Advanced Search Results

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, … the appellant. The appellant opposed the applications before the Sessions Judge.5. The Sessions Judge by his order dated 4th October, 1990 rejected the applications of the respondent No. 1 after assessing the evidence sought to be adduced

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … clear that by a combined reading of Sections 41, 42, 43 and 51 of the NDPS Act and Section 4 CrPC regarding arrest and search under Sections 41, 42 and 43, the provisions of CrPC, namely, Sections 100

State of Rajasthan Vs. Sohansingh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ1134; 1976(9)WLN13

thirty-two rupees per bigha of land illegally cultivated.To my mind, the accused had contravened Section 21 of the Opium Act, 1857. Section 9 of this Act has nothing to do with the offence. The poppy plants could only be attached … M.L. Jain, J.1. This appeal has arisen in the following manner.2. Excise Inspector, Phalodi, namely, Khanusingh P.W. 4 and Excise Inspector Banwarilal P.W. 1 checked the field of Sohansingh respondent in village Chhoti Sewahi, Tehsil Osian

Bahabal Shah Vs. Tarak Nath Chowdhry

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1897)ILR24Cal691

before Mr. Justice Rampini, and which has been raised before us. Mr. Justice Rampini considered that under the Opium Act (I of 1878) the police officer had no authority to make the search he did.8. That was practically … by virtue of the provisions of Section 24 of Act XIII of 1857; and that, being a cognizable case, the police officer was authorized to … a 'cognizable case' within the meaning of Section 156. Cognizable and non-cognizable cases are defined in sub-section (q), Section 4 of the Code. 'Cognizable offence' means an offence for, and cognizable case' means a case in, which a

Bharat Aambale versus the State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.1524

453 - referred to. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs or Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Bill, 1988; Narcotic Drugs and … [J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Appellant had been convicted by the Courts below under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The issue was whether the conviction could be said … and seizure of the ganja at the instance of the accused. [Para 45] 2. Although Section 52A is primarily for the disposal and destruction of

Gawrilal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 4, 9 and 16; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 165; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2370; 2002(5)WLC218; 2002(5)WLN340

16th July, 1987 passed in criminal original case No. 31/82 convicting the petitioner Under Section. 4/9 of the Opium Act and sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for one year.2. Heard Mr. P.N. Mohnani, learned counsel for the petitioner

Muhammed Mubashir V. P. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

the nation. During the British regime control was kept on the traffic of dangerous drugs by enforcing the Opium Act, 1857. The Opium Act, 1875 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. However, with the passage of time and the … evidence as-:20:- Ext.P6. The total weight of LSD stamps was also found reported in Ext.P6 as 0.150 mg.Sub Section (4) of Section 52 (A) reads:- 52-A Disposal of seized narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances:- xxx “(4)Notwithstanding anything contained

State of Orissa Vs. Hari Behera and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 395; Constitution of India - Article 228; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 82(1); Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 3 and 9

Reported in : 1993(II)OLR591

case does not satisfy the ratio of Badku Joti Svant and subsequent decisions referred to earlier.'So far as Opium Act, 1857 and 1878 are concerned, they have been repealed after coming into force of the Act with effect from … Sub-Inspector of Excise, Under Section 9(a) of Opium Act, 1878 along with 47 (a), Bihar and Orissa Excise Act. 1915. Cognizance was taken accordingly, and … A. Pasayat, J.1. This is a reference by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puri (in short, 'CJM' Under Section 395 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1973 (in short, 'Cr PC).2. The background in which reference has

Narcotics Control Bureau versus Kashif

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1406

Cited Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, Tenth Edition. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, … of 2024) 20 December 2024 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes† Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 … and deserves to be quashed and set aside. [Paras 11, 23, 25, 40] Case Law Cited Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (Investigation) New Delhi

Smt. Santosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9A, 15 to 25 26, 27, 27A, 31A, 32A, 33, 37 and 39; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 32A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 21, 72 and 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 55; Customs Act; Terrorists and Destruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985; Prisons Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389, 432, 433, 433A and 438; Remission Rules; Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972

Reported in : 1998CriLJ612; 1998(1)WLC90; 1997(2)WLN375

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted along time ago. With the passage … maximum term of imprisonment of 3 years with or without fine and 4 years' imprisonment with or without fine for repeated offences. Further, no minimum … V.K. Singhal, J. 1. By this writ petition the provisions of Section 32A, of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 have been challenged.2. The petitioner is the wife