri LJ 3556, expressed the view that (at p. 3564 of Cri LJ):.in a chance recovery

Binu Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, New Delhi and O ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

narcotic drugs in India was exercised through various Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted several years ago. These and other … reads as follows:- "4. The quantities shown in column 5 and column 6 of the Table relating to the respective drugs shown in column 2 … Ernakulam were dismissed by that Court holding inter alia that the buprenorphine seized was of commercial quantity attracting Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Exts. P1 and P2 are the orders dismissing the bail applications. Subsequently the

U.O.i. and anr. Vs. Sajeev V. Deshphande

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, three colonial enactments to some extent dealt with the legislative subject matter of the Act. They are Opium Act, 1857, The Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. Subsequently, various international treaties and protocols etc. dealing … prescribed also varies. If the quantity is small, the punishment extends upto 6 months. The expression “small quantity” is defined under Section 2(xxiiia)[5].. If the … 2-Judge Bench in State of Uttaranchal vs. Rajesh Kuamr Gupta (2007) 1 SCC355 Reference was also made of Section 80 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 which reads as under:“80. Application of the Drugs

Great Legalisation Movement India Trust vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

number of Central and NEGI W.P.(C) 7608/2019 Page 3 of 11state enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … Great LegislationMovement India Trust under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the vires of Sections 8(b), 8(c), first proviso to Section 8, Sections 9, 10, 12, 14, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, … 23, 24, 25, 27-31a, 37, 38, 40, 44, 46, 47, 48, 54, 60, and Entry 13 of the Schedule of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

VipIn Nair and Another Vs. Gulam Mohammed Malik and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

was exercised in India though a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act,1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930, were enacted a long time ago. With the passage … be detained and his office may be informed accordingly for further action. 6. On the basis of the information received, PW6 K.J.Sanchis directed PW2 Mohammad … Sessions Judge found Gulam Mohammad Malik (hereinafter referred to as ‘Accused No.1’) guilty for having committed offence under section 8 (c) punishable under section 20(b) (ii) punishable under section 31- A of the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances

Gurdev Singh Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

control over narcotic drugs was exercised in India through number of Central and State enactments viz. - The Opium Act, 1857, (b) the Opium Act, 1878 and (c) The Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. However, with the passage of time … case of Rafiq Qureshi vs. Narcotic Control Bureau, Eastern Zonal Unit, (2019) 6 SCC492has been relied upon. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant … conviction and sentence passed by the Learned Special Court 2 convicting the accused for the offence punishable under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the Act”)

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and … on the aforesaid issue. Vide a subsequent order of this Court dated 6th February 2019, the Union of India through its Secretary, Department of Revenue,