Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: opium act 1857 section 1 · Page 1 of about 47 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 26 1966

Balley Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-26-1966

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 19(6); Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 7 and 8

Reported in : AIR1967All341

opium or for seeds. With the enactment to the Opium and RevenueLaws (Extension of Application) Act, 1960, the Opium Act, 1857 was extended to the Pargana of Jaunsar Bawar. Section 8 of the Opium Act provides for the issue … petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenge the constitutional vires of the Opium Act (Act XIII of 1857) whereunder the respondents have completely banned the cultivation of poppy in pargana Jaunsar Bawar in the district of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2001

Jasbir Singh Vs. VipIn Kumar Jaggi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-2001

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1) and (3), 21, 23, 29, 64 and 64 (1), (2) and (3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 306, 307, 311, 321 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20 (2), 215 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 337 and 338; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 291; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

Reported in : AIR2001SC2734; 2001ALLMR(Cri)1949(SC); 2001(2)ALT(Cri)310; 2001CriLJ3993; 2001(4)Crimes127(SC); 93(2001)DLT44(SC); 2001(132)ELT529(SC); JT2001(6)SC419; RLW2002(1)SC5; 2001(

Section 64 of the Act.22. The Act consolidated and amended earlier laws relating to narcotic drugs, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. In the Act's Statement of Objects and Reasons, … to have bene committed under Sections 21 23 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (referred to hereafter as the 'Act'). The respondent No. 1. was a co-accused. The appellant has challenged an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1998

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-24-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 2, 5 to 30, 41, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52(1), 57, 74, 76, 76(2), 82, 82(1) and 293; ;Opium Act, 1857 - Sections 3 and 82(1); ;Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Criminal Attempts Act, 1981 - Section 1(1); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 293; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 489A; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1985 - Rules 2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 24, 24(2), 31, 33, 36, 36(2) and 54

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

commencement. 28. The Act came into force on 16th September, 1985. By Sub-section (1) of Section 82, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 are repealed. Sub-section (2) which provides for saving,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 03 2001

Smt. Umrawati Devi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Feb-03-2001

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 37, 81, 82 and 82(1); Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT77(CG)

of NDPS Act, 1985, different laws were covering different fields relating to Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. The Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878, the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 and the M.P. Excise Act, 1915 were dealing with … Heard .1. Diary of Crime No. 1046/2000 of Police Station Chhaoni Distt. Durg, for the offence punishable under Section 20B of NDPS Act, perused.2. Learned counsel for the applicant without making any reference to the merits of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2008

Sau. Parwatabai W/O Gokulprasad Yadav [In Jail] Vs. the State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-24-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20, 42(1), 42(2), 50, 52, 52A and 57; Opium Act, 1857; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 311

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR3369

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely, the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted a long time ago. With the … Joshi, J. 1. The Appellant is accused in Special Criminal Case No. 22 of 1997 for offence under Section 20(b)(ii) A of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act.2. Police Inspector Mr. Pawade ordered to raid the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1990

Md. JainulabdIn Alias Nahamacha and Etc. Vs. State of Manipur and Etc.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-20-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21, 37, 41, 41(2), 42, 42(1), 43, 50, 53, 70 and 74; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 42; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Assam Opium Prohibition Act; Constitution of India - Article 148(5)

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic substances. As the legislature was of the view that the existing law such as Opium Acts of 1857 and 1878 and Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 and some of the local laws like Assam … on getting reliable information. The party included also constable P.W. 1 and P.W. 2, an Official of Narcotic Section of Manipur Police Department and on way they came accross with the accused Jainulabdin @ Nahamacha in a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1997

Smt. Santosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-20-1997

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 9A, 15 to 25 26, 27, 27A, 31A, 32A, 33, 37 and 39; Opium Act, 1857; Opium (Amendment) Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 32A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 21, 72 and 161; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 55; Customs Act; Terrorists and Destruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985; Prisons Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389, 432, 433, 433A and 438; Remission Rules; Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972

Reported in : 1998CriLJ612; 1998(1)WLC90; 1997(2)WLN375

is exercised in India through a number of Central and State enactments. The principal Central Acts, namely the Opium Act, 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930 were enacted along time ago. With the passage … V.K. Singhal, J. 1. By this writ petition the provisions of Section 32A, of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 have been challenged.2. The petitioner is the wife

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2014

U.O.i. and anr. Vs. Sajeev V. Deshphande

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-12-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, three colonial enactments to some extent dealt with the legislative subject matter of the Act. They are Opium Act, 1857, The Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. Subsequently, various international treaties and protocols etc. dealing … 2-Judge Bench in State of Uttaranchal vs. Rajesh Kuamr Gupta (2007) 1 SCC355 Reference was also made of Section 80 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 which reads as under:“80. Application of the Drugs

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 1976

State of Rajasthan Vs. Sohansingh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-14-1976

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ1134; 1976(9)WLN13

thirty-two rupees per bigha of land illegally cultivated.To my mind, the accused had contravened Section 21 of the Opium Act, 1857. Section 9 of this Act has nothing to do with the offence. The poppy plants could only be attached … has arisen in the following manner.2. Excise Inspector, Phalodi, namely, Khanusingh P.W. 4 and Excise Inspector Banwarilal P.W. 1 checked the field of Sohansingh respondent in village Chhoti Sewahi, Tehsil Osian on April 4, 1970, and found

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1999

State of Orissa Vs. Hari Behera and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-15-1999

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 82(1); Orissa Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules, 1989 - Sections 74 and 82(2) - Rule 107(2); General Clauses Act - Sections 24; Opium Act - Sections 9 and 47; Bihar and Orissa Excise Act

Reported in : 1999(II)OLR236

be adopted after such a long lapse of time.5. Section 82(1) of the N.D.P.S. Act has repealed the Opium Act. 1857, the Opium Act, 1878 and the Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930. Along with the enactment of the Legislature, necessary

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial