Advanced Search Results
Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-16-2001
NarcoticsCriminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860
AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(
Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, … hereafter as the 'Act'). The respondent No. 1. was a co-accused. The appellant has challenged an order dated 31.1.2000 by which the High Court upheld an order of the Central Government granting the respondent No. 1 immunity
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India
Oct-29-2020
Right to Information
is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … extremely important section is section 30, where even preparation to commit an offence is made an offence1. Under section 31, where a person is already convicted of the commission of, or attempt to commit, or abetment of, or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh
Himachal Pradesh
Feb-24-1998
Criminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54
1998CriLJ1829
commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, … the Government.20. In the rest of the Rules, there is no reference to Chemical Examiner. But in Rules 31, 33, 36 and 54, Government Opium Factories are mentioned. Rule 31 says that opium shall not be manufactured
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Beckodan Abdul Rahiman Vs. State of Kerala
Supreme Court of India
Apr-16-2002
Criminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9, 18, 31, 36, 41, 42, 42(2), 43 and 50; Opium Act, 1857; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1988
AIR2002SC1810; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)952; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)356; (SCSuppl)2002(4)CHN47; 2002CriLJ2529; 2002(2)Crimes375(SC); 2002(81)ECC8; JT2002(4)SC68; 2002(2)KLT211(SC); RLW2002(4
the States also had enacted certain statutes with a view to deal with illicit traffic in drugs. The Opium act, 1857 related mainly to preventing illicit cultivation of poppy, regulating cultivation of poppy and manufacture of opium. The Opium … Sethi, J. 1. For allegedly possessing 11 gms. of opium without licence, the appellant has been convicted under Section 9(c) read with Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as … minimum fine is Rs.1.5 lakhs which may extent to Rs.3 lakhs. Section 31(a) of the Act, which was inserted by the Amendment Act of 1988,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVipIn Nair and Another Vs. Gulam Mohammed Malik and Others
Mumbai
May-07-2012
Land Acquisition
was exercised in India though a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act,1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930, were enacted a long time ago. With the passage … ‘Accused No.1’) guilty for having committed offence under section 8 (c) punishable under section 20(b) (ii) punishable under section 31- A of the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short the ‘Act’) - for having been previously
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBinu Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, New Delhi and O ...
Kerala
Jun-09-2011
Land Acquisition
narcotic drugs in India was exercised through various Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted several years ago. These and other … Ernakulam were dismissed by that Court holding inter alia that the buprenorphine seized was of commercial quantity attracting Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Exts. P1 and P2 are the orders dismissing the bail applications. Subsequently the … if any but up to one half of the maximum or moreSec. 3121For subsequent conviction for specified quantity or narcotic drugs/psychotropic substances for a person
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo
Supreme Court of India
Oct-20-2022
Narcotics
to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … in the year 1878, the Opium Act, 7 1992 SCC OnLine Guj 311 8 2007 SCC OnLinee HP1209 2013 SCC OnLine HP37114 1878 (for short, … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Orissa Vs. Laxman Jena
Supreme Court of India
Apr-24-2002
Criminal
Criminal Law; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 18, 42, 42(1) and 50
2002(2)ALD(Cri)567; JT2002(5)SC1
the states also had enacted certain statutes with a view to deal with illicit traffic in drugs. The Opium Act, 1857 related mainly to preventing illicit cultivation of poppy, regulating cultivation of poppy, and manufacture of opium. The Opium … arrested. The trial court after recording evidence found the respondent guilty for the commission of offence punishable under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, 'the Act') and sentenced him rigorous … is Rs. 1.5 lakhs which may extend to Rs. 3 lakhs. Section 31(a) of the Act, which was inserted by the Amendment Act of 1988,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh, Etc. Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-21-1999
Direct Taxation
(1999)157CTR(SC)3
the States also had enacted certain statutes with a view to deal with illicit traffic in drugs. The Opium Act, 1857 related mainly to preventing illicit cultivation of poppy, regulating cultivation of poppy and manufacture of opium. Opium Act, … (1994) 3 SCC 299 : : 1994CriLJ3702 , a two-Judge Bench of this Court held that the above section is mandatory and it is obligatory on the part of the officer concerned to inform the person to … is Rs. 1.5 lakh which may extend to Rs. 3 lakhs. Sec. 31(a) of the Act, which was inserted by the Amendment Act of 1988,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh
Supreme Court of India
Jul-21-1999
NarcoticsCriminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 42, 50, 50(4), 51 and 54; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 51(2), 100, 102, 103 and 165; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 52
AIR1999SC2378; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)279; 1999CriLJ3672; 1999(65)ECC695; 1999LC545(SC); [1999(81)FLR303]; (1999)3GLR2483; JT1999(4)SC595; (1999)ILLJ254SC; 1999(II)OLR(SC)474; 199
of the States also had enacted certain statutes With a view to deal with illicit in drugs. The Opium Act, 1857 related mainly to preventing illicit cultivation of poppy, regulating cultivation of poppy and manufacture of opium. Opium Act, … was divergence of opinion between different Benches of this Court with regard to the ambit and scope of Section 50 of Narcotic Drugs and - Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter 'NDPS Act') and in particular with regard … is Rs. 1.5 lakh which may extend to Rs, 3 lakh, Section 31(a) of the Act, which was inserted by the Amendment Act of 1988,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »