Advanced Search Results
Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-16-2001
NarcoticsCriminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860
AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(
Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh
Himachal Pradesh
Feb-24-1998
Criminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54
1998CriLJ1829
commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, … deals with procedure for sending opium delivered by a cultivator and suspected to be adulterated. As per Rule 22 if it is found to be adulterated on examination by the Chemical Examiner in the Government Opium Factory,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo
Supreme Court of India
Oct-20-2022
Narcotics
to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … fine which may extend to then thousand rupees or with both; or 22 (b) where the contravention involves quantity lesser than commercial quantity but greater … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
AmIn Shariff Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Feb-21-1934
Criminal
AIR1934Cal580,150Ind.Cas.561
the Opium Act (13 of 1857) there are also similar provisions, e.g., see Sections 22, 23 and 24. Section 22 enjoined land-holders and others to give information of illegal cultivation of poppy to the Police or Abkari Darogas … No. 379), both of whom have been convicted by the Chief Presidency Magistrate of Calcutta under Section 9, Opium Act (l of 1878). These two men are said to have made confessions to the Excise Inspector. At the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarcotics Control Bureau versus Kashif
Supreme Court of India
Dec-20-2024
Land Acquisition
[2024]12S.C.R.1406
Cited Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, Tenth Edition. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, … of 2024) 20 December 2024 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes† Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 … Kashif and six other accused, for the offences punishable under Section 8, 22(c), 23(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. 4. The Respondent - Accused
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGreat Legalisation Movement India Trust vs Union of India and Ors.
Delhi
Jan-23-2026
Land Acquisition
number of Central and NEGI W.P.(C) 7608/2019 Page 3 of 11state enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … Great LegislationMovement India Trust under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the vires of Sections 8(b), 8(c), first proviso to Section 8, Sections 9, 10, 12, 14, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirectorate of Revenue Intelligence vs.amit Kumar
Delhi
Nov-22-2016
Land Acquisition
however, India opposed to it.15. India, prior to 1985 exercised the statutory control over narcotic drugs under The Opium Act, 1857 and The Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930.16. The Single Convention unambiguously condemns drug addiction, however, stating that "addiction to … against the present petitioner, i.e., Directorate of Revenue Intelligence( DRI), who preferred to file the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for setting aside/quashing of the aforesaid impugned order.2. The brief facts
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India
Oct-29-2020
Right to Information
is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … grammatical sense means giving oral testimony in court. Case law has gone 22 beyond this strict literal interpretation of the expression which may now bear … on three grounds, as follows: “24.1. The conviction is based solely on the purported confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act which has no evidentiary value inasmuch as: (a) The statement was given to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarnek Singh Vs. the State of Punjab [Overruled] Overruled
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-25-1998
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 17 and 30; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24
1999CriLJ635
November 14, 1985 vide S.O. No. 821(E), dated 14-11-1985. On coming into force, the Act of 1985, the Opium Act, 1857 (13 of 1857), Opium Act, 1878 (1 of 1878) and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 (2 of 1930) … FIR No. 47 dated 8-4-1991, Police Station Sarabha Nagar, Ludhiana, FIR No. 22 dated 1-4-1992, Police Station Longowal and FIR No. 109 dated 28-7-1991, Police … 161A were incorporated in the proposed legislation with an enhanced punishment, it is not necessary to retain those sections in the Indian Penal Code. Consequently, it was proposed to delete those sections with the necessary saving provision.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Santosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Rajasthan
Aug-20-1997
CriminalConstitution
Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9A, 15 to 25 26, 27, 27A, 31A, 32A, 33, 37 and 39; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 32A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 21, 72 and 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 55; Customs Act; Terrorists and Destruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985; Prisons Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389, 432, 433, 433A and 438; Remission Rules; Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972
1998CriLJ612; 1998(1)WLC90; 1997(2)WLN375
is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted along time ago. With the passage … Substances Act, 1985 have been challenged.2. The petitioner is the wife of Satya Narain who was convicted under Section 22 of the Act for 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment and a fine of Rs. one lac for the offence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »