Advanced Search Results

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, … Chief Controller of Government Opium and Alkaloid Factories. 16. Chapter III of the Rules comprising Sections 5 to 30, which is relevant, bears the heading 'Opium poppy cultivation and production of opium and poppy straw'. All these

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … made before any authority by an accused by any inducement, threat or promise, irrelevant in a criminal proceeding. Section 30 of the Evidence Act is to the effect that if a confession made by one or more persons,

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … bags each containing 40 Kgs. of ‘poppy husk’ and one bag containing 30 Kgs. of ‘poppy husk’ were recovered. From each of these nine bags, … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and

Ambalal Ranchhodji Thakor Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1997)1GLR795

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878, and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … H.M. Mehta with Mr. S.C. Patel were heard, as by amendment, the petitioner has challenged the vires of Sections 27, 37 and 52 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ('N.D.P.S. Act' for short).3. With the … and thereby committed the offence of murder within the meaning of Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code; the prosecution has to prove the ingredients

Beckodan Abdul Rahiman Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9, 18, 31, 36, 41, 42, 42(2), 43 and 50; Opium Act, 1857; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1988

Reported in : AIR2002SC1810; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)952; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)356; (SCSuppl)2002(4)CHN47; 2002CriLJ2529; 2002(2)Crimes375(SC); 2002(81)ECC8; JT2002(4)SC68; 2002(2)KLT211(SC); RLW2002(4

the States also had enacted certain statutes with a view to deal with illicit traffic in drugs. The Opium act, 1857 related mainly to preventing illicit cultivation of poppy, regulating cultivation of poppy and manufacture of opium. The Opium … Sethi, J. 1. For allegedly possessing 11 gms. of opium without licence, the appellant has been convicted under Section 9(c) read with Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as … offices, minimum punishment of imprisonment is 15 years which may extend to 30 years while minimum fine is Rs.1.5 lakhs which may extent to Rs.3

Organon (India) Ltd. (Now Known as Infar (India) Ltd. and Another Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 5 and 7; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 141, 245, 301, 303, 305 and 372; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 34, 59 and 82; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 3A; Dangerous Drugs (Import, Export and Transshipment) Rules, 1957 - Rules 2(2), 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 17; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 292; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3(1); M.P. Poppy Husk Rules, 1959 - Rules 3A, 5, 6 and 8; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Mines & Minerals (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1994SC2489; JT1994(4)SC438; 1994(3)SCALE421; 1995Supp(1)SCC53; [1994]Supp2SCR50

national borders. With a view to control cultivation, possession, transport and sale of opium and its derivatives, the Opium Act, 1857 was enacted. A few years later Opium Act, 1878 was enacted. (In these appeals we are not concerned … ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. In these appeals, validity of Section 5 of the Opium Act, 1878 and of certain Rules made thereunder by the Madhya Pradesh Government is … months from the date of issue of the said Authorisation. On March 30, 1974, the appellant applied to the Collector of Excise, District Mandsaur, Madhya

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Kuldeep Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9A, 25A, 29 and 57; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Constitution of India - Article 136; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD(Cri)324; 2004CriLJ836; JT2003(9)SC584; 2003(10)SCALE496; (2004)2SCC590; 2004(1)LC638(SC)

drugs was earlier exercised through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments were the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 which had become more or less obsolete, and … heroine, and the accused would have got about forty kilograms as admitted by him - Appeal allowed - Section 30: [S.B. Sinha & Cyriac Joseph, JJ] Setting aside of Award Arbitrator taken into consideration ultimate contract and found

Binu Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, New Delhi and O ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

narcotic drugs in India was exercised through various Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted several years ago. These and other … Ernakulam were dismissed by that Court holding inter alia that the buprenorphine seized was of commercial quantity attracting Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Exts. P1 and P2 are the orders dismissing the bail applications. Subsequently the … custody. Applications for bail filed by the petitioner as Crl.M.C. 190 and 306 of 2011 before the Sessions Court Ernakulam were dismissed by that Court

Hardeo Gujar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN75

statutory control over narcotic drugs is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The Opium Act, 1857 and 1878 were amended from time to time, but it was found that the intention of the Legislature … possession of the drug to which he answered in negative, sample weighing 30 gms. was taken out of the substance recovered and was sealed in … by the ASI Bajrang Lal, where upon the FIR Ex. P. 4 was recorded. Accused was charged under Section 8/18 of the Act of 1985. Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. During the trial

Directorate of Revenue Intelligence vs.amit Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

however, India opposed to it.15. India, prior to 1985 exercised the statutory control over narcotic drugs under The Opium Act, 1857 and The Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930.16. The Single Convention unambiguously condemns drug addiction, however, stating that "addiction to … carried out in CRCL Delhi and only Ketamine Hydrochloride was detected in 30 out of the 39 samples and the remaining 9 samples were advised … against the present petitioner, i.e., Directorate of Revenue Intelligence( DRI), who preferred to file the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for setting aside/quashing of the aforesaid impugned order.2. The brief facts