Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: opium act 1857 section 27 · Page 1 of about 24 results (0.039 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 29 2020

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-29-2020

Subject : Right to Information

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … which involved comparison of handwriting under section 73 of the Evidence Act, and the third of which involved section 27 of the Evidence Act. After hearing arguments on both sides, the Court first concluded that M.P. Sharma (supra)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1997

Smt. Santosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-20-1997

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9A, 15 to 25 26, 27, 27A, 31A, 32A, 33, 37 and 39; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 32A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 21, 72 and 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 55; Customs Act; Terrorists and Destruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985; Prisons Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389, 432, 433, 433A and 438; Remission Rules; Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972

Reported in : 1998CriLJ612; 1998(1)WLC90; 1997(2)WLN375

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted along time ago. With the passage … consumption of any Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances or consumption of such drug or substance is punishable under Section 27 which provides the maximum imprisonment for a term of one year or with fine. The provisions of Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1996

Ambalal Ranchhodji Thakor Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-15-1996

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1997)1GLR795

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878, and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … petitioner does not fall within the purview of Section 37 of N.D.P.S. Act, as it is covered by Section 27 of the N.D.P.S. Act, as held by his Lordship N. N. Mathur J. in Misc. Criminal Application No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 23 2026

Great Legalisation Movement India Trust vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-23-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

number of Central and NEGI W.P.(C) 7608/2019 Page 3 of 11state enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … the basis of quantities of contraband notified as "small quantity" and "commercial quantity". Further through as per the section 27 of the ND'S Act 1985 punishment for the consumption of narcotic drug has been provided however in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2012

VipIn Nair and Another Vs. Gulam Mohammed Malik and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

was exercised in India though a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act,1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930, were enacted a long time ago. With the passage … Sessions Judge found Gulam Mohammad Malik (hereinafter referred to as ‘Accused No.1’) guilty for having committed offence under section 8 (c) punishable under section 20(b) (ii) punishable under section 31- A of the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances … in the case of Mithu V/s. State of Punjab, (1983) 2 SCC 277, Indian Harm Reduction Network preferred Criminal Writ Petition No.1784 of 2010 challenging

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1998

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-24-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2011

Binu Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, New Delhi and O ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-09-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

narcotic drugs in India was exercised through various Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted several years ago. These and other … those offenders who are accused of offences punishable under Sections 19, 24, 27 A and also for offences involving commercial quantity. The expressions "small quantity" … Ernakulam were dismissed by that Court holding inter alia that the buprenorphine seized was of commercial quantity attracting Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Exts. P1 and P2 are the orders dismissing the bail applications. Subsequently the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2008

Sau. Parwatabai W/O Gokulprasad Yadav [In Jail] Vs. the State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-24-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20, 42(1), 42(2), 50, 52, 52A and 57; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 311

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR3369

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … Joshi, J. 1. The Appellant is accused in Special Criminal Case No. 22 of 1997 for offence under Section 20(b)(ii) A of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act.2. Police Inspector Mr. Pawade ordered to raid the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2000

Narender Kaur Vs. Arun Sheoran, I.O., Narcotics Control Bureau

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-19-2000

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 451 and 482 Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 - Sections 43 and 60

Reported in : 2000(56)DRJ553

the States also had enacted certain statutes with a view to deal with illicit traffic in drugs. The Opium Act, 1857 related mainly to preventing illicit cultivation of poppy, regulating cultivation of poppy and manufacture of opium. Opium Act, … powers of the Court to suspend a sentence passed on persons convicted of offences under the Act (except Section 27) either during pendency of any appeal or otherwise and this provision would have an overriding effect with regard

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2022

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2022

Subject : Narcotics

to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1961 27 Convention”) was resolved. It was further amended by the 1972 Protocol. It … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial