Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: opium act 1857 section 11 · Page 1 of about 40 results (0.043 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 16 2001

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2001

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, … word 'immunity' in the context of Section 64 is - 'Freedom or exemption from penalty, burden, or duty.' 11 Prosecution has been defined as - 'A criminal action; a proceeding instituted and carried on by due course

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1998

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-24-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving, … State assailing the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan in Session Trial No. 11 -N/7 of 1990 dated 23-4-1991 acquitting the respondent-accused for the offence under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 1936

In Re: Jafferbhai Hasam

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-09-1936

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1937Bom10; (1936)38BOMLR961; 166Ind.Cas.562

the Legislature within its intention.5. Our attention has been drawn to the provisions relating to confiscation under the Opium Act (I of 1878), and the authorities under Section 11 which insist upon the giving of notice to the … carriage of tobacco-Notice to owner of car.;The provisions of Section 18 of the Tobacco Duty (Town of Bombay) Act, 1857, leave it to the Court's discretion to confiscate the vehicle; but that discretion has to be judicially exercised.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 20 2024

Narcotics Control Bureau versus Kashif

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-20-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1406

Cited Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, Tenth Edition. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, … is highly erroneous and deserves to be quashed and set aside. [Paras 11, 23, 25, 40] Case Law Cited Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection … of 2024) 20 December 2024 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes† Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2026

Great Legalisation Movement India Trust vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-23-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

number of Central and NEGI W.P.(C) 7608/2019 Page 3 of 11state enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … as violative of Article 14, 19,21, 25,29NEGI W.P.(C) 7608/2019 Page 1 of 11 of the Constitution of India.3. A brief background of the present case … Great LegislationMovement India Trust under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the vires of Sections 8(b), 8(c), first proviso to Section 8, Sections 9, 10, 12, 14, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2022

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2022

Subject : Narcotics

to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … to argue that a test which will prove that the contraband material 11 belongs to the species of ‘papaver somniferum L’ is not necessary; (ii) … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2002

Beckodan Abdul Rahiman Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-16-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9, 18, 31, 36, 41, 42, 42(2), 43 and 50; Opium Act, 1857; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1988

Reported in : AIR2002SC1810; 2002(1)ALD(Cri)952; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)356; (SCSuppl)2002(4)CHN47; 2002CriLJ2529; 2002(2)Crimes375(SC); 2002(81)ECC8; JT2002(4)SC68; 2002(2)KLT211(SC); RLW2002(4

the States also had enacted certain statutes with a view to deal with illicit traffic in drugs. The Opium act, 1857 related mainly to preventing illicit cultivation of poppy, regulating cultivation of poppy and manufacture of opium. The Opium … Sethi, J. 1. For allegedly possessing 11 gms. of opium without licence, the appellant has been convicted under Section 9(c) read with Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1990

Md. JainulabdIn Alias Nahamacha and Etc. Vs. State of Manipur and Etc.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-20-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21, 37, 41, 41(2), 42, 42(1), 43, 50, 53, 70 and 74; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 42; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Assam Opium Prohibition Act; Constitution of India - Article 148(5)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic substances. As the legislature was of the view that the existing law such as Opium Acts of 1857 and 1878 and Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 and some of the local laws like Assam … on getting reliable information. The party included also constable P.W. 1 and P.W. 2, an Official of Narcotic Section of Manipur Police Department and on way they came accross with the accused Jainulabdin @ Nahamacha in a … and Sirajuddin were found moving in suspicious manner at 1 p.m. and 11-10 a.m. respectively and they were arrested by the same Sub-Inspector and after

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1998

Harnek Singh Vs. the State of Punjab [Overruled] Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-25-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 17 and 30; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6 and 24

Reported in : 1999CriLJ635

November 14, 1985 vide S.O. No. 821(E), dated 14-11-1985. On coming into force, the Act of 1985, the Opium Act, 1857 (13 of 1857), Opium Act, 1878 (1 of 1878) and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 (2 of 1930) … 161A were incorporated in the proposed legislation with an enhanced punishment, it is not necessary to retain those sections in the Indian Penal Code. Consequently, it was proposed to delete those sections with the necessary saving provision.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1999

State of Orissa Vs. Hari Behera and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-15-1999

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 82(1); Orissa Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1989 - Sections 74 and 82(2) - Rule 107(2); General Clauses Act - Sections 24; Opium Act - Sections 9 and 47; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act

Reported in : 1999(II)OLR236

be adopted after such a long lapse of time.5. Section 82(1) of the N.D.P.S. Act has repealed the Opium Act. 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. Along with the enactment of the Legislature, necessary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial