Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: opium act 1857 section 29 · Page 1 of about 24 results (0.034 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 08 2003

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Kuldeep Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-08-2003

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9A, 25A, 29 and 57; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Constitution of India - Article 136; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD(Cri)324; 2004CriLJ836; JT2003(9)SC584; 2003(10)SCALE496; (2004)2SCC590; 2004(1)LC638(SC)

drugs was earlier exercised through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments were the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 which had become more or less obsolete, and … the impugned judgment. The respondent was found guilty of offences punishable under Section 9A/25A and 9A/25A read with Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short the 'Act').3. Factual background which led to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2020

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-29-2020

Subject : Right to Information

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … body often becomes necessary for the investigation of a crime (see page 29). Incriminating information must therefore include statements based on personal knowledge. The Court … on three grounds, as follows: “24.1. The conviction is based solely on the purported confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act which has no evidentiary value inasmuch as: (a) The statement was given to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2025

Bharat Aambale versus the State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-06-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.1524

453 - referred to. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs or Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Bill, 1988; Narcotic Drugs and … [J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Appellant had been convicted by the Courts below under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The issue was whether the conviction could be said … the Act 2 of 1989, which came into force with effect from 29.05.1989. The said provision reads as under: “52A. Disposal of seized narcotic drugs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 20 2024

Narcotics Control Bureau versus Kashif

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-20-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1406

Cited Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, Tenth Edition. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, … State of H.P. v. Pirthi Chand and Another [1995] Supp. 6 SCR 29 : (1996) 2 SCC 37 - relied on. Eastern Coalfields Limited v. … of 2024) 20 December 2024 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes† Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2001

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2001

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, … granted.2. The appellant is under trial for offences alleged to have bene committed under Sections 21 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (referred to hereafter as the 'Act'). The respondent No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1998

Harnek Singh Vs. the State of Punjab [Overruled] Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-25-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 17 and 30; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24

Reported in : 1999CriLJ635

November 14, 1985 vide S.O. No. 821(E), dated 14-11-1985. On coming into force, the Act of 1985, the Opium Act, 1857 (13 of 1857), Opium Act, 1878 (1 of 1878) and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 (2 of 1930) … 161A were incorporated in the proposed legislation with an enhanced punishment, it is not necessary to retain those sections in the Indian Penal Code. Consequently, it was proposed to delete those sections with the necessary saving provision. … while the said officer was inspecting the petitioner's shop at Giddalur on 29-9-1955. The Executive Officer is said to have entered the petitioner's shop and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2011

Binu Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, New Delhi and O ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-09-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

narcotic drugs in India was exercised through various Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted several years ago. These and other … Ernakulam were dismissed by that Court holding inter alia that the buprenorphine seized was of commercial quantity attracting Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Exts. P1 and P2 are the orders dismissing the bail applications. Subsequently the … year 1989 as per Central Act 2 of 1989 with effect from 29-5-1989. Except in the case of small quantity of narcotic drugs and psychotropic

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1988

Hardeo Gujar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-05-1988

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN75

statutory control over narcotic drugs is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The Opium Act, 1857 and 1878 were amended from time to time, but it was found that the intention of the Legislature … before me the case of Ratan Lal v. State 1987 (2) Crimes 29 in which his Lordships of the Delhi High Court held as under:Looking … by the ASI Bajrang Lal, where upon the FIR Ex. P. 4 was recorded. Accused was charged under Section 8/18 of the Act of 1985. Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. During the trial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2000

Narender Kaur Vs. Arun Sheoran, I.O., Narcotics Control Bureau

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-19-2000

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 451 and 482 Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 - Sections 43 and 60

Reported in : 2000(56)DRJ553

the States also had enacted certain statutes with a view to deal with illicit traffic in drugs. The Opium Act, 1857 related mainly to preventing illicit cultivation of poppy, regulating cultivation of poppy and manufacture of opium. Opium Act, … ORDERJ.B. Goel, J.1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code') challenges the legality and propriety of order … and subsequent offences. The NDPS Act 1985 was amended in 988 w.e.f. 29th May, 1989. Minimum punishment of 10 years' imprisonment which may extend up

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1987

Hakam Singh Vs. Union Territory

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-22-1987

Subject : Narcotics

Reported in : 1989(22)ECC315

out certain discrepancies on material particulars in the statements of the prosecution witnesses.5. The Act has repealed the Opium Act (13 of 1857), the Opium Act, 1878 (1 of 1878) and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 (2 of … and First Information Report was recorded on its basis. After completing the various formalities of investigation, report under Section 173, Criminal P.C. (briefly the Code) was presented before the Illaqua Magistrate. Scaled bag of the crushed poppy … side of the Punjab University Campus., Chandigarh, at about 7.30 p.m., on 29-4-1986. He received secret information that the appellant would be passing by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial