Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: oaths act 1969 section 7 · Page 1 of about 8,890 results (0.175 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 17 1981

Bal Krishan Julka Vs. K.L. Verma

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-17-1981

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 7; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi19; 20(1981)DLT383; 1981(2)DRJ254

The forms of oaths or affirmations are prescribed and mentioned in the Schedule annexed to the said Act. Section 7 of the Oaths Act, 1969 reads as under : 'NO omission to take any oath or make any … applicable in India, where the Indian Oaths Act, 1873 was in force up to 26th December, 1969, The Oaths act, 1969 came into force from 26th December, 1969 repealing the Act of 1873. The relevant provisions for the purpose

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2008

R. Krishnappa S/O. Ramappa Vs. the State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Secr ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-04-2008

Subject : Election

Acts : Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act - Sections 15, 43, 132, 167, 167(1), 167(2), 168, 168(2), 171 and 172; Bombay Public Trust Act - Sections 37(1); Evidence Act - Sections 3; Karnataka Panchayat Raj Rules; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3, 6, 6(2) and 7

Reported in : ILR2008KAR2185; 2008(3)KarLJ238; 2008(4)KCCRSN249; 2008(2)AIRKarR353; AIR2008NOC1790

to render persons who give false evidence liable to prosecution as is clear from Section 6 of the Oaths Act, 1969. Section 7 of the Oaths Act clarifies that the proceedings will not be invalidated or the evidence will not he

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2000

Sand Plast (India) Ltd. Vs. I.T.C. Bhadrachalam Finance and Investment ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-14-2000

Subject : Company

Acts : Company (court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 2(13), 6, 13, 18, 21, 24, 26, 30, 33, 35, 40, 44, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 54 and 76; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(3), 433, 434, 439, 477, 478, 503, 539, 543, 545, 550, 552, 555, 621, 625, 633 and 643; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 7; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Power of Attorney Act, 1882; Oaths (Amendment) Act, 1873 - Sections 13; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81 and 83; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 139; Notaries Act, 1952; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 46

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas471(Raj); 2001(1)WLC469; 2003(1)WLN594

the rules made thereunder and in particular Rules 6, 18, 21 and 33 and certain provisions of the Oaths Act, 1969, General Clauses Act etc. He also relied on the following judgments reported in:i) Mool Chand Wahi vs. National … (JTC Bhadrachalam Finance & Investment Ltd. Mumbai. Company Petition No. 9/97 was filed by the respondent herein under Sections, 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the appellant company. According to … 6 (Form No.3), Rule 30, Rule 54, Form No. 25 and Rule 76 of the Company (Court) Rules.(14). Sec. 643 of the Companies Act deals

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 10 1975

Smt. Anchi Vs. Balu Ram

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-10-1975

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1975CriLJ1991; 1975()WLN26

the affidavits having been considered the judgements of both the Courts are vitiated and Section 7 of the Oaths Act, 1969 does not cure the defect as the form given in the schedule comes into function after the affidavit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1978

Mahendra Singh Gehlot Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-06-1978

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)357

of the affidavit is of no material significance in view of the provisions of Section 7 of the Oaths Act, 1969, which read as follows:7. Proceedings and evidence not invalidated by omission of oath or irregularity No omission to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2010

P. Giribabu Vs. Deputy Director of Enforcement

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-26-2010

Subject : FEMA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 13, 37, 37(1) and 37(3); ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 131(1), 131(B) and 293; ;Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6(2) and 7; ;Sea Customs Act - Section 171A and 171A(4); ;Indian Oaths Act, 1873; ;Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 30; ;Karnataka Land Reforms Act - Section 20A; ;Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Section 108; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 135(2) - Order 10, Rule 2 - Order 16 - Order 18, Rule 2; ;Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 21

Reported in : [2010]99SCL268(Mad)

Section 37 of FEMA also, the persons summoned have to be examined on oath. Section 7 of the Oaths Act, 1969 provides that what is recorded after administration of Oath is evidence. Income-tax Act provides that examination by an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2001

Bhagwania Vs. State Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-01-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 7; Evidence Act - Sections 118; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3719

oath was not administered to him.21. To understand the above problem, the proviso to Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 must be read along with Section 118 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 7 of the Oaths

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2005

Hanumant Pandurang Indalkar Vs. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-23-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 7; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2006(2)ALLMR630; [2006(109)FLR443]; 2006(2)MhLj583

the Labour Court is not an independent Court within the meaning of the Criminal Procedure Code. Under the Oaths Act, 1969, it was not necessary for the evidence to be recorded on oath before the Labour Court. The learned … followed before the Labour Court which, according to the learned Counsel, is not a Court. He submits that Section 7 of the Oaths Act does not require evidence to be recorded on oath and hence material which were

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 2009

Sandip Arjun Vazarkar Vs. Scrutiny Committee for Verification of Caste ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-15-2009

Subject : Election

Acts : Mazania Act; Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes, (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificates Act, 2000; Goa Panchayat Raj Act - Sections 7 and 16; Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 - Sections 7 and 10; Evidence Act - Sections 101 to 104; Representation of the People Act - Sections 81(1), 81(3), 86 and 114; Goa Panchayat and Zilla Panchayats Rules, 1996; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226, 243D(6) and 243F(1)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR2371

alleged manipulation with regard to Mahadeo Babani Naik to point out provisions of Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, particularly Sections 7 and 10. It is alleged that an employee of a Panchayat like its Secretary can … the State Governments and how separate law of elections for that purpose has been evolved. The provisions of Section 7 of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act have been pointed out to show that its Sub-section (5) again contemplates … names were spelt differently and when the Petitioner/his witnesses have stated on oath that the said person was his grandfather, there is nothing before the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2001

Shri Puhap Singh Alias Shambhu (Dead) Through L.Rs. Smt. Rambai and Ot ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-02-2001

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Oaths Act, 1873 - Sections 9 to 12; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 9; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 20 and 112

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT31; 2002(3)MPLJ136

1873 which contained the provisions relating to special oath in Sections 9 to 12 was repealed by the Oaths Act, 1969 and there was no provision regarding the special oath in the new Act and therefore, the Trial Court … Khare, J. 1. This is a second appeal by defendant No. 2 Puhap Singh alias Shambhu Prasad under Section 100, CPC. The following substantial question of law was formulated by this Court by order dated 26-8-1989 at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial