Advanced Search Results

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … and recorded by an officer who is to be treated as “police officer” and is thus, hit by Section 25 of the Evidence Act. (b) No such confessional statement could be recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS

Smt. Santosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9A, 15 to 25 26, 27, 27A, 31A, 32A, 33, 37 and 39; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 32A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 21, 72 and 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 55; Customs Act; Terrorists and Destruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985; Prisons Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389, 432, 433, 433A and 438; Remission Rules; Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972

Reported in : 1998CriLJ612; 1998(1)WLC90; 1997(2)WLN375

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted along time ago. With the passage … 31A on subsequent conviction in respect of offence Under Sections 15 to 25 or Section 27A. The offences are triable by special Courts.12. The object … V.K. Singhal, J. 1. By this writ petition the provisions of Section 32A, of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 have been challenged.2. The petitioner is the wife

Sau. Parwatabai W/O Gokulprasad Yadav [In Jail] Vs. the State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20, 42(1), 42(2), 50, 52, 52A and 57; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 311

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR3369

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … Joshi, J. 1. The Appellant is accused in Special Criminal Case No. 22 of 1997 for offence under Section 20(b)(ii) A of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act.2. Police Inspector Mr. Pawade ordered to raid the

Narender Kaur Vs. Arun Sheoran, I.O., Narcotics Control Bureau

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 451 and 482 Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 - Sections 43 and 60

Reported in : 2000(56)DRJ553

the States also had enacted certain statutes with a view to deal with illicit traffic in drugs. The Opium Act, 1857 related mainly to preventing illicit cultivation of poppy, regulating cultivation of poppy and manufacture of opium. Opium Act, … ORDERJ.B. Goel, J.1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code') challenges the legality and propriety of order … 2. Briefly, the facts are that on prior secret information received on 25.3.1997, the officers of NCB formed two surveillance teams, one was deputed near

Great Legalisation Movement India Trust vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

number of Central and NEGI W.P.(C) 7608/2019 Page 3 of 11state enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … Great LegislationMovement India Trust under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the vires of Sections 8(b), 8(c), first proviso to Section 8, Sections 9, 10, 12, 14, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,

Harnek Singh Vs. the State of Punjab [Overruled] Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 17 and 30; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24

Reported in : 1999CriLJ635

November 14, 1985 vide S.O. No. 821(E), dated 14-11-1985. On coming into force, the Act of 1985, the Opium Act, 1857 (13 of 1857), Opium Act, 1878 (1 of 1878) and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 (2 of 1930) … and Kashmir' were omitted by Prevention of Food Adulteration (Amendment) Act (41 of 1971), S. 2 (w.e.f. 26-1-1972). Section 25 of the Act of 1954 deals with Repeal and Saving. Under sub-sec. (1) of S. 25, if there

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, … of the Laboratory, inter alia, are :(i) Testing of samples sent by the above departments under relevant Acts/Rules.... 25. This notification was preceded by another notification issued on 14th April, 1982 by the Government of Himachal Pradesh

Narcotics Control Bureau versus Kashif

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1406

Cited Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, Tenth Edition. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, … erroneous and deserves to be quashed and set aside. [Paras 11, 23, 25, 40] Case Law Cited Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (Investigation) New … of 2024) 20 December 2024 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes† Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Kuldeep Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9A, 25A, 29 and 57; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Constitution of India - Article 136; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD(Cri)324; 2004CriLJ836; JT2003(9)SC584; 2003(10)SCALE496; (2004)2SCC590; 2004(1)LC638(SC)

drugs was earlier exercised through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments were the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 which had become more or less obsolete, and … by the Rajasthan High Court in the impugned judgment. The respondent was found guilty of offences punishable under Section 9A/25A and 9A/25A read with Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short … challan was filed against the accused under Section 9A read with Section 25A and Section 29 of the Act. The charges under Sections 9A/25A and

Binu Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, New Delhi and O ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

narcotic drugs in India was exercised through various Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted several years ago. These and other … were allegedly found in the vicinity of the said house each carrying 25 ampules of diazepam for sale were also arrested. Each of the three … Ernakulam were dismissed by that Court holding inter alia that the buprenorphine seized was of commercial quantity attracting Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Exts. P1 and P2 are the orders dismissing the bail applications. Subsequently the