Advanced Search Results

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, … sale of opium, an offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to three years with or without fine. Section 3 of that Act defines opium. It was, therefore, imperative under the old Act to send the samples to

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, … application for pardon filed by person under Section 307 rejected by Court. - INTEREST ACT (14 of 1978) Section 3: [R.V.Raveendran & J.M.Panchal,JJ] Compound interest - Lease-cum-sale agreement - Price payable in instalments - Agreement providing to pay

State of Rajasthan Vs. Sohansingh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ1134; 1976(9)WLN13

thirty-two rupees per bigha of land illegally cultivated.To my mind, the accused had contravened Section 21 of the Opium Act, 1857. Section 9 of this Act has nothing to do with the offence. The poppy plants could only be attached … provide for punishment for growing or cultivating poppy without proper authority. Moreover, the definition of opium given in Section 3 of this latter Act, does not speak of poppy plants. The provisions as respect prohibiting and punishing poppy

Vishal Puri vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

the enactment of the NDPS Act, 1985, the statutory control over narcotic drugs was being exercised under the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. However, the provisions of these enactments were found … on the ground that it has been issued without complying with the mandatory statutory requirements set out under Section 3 of the NDPS Act.5. Before going to the grounds of challenge, the impugned Notification dated 10.02.2011 whereby 'Ketamine'

Balley Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(6); Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 7 and 8

Reported in : AIR1967All341

opium or for seeds. With the enactment to the Opium and RevenueLaws (Extension of Application) Act, 1960, the Opium Act, 1857 was extended to the Pargana of Jaunsar Bawar. Section 8 of the Opium Act provides for the issue … of Jaunsar Bawar as a staple food. It is only used as a subsidiary spicy item. Out of 36 khatas in the whole of Jaunsar Bawar Pargana only 14 khatas cultivated poppy, which shows that it is

Bharat Aambale versus the State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.1524

453 - referred to. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs or Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Bill, 1988; Narcotic Drugs and … India v. Mohan Lal & Anr. [2016] 1 SCR 651 : (2016) 3 SCC 379; Noor Aga v. State of Punjab & Anr. [2008] 10 … [J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Appellant had been convicted by the Courts below under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The issue was whether the conviction could be said

U.O.i. and anr. Vs. Sajeev V. Deshphande

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, three colonial enactments to some extent dealt with the legislative subject matter of the Act. They are Opium Act, 1857, The Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. Subsequently, various international treaties and protocols etc. dealing … learned counsel to two decisions of this Court; namely, a decision of 3-Judge Bench in Collector of Customs, New Delhi vs. Ahmadalieva Nodira (2004) 3 … 2-Judge Bench in State of Uttaranchal vs. Rajesh Kuamr Gupta (2007) 1 SCC355 Reference was also made of Section 80 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 which reads as under:“80. Application of the Drugs

Hakam Singh Vs. Union Territory

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Narcotics

Reported in : 1989(22)ECC315

out certain discrepancies on material particulars in the statements of the prosecution witnesses.5. The Act has repealed the Opium Act (13 of 1857), the Opium Act, 1878 (1 of 1878) and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 (2 of … and First Information Report was recorded on its basis. After completing the various formalities of investigation, report under Section 173, Criminal P.C. (briefly the Code) was presented before the Illaqua Magistrate. Scaled bag of the crushed poppy … P.W.3 and P.W. 4 respectively. The appellant in his statement under Section 313 of the Code took up the plea that he has been falsely

State of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 42, 50, 50(4), 51 and 54; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 51(2), 100, 102, 103 and 165; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR1999SC2378; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)279; 1999CriLJ3672; 1999(65)ECC695; 1999LC545(SC); [1999(81)FLR303]; (1999)3GLR2483; JT1999(4)SC595; (1999)ILLJ254SC; 1999(II)OLR(SC)474; 199

of the States also had enacted certain statutes With a view to deal with illicit in drugs. The Opium Act, 1857 related mainly to preventing illicit cultivation of poppy, regulating cultivation of poppy and manufacture of opium. Opium Act, … was divergence of opinion between different Benches of this Court with regard to the ambit and scope of Section 50 of Narcotic Drugs and - Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter 'NDPS Act') and in particular with regard … Singh : 1994CriLJ3702 , and it answered them as under : (p. 322. para 25) 'On prior information the empowered officer or authorised officer while

Great Legalisation Movement India Trust vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

number of Central and NEGI W.P.(C) 7608/2019 Page 3 of 11state enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … Great LegislationMovement India Trust under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the vires of Sections 8(b), 8(c), first proviso to Section 8, Sections 9, 10, 12, 14, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,