Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: opium act 1857 section 17 · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.027 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 24 1998

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-24-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, … as the Chemical Examiner, Government Opium and Alkaloid Works, Neemuch or as the case may be, Gazipur. Rule 17 occurring in Chapter-Ill of the Rules deals with procedure for sending opium delivered by a cultivator and suspected

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1996

Ambalal Ranchhodji Thakor Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-15-1996

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1997)1GLR795

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878, and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … H.M. Mehta with Mr. S.C. Patel were heard, as by amendment, the petitioner has challenged the vires of Sections 27, 37 and 52 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ('N.D.P.S. Act' for short).3. With the … 1992(2) Crimes 1022 (All.);(7) Dadan Singh v. State of U.P. 1993 Crimes 1785 (All.);(8) Mari Appa v. State of M.P. 1990 Cri. LJ. 1990 (M.P.);

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2022

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2022

Subject : Narcotics

to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … depending upon the quantity of ‘poppy straw’. He submitted that, similarly, Sections 17 and 18 of the 1985 Act deal with punishment for contravention in … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 25 1998

Harnek Singh Vs. the State of Punjab [Overruled] Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-25-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 17 and 30; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24

Reported in : 1999CriLJ635

November 14, 1985 vide S.O. No. 821(E), dated 14-11-1985. On coming into force, the Act of 1985, the Opium Act, 1857 (13 of 1857), Opium Act, 1878 (1 of 1878) and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 (2 of 1930) … in this case cannot claim to be released under proviso (a) to S. 167(2) of the New Code.' Section 17 of the Corruption Act, 1988 reads as under :- 17. Persons authorised to investigate - Notwithstanding anything contained

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2001

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2001

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, … principle is to prevent the escape of the offenders from punishment in heinous offences fort lack of evidence.' 17. The provisions of Sections 337 and 338 of the 1898 Cr.P.C. have been substantially re-enacted as Sections 306

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2008

Sau. Parwatabai W/O Gokulprasad Yadav [In Jail] Vs. the State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-24-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20, 42(1), 42(2), 50, 52, 52A and 57; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 311

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR3369

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … Joshi, J. 1. The Appellant is accused in Special Criminal Case No. 22 of 1997 for offence under Section 20(b)(ii) A of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act.2. Police Inspector Mr. Pawade ordered to raid the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2011

Binu Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, New Delhi and O ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-09-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

narcotic drugs in India was exercised through various Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted several years ago. These and other … opium i.e. opium adapted for medical use as per Indian pharmacopoeia in powder, granulated, mixed or other forms (Section 17) ........................................................................... 2) Prepared opium i.e. extract suitable for smoking and the dross of other residue after opinion is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2017

Vishal Puri vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-2017

Subject : Education

the enactment of the NDPS Act, 1985, the statutory control over narcotic drugs was being exercised under the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. However, the provisions of these enactments were found … writ petition reads as under: W.P.(C) No.11416 of 2015 Page 1 of 17 3. "(a) Declare that the Notification S.O. 311, dated 10th February 2011 … the... Petitioner." It is pleaded that in relation to the seizure of 1195.2kg of 'Ketamine Hydrochloride', summons under Section 67 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act') were issued to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 14 1994

Radha Ballava SwaIn Vs. State

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-14-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 82; Opium Act

Reported in : 1994(II)OLR459

the question regarding the validity of the action taken by the Magistrate, this Court held ;'So far as Opium Act, 1857 and 1878 are concerned, they have been repealed after coming into force of the Act with effect from … said to have been seized from the possession of the petitioner and he was prosecuted and convicted Under Sections 9(a) of the Opium Act though in fact the provisions of the Opiurn Act stood repealed after coming … by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in this case on 17.11-1885 soma quantity of opium was said to have been seized from the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1988

Hardeo Gujar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-05-1988

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN75

statutory control over narcotic drugs is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The Opium Act, 1857 and 1878 were amended from time to time, but it was found that the intention of the Legislature … by the ASI Bajrang Lal, where upon the FIR Ex. P. 4 was recorded. Accused was charged under Section 8/18 of the Act of 1985. Accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. During the trial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial