Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: opium act 1857 section 28 · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.026 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 20 2024

Narcotics Control Bureau versus Kashif

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-20-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1406

Cited Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, Tenth Edition. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, … of 2024) 20 December 2024 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes† Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 … Ganesh Chaudhary having been apprehended by the team of Appellant -Bureau on 28.02.2022, he made a disclosure statement, on the basis of which a second

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2020

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-29-2020

Subject : Right to Information

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … fact thereby discovered, in consequence of that information received from a person 28 accused of any offence while in custody of the police can be … on three grounds, as follows: “24.1. The conviction is based solely on the purported confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act which has no evidentiary value inasmuch as: (a) The statement was given to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1994

Organon (India) Ltd. (Now Known as Infar (India) Ltd. and Another Vs. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-22-1994

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 5 and 7; Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 141, 245, 301, 303, 305 and 372; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 34, 59 and 82; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 3A; Dangerous Drugs (Import, Export and Transshipment) Rules, 1957 - Rules 2(2), 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 17; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 292; Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 3(1); M.P. Poppy Husk Rules, 1959 - Rules 3A, 5, 6 and 8; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5; Mines & Minerals (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1994SC2489; JT1994(4)SC438; 1994(3)SCALE421; 1995Supp(1)SCC53; [1994]Supp2SCR50

national borders. With a view to control cultivation, possession, transport and sale of opium and its derivatives, the Opium Act, 1857 was enacted. A few years later Opium Act, 1878 was enacted. (In these appeals we are not concerned … ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. In these appeals, validity of Section 5 of the Opium Act, 1878 and of certain Rules made thereunder by the Madhya Pradesh Government is … against which the appellant approached this Court. Leave was granted on January 28, 1977. Interim orders were passed from time to time permitting the appellant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 24 1998

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-24-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2011

Binu Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, New Delhi and O ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-09-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

narcotic drugs in India was exercised through various Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted several years ago. These and other … Ernakulam were dismissed by that Court holding inter alia that the buprenorphine seized was of commercial quantity attracting Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Exts. P1 and P2 are the orders dismissing the bail applications. Subsequently the … attempts to commit offencesSame punishment as is provided for the offence Sec. 2818For abetment and Criminal conspiracy-do- Sec. 2919For preparation to commit an offence by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1988

Hardeo Gujar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-05-1988

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN75

statutory control over narcotic drugs is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The Opium Act, 1857 and 1878 were amended from time to time, but it was found that the intention of the Legislature … by the ASI Bajrang Lal, where upon the FIR Ex. P. 4 was recorded. Accused was charged under Section 8/18 of the Act of 1985. Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. During the trial … is that although the occurrence is said to have taken place on 28-2-1986 at 7 p.m. and the First Information Report was lodged on that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2012

VipIn Nair and Another Vs. Gulam Mohammed Malik and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

was exercised in India though a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act,1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930, were enacted a long time ago. With the passage … NCB office. On inquiry, Accused No.1 disclosed that he had stored another 28 kg. of Hashish in the basement used as business premises by Accused … Sessions Judge found Gulam Mohammad Malik (hereinafter referred to as ‘Accused No.1’) guilty for having committed offence under section 8 (c) punishable under section 20(b) (ii) punishable under section 31- A of the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2022

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2022

Subject : Narcotics

to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … species of ‘papaver’ which may be used for the production of ‘opium’. 2838. It will also be relevant to refer to the following extracts from … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2014

U.O.i. and anr. Vs. Sajeev V. Deshphande

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-12-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, three colonial enactments to some extent dealt with the legislative subject matter of the Act. They are Opium Act, 1857, The Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. Subsequently, various international treaties and protocols etc. dealing … 2-Judge Bench in State of Uttaranchal vs. Rajesh Kuamr Gupta (2007) 1 SCC355 Reference was also made of Section 80 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 which reads as under:“80. Application of the Drugs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 1981

R.K.V. Motors and Timbers (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Regional Transport Off ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-23-1981

Subject : Motor VehiclesOther Taxes

Acts : Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1976 - Sections 5, 5(1) and 28; Kerala Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1975 - Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1982Ker156

may also point out that the facts in Harla's case, AIR 1951 SC 467, were different, the Jaipur Opium Act could not have been said to have been made; there was only a resolution by the Council of … excluded in respect of a period for which the exemption is granted under Section 5.13. The enactment by Section 28 of the Act, confers on the Government, rule-making powers. Such powers take in among other things, the manner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial