Advanced Search Results

Sau. Parwatabai W/O Gokulprasad Yadav [In Jail] Vs. the State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20, 42(1), 42(2), 50, 52, 52A and 57; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 311

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR3369

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … Joshi, J. 1. The Appellant is accused in Special Criminal Case No. 22 of 1997 for offence under Section 20(b)(ii) A of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act.2. Police Inspector Mr. Pawade ordered to raid the house

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, … assuming that it has some force, does not survive the order passed by this Court on 3rd November 2000 granting permission to the appellant to file the special leave petition.12. The appellant's arguments on the merits were

Smt. Umrawati Devi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 37, 81, 82 and 82(1); Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT77(CG)

of NDPS Act, 1985, different laws were covering different fields relating to Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. The Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878, the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 and the M.P. Excise Act, 1915 were dealing with … Heard .1. Diary of Crime No. 1046/2000 of Police Station Chhaoni Distt. Durg, for the offence punishable under Section 20B of NDPS Act, perused.2. Learned counsel for the applicant without making any reference to the merits of … of Police Station Chhaoni Distt. Durg, for the offence punishable under Section 20B of NDPS Act, perused.2. Learned counsel for the applicant without making any

Bharat Aambale versus the State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.1524

453 - referred to. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs or Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Bill, 1988; Narcotic Drugs and … [J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Appellant had been convicted by the Courts below under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The issue was whether the conviction could be said

VipIn Nair and Another Vs. Gulam Mohammed Malik and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

was exercised in India though a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act,1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930, were enacted a long time ago. With the passage … Malik (hereinafter referred to as ‘Accused No.1’) guilty for having committed offence under section 8 (c) punishable under section 20(b) (ii) punishable under section 31- A of the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short the ‘Act’)

Gurdev Singh Vs. The State Of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

control over narcotic drugs was exercised in India through number of Central and State enactments viz. - The Opium Act, 1857, (b) the Opium Act, 1878 and (c) The Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. However, with the passage of time … conviction and sentence passed by the Learned Special Court 2 convicting the accused for the offence punishable under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the Act”) … High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CRA-DB No.311 of 2018 by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … purpose of having the police. Sections 23 and 25 lay down the duties of the police officers and Section 20 deals with the authority they can exercise. They can exercise such authority as is provided for a police

Bahabal Shah Vs. Tarak Nath Chowdhry

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1897)ILR24Cal691

before Mr. Justice Rampini, and which has been raised before us. Mr. Justice Rampini considered that under the Opium Act (I of 1878) the police officer had no authority to make the search he did.8. That was practically … having power to arrest without warrant by virtue of the provisions of Section 24 of Act XIII of 1857; and that, being a cognizable case, the police officer was authorized to investigate the case without the order

Harnek Singh Vs. the State of Punjab [Overruled] Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 17 and 30; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24

Reported in : 1999CriLJ635

November 14, 1985 vide S.O. No. 821(E), dated 14-11-1985. On coming into force, the Act of 1985, the Opium Act, 1857 (13 of 1857), Opium Act, 1878 (1 of 1878) and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 (2 of 1930) … 161A were incorporated in the proposed legislation with an enhanced punishment, it is not necessary to retain those sections in the Indian Penal Code. Consequently, it was proposed to delete those sections with the necessary saving provision. … the 7th October, 1955 and published in the Calcutta Gazette, dated the 20th October, 1955, is not repealed by S. 16(1)(b) of the Essential Act,