Advanced Search Results

Bir Singh Vs. Bachan Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 114; Oaths Act, 1873 - Sections 8 to 12; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 9 to 12; Evidence Act - Sections 20

Reported in : (2005)139PLR616

of oath was erroneous in law as after the repeal of the Indian Oath Act, 1873 by the Oaths Act, 1969, the suit could not have been decided in the afore-mentioned manner as Section 8 to 12 of the

Krishnamoorthy Vs. Sivakumar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act - Sections 8(3), 33, 33A, 33B, 36, 36(2), 100, 100(1), 123(2), 125A and 260(2); Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 - Sections 251 and 259(1); Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 4A; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(3) and 3(37); Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 8; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 14 and 16; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 406, 408 and 477A; Representation of the People (Third Amendment) Act, 2002; Conduct of Elections (Amendment) Rules, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 32, 141, 142, 227, 243K, 243ZA, 324 and 324(1)

Reported in : (2009)5MLJ1255

information and/or gave false information cannot claim a right to continue in service. 50. Section 8 of The Oaths Act, 1969, makes it obligatory for a person swearing to an affidavit, to state the truth. It reads as follows:8.

Saranya Vs. State by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station Per ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

Offences Act, 2012 Section 4 Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 Sections 9, 10 and 11 Section 349 Oaths Act, 1969 Section 8 Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 offence of Rape Sexual Offences Petition was filed against Respondents-Accused Persons under Sections

Shri Puhap Singh Alias Shambhu (Dead) Through L.Rs. Smt. Rambai and Ot ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Oaths Act, 1873 - Sections 9 to 12; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 9; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 20 and 112

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT31; 2002(3)MPLJ136

1873 which contained the provisions relating to special oath in Sections 9 to 12 was repealed by the Oaths Act, 1969 and there was no provision regarding the special oath in the new Act and therefore, the Trial Court … Khare, J. 1. This is a second appeal by defendant No. 2 Puhap Singh alias Shambhu Prasad under Section 100, CPC. The following substantial question of law was formulated by this Court by order dated 26-8-1989 at

V.R. Kamath Vs. Divisional Controller, Karnataka State Road Transport ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : High Court of Karnataka Rules, 1959 - Rule 2; Karnataka Civil Rules of Practice, 1967 - Rule 28-A; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 139 - Order 19, Rule 1 - Order 37A, Rule 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 297; Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 8, Rule 11(2); Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 - Rules 3, 5 and 21; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1997Kant275; ILR1997KAR1856

to the persons concerned, is an indication of the sad state of affairs.5. Section 3(1) of the Oath Act, 1969, empowers Courts and persons having by law or consent of parties, authority 'to receive evidence, to administer oaths … imposed or in exercise of the powers conferred upon them by law. Sub-section (2) of Sec. 3 of Oaths Act provides that the High Court may empower any person to administer oaths and affirmation in respect of affidavits … Court the Chief Ministerial Officer of any Civil Court; and any Notary appointed under the Notaries Act, 1952.5.5 Section 8(e) of the Notaries Act, 1952 empowers a Notary to administer oath to, or take affidavit from any person.

Mahendra Singh Gehlot Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)357

of the affidavit is of no material significance in view of the provisions of Section 7 of the Oaths Act, 1969, which read as follows:7. Proceedings and evidence not invalidated by omission of oath or irregularity No omission to … Years' Diploma Course & was called for interview at the Polytechnic College, Jodhpur, on August 14, 1978, at 8a.m. along with the original testimonials and the prescribed fees. It is alleged in the writ-petition that the interviews

Sand Plast (India) Ltd. Vs. I.T.C. Bhadrachalam Finance and Investment ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Company

Acts : Company (court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 2(13), 6, 13, 18, 21, 24, 26, 30, 33, 35, 40, 44, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 54 and 76; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(3), 433, 434, 439, 477, 478, 503, 539, 543, 545, 550, 552, 555, 621, 625, 633 and 643; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 7; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Power of Attorney Act, 1882; Oaths (Amendment) Act, 1873 - Sections 13; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81 and 83; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 139; Notaries Act, 1952; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 46

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas471(Raj); 2001(1)WLC469; 2003(1)WLN594

the rules made thereunder and in particular Rules 6, 18, 21 and 33 and certain provisions of the Oaths Act, 1969, General Clauses Act etc. He also relied on the following judgments reported in:i) Mool Chand Wahi vs. National … (JTC Bhadrachalam Finance & Investment Ltd. Mumbai. Company Petition No. 9/97 was filed by the respondent herein under Sections, 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the appellant company. According to … M/s. I.T.C. Bhadrachalam Finance and Investments Limited having its registered Office at 817, Tulsiani Chambers, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400021. Presently came down at New

Kailash Chandra Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1986 - Sections 23(3); Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1994Raj177; 1994(1)WLN273

and fees. Realising these difficulties and their monopolistic attitude, State Government issued the said notification under Section 3, Oaths Act, 1969 empowering all Oath Commissioners appointed by the Rajasthan High Court, Rajasthan Board of Revenue, District and Sessions Judges … petition, attention of the learned counsel for the petitioner was invited towards Notification F. 3(40) Jud/77 dated November 8, 1977 issued by the Government of Rajasthan in the Judicial Department, Jaipur, published in Rajasthan Gazette Extraordinary dated

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Deputy Collector and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Maharashtra Increase in Land Revenue and Special Assessment Act, 1974 - Sections 2(1), 3, 4, 6 and 6A; Maharashtra Increase in Land Revenue and Special Assessment (Amendment) Act, 1986; Bombay City (Inami and Special Tenure) Abolition Act, 1969 - Sections 7 and 8; Maharashtra Tax Act (Amendment) Act, 1975; Maharashtra Education (Cess) Act, 1962; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1965; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(4)BomCR468; 2005(3)MhLj1153

the assessment of the lands made under Section 8 of the Bombay City (Inami and Special Tenure) Abolition Act, 1969 is upto the year 2021.3. By the notice dated 04.11.1987 the first respondent called upon the petitioner to

Krishnamoorthy Vs. Sivakumar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

per Section 3(3) of the General Clauses Act, 1897, the conceptual meaning of Oath, Section 8 of The Oaths Act, 1969 and scanned the anatomy of Sections 259 and 260 of the 1994 Act and the principles that have