Advanced Search Results

Binu Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, New Delhi and O ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

narcotic drugs in India was exercised through various Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted several years ago. These and other … Ernakulam were dismissed by that Court holding inter alia that the buprenorphine seized was of commercial quantity attracting Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Exts. P1 and P2 are the orders dismissing the bail applications. Subsequently the … KLT 122 (SC) and Hussain v. State of Kerala (2000) 8 SCC 139 and entry No. 239 of the Notification dated 19-10-2001 were relied on

Balley Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(6); Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 7 and 8

Reported in : AIR1967All341

opium or for seeds. With the enactment to the Opium and RevenueLaws (Extension of Application) Act, 1960, the Opium Act, 1857 was extended to the Pargana of Jaunsar Bawar. Section 8 of the Opium Act provides for the issue … two companion petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenge the constitutional vires of the Opium Act (Act XIII of 1857) whereunder the respondents have completely banned the cultivation of poppy in pargana Jaunsar Bawar in the

Smt. Umrawati Devi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 37, 81, 82 and 82(1); Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT77(CG)

of NDPS Act, 1985, different laws were covering different fields relating to Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. The Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878, the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 and the M.P. Excise Act, 1915 were dealing with … Heard .1. Diary of Crime No. 1046/2000 of Police Station Chhaoni Distt. Durg, for the offence punishable under Section 20B of NDPS Act, perused.2. Learned counsel for the applicant without making any reference to the merits of

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, … land cultivated with opium poppy and the preliminary weighment of the produce is governed by Rules 12 and 13, respectively. All opium produced by the authorised cultivator shall be delivered to the District Opium Officer by Rule

Harnek Singh Vs. the State of Punjab [Overruled] Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 17 and 30; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24

Reported in : 1999CriLJ635

November 14, 1985 vide S.O. No. 821(E), dated 14-11-1985. On coming into force, the Act of 1985, the Opium Act, 1857 (13 of 1857), Opium Act, 1878 (1 of 1878) and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 (2 of 1930) … 161A were incorporated in the proposed legislation with an enhanced punishment, it is not necessary to retain those sections in the Indian Penal Code. Consequently, it was proposed to delete those sections with the necessary saving provision.

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, … 1 on two separate complaints of the Narcotics Control Bureau (briefly referred to as 'NCB') being SC No. 136/89 and SC No. 233/88. The appellant is the principal accused in both cases. The allegation is that he

State of Orissa Vs. Hari Behera and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 395; Constitution of India - Article 228; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 82(1); Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 3 and 9

Reported in : 1993(II)OLR591

case does not satisfy the ratio of Badku Joti Svant and subsequent decisions referred to earlier.'So far as Opium Act, 1857 and 1878 are concerned, they have been repealed after coming into force of the Act with effect from … A. Pasayat, J.1. This is a reference by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puri (in short, 'CJM' Under Section 395 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1973 (in short, 'Cr PC).2. The background in which reference has … a police officer, is entitled to exercise all the powers under Chapter XIII of the Code, including the power to submit a report or charge-

Great Legalisation Movement India Trust vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

number of Central and NEGI W.P.(C) 7608/2019 Page 3 of 11state enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … 27-31a, 37, 38, 40, 44, 46, 47, 48, 54, 60, and Entry 13 of the Schedule of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 … Great LegislationMovement India Trust under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the vires of Sections 8(b), 8(c), first proviso to Section 8, Sections 9, 10, 12, 14, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Narcotics

to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Kuldeep Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9A, 25A, 29 and 57; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Constitution of India - Article 136; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD(Cri)324; 2004CriLJ836; JT2003(9)SC584; 2003(10)SCALE496; (2004)2SCC590; 2004(1)LC638(SC)

drugs was earlier exercised through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments were the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 which had become more or less obsolete, and … by the Rajasthan High Court in the impugned judgment. The respondent was found guilty of offences punishable under Section 9A/25A and 9A/25A read with Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short … execute the proceedings. In compliance thereof he reached on the site on 13.12.95 at about 6.30 hours, called independent witnesses Tiku Ram and Sakata Ram