Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: opium act 1857 section 10 · Page 1 of about 40 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 23 2026

Great Legalisation Movement India Trust vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-23-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

number of Central and NEGI W.P.(C) 7608/2019 Page 3 of 11state enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … about cannabis legalization.8. That the subject to the provision of Section 8, theState Governments have been empowered under section 10(iii) of the Act to permit and regulate the cultivation of any cannabis plant, production manufacture, possession, transport, import

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2001

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2001

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, … held to have no fixed connotation and they are susceptible of both a wider and a narrower meaning. 10 31. Nevertheless even adopting the method of interpretation suggested by the appellant, we arrive at the same result.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2024

Narcotics Control Bureau versus Kashif

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-20-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2024]12S.C.R.1406

Cited Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, Tenth Edition. List of Acts Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Seizure, Storage, Sampling and Disposal) Rules, … of 2024) 20 December 2024 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.] Issue for Consideration Interpretation of Section 52A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Headnotes† Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 … [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1406 : 2024 INSC 1045 Narcotics Control Bureau v. Kashif (Criminal Appeal No. 5544 of 2024) 20

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 04 1993

State of Orissa Vs. Hari Behera and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-04-1993

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 395; Constitution of India - Article 228; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 82(1); Opium Act, 1878 - Sections 3 and 9

Reported in : 1993(II)OLR591

case does not satisfy the ratio of Badku Joti Svant and subsequent decisions referred to earlier.'So far as Opium Act, 1857 and 1878 are concerned, they have been repealed after coming into force of the Act with effect from … A. Pasayat, J.1. This is a reference by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Puri (in short, 'CJM' Under Section 395 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 1973 (in short, 'Cr PC).2. The background in which reference has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1997

Smt. Santosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-20-1997

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9A, 15 to 25 26, 27, 27A, 31A, 32A, 33, 37 and 39; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 32A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 21, 72 and 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 55; Customs Act; Terrorists and Destruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985; Prisons Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389, 432, 433, 433A and 438; Remission Rules; Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972

Reported in : 1998CriLJ612; 1998(1)WLC90; 1997(2)WLN375

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted along time ago. With the passage … Satya Narain who was convicted under Section 22 of the Act for 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment and a fine of Rs. one lac for the … V.K. Singhal, J. 1. By this writ petition the provisions of Section 32A, of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 have been challenged.2. The petitioner is the wife

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2011

Binu Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, New Delhi and O ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-09-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

narcotic drugs in India was exercised through various Central and State enactments. The principal Central enactments, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted several years ago. These and other … Ernakulam were dismissed by that Court holding inter alia that the buprenorphine seized was of commercial quantity attracting Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Exts. P1 and P2 are the orders dismissing the bail applications. Subsequently the … from 18-11-2009 as "Note - 4" to the notification published as S.O. 1055 (E) dated 19-10-2001. The said Note 4 reads as follows:- "4. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2012

VipIn Nair and Another Vs. Gulam Mohammed Malik and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

was exercised in India though a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act,1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930, were enacted a long time ago. With the passage … much amount was received as well as the amount which remained outstanding. 10. Simultaneously, statement of Accused No.2 was recorded under section 67 of the … Sessions Judge found Gulam Mohammad Malik (hereinafter referred to as ‘Accused No.1’) guilty for having committed offence under section 8 (c) punishable under section 20(b) (ii) punishable under section 31- A of the Narcotics and Psychotropic Substances

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2022

The State Of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Nirmal Kaur @ Nimmo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2022

Subject : Narcotics

to the present enactment, i.e., the 1985 Act coming into force.20. The first of such enactments was the Opium Act, 1857 (for short, “1857 Act”), which was enacted for preventing illicit cultivation of ‘poppy’ and for regulating the cultivation … contents of ‘poppy husk’. After completion of the investigation, the respondent was charged with the offence punishable under Section 15(c) of the 1985 Act for possessing commercial quantity of ‘poppy straw’. The respondent pleaded not guilty and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2020

Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-29-2020

Subject : Right to Information

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … on three grounds, as follows: “24.1. The conviction is based solely on the purported confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act which has no evidentiary value inasmuch as: (a) The statement was given to … cannot be interpreted in the manner in which the provisions of Section 108 of the Customs Act or Section 14 of the Excise Act had

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1998

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-24-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial