Advanced Search Results

Hiralal Parbhudas Vs. Ganesh Trading Company and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchsandlse Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 12, 12(3) and 56; Trade and Merchandised Marks Rules, 1959 - Rule 116(1) and 116(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 6; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : AIR1984Bom218

affidavits with the correct heading and which declared before the Executive magistrate, Taluka Bhuj. Section 3(1)(a) of the Oaths Act, 1969 empowers 'all courts and persons having by law authority to receive evidence to administer oath. Section 6 of

Kalu Sanil Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) Represented by Its Secretary, ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 18, Rule 4; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment), 2002; Evidence Act, 1872; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 6(2)

Reported in : ILR2008KAR4734; 2008(4)KCCR2804

is repugnant to the provisions contained under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Act 1 of 1872) and the Oaths Act, 1969; and(ii) to quash the order dated 16.9.2005 made on I.A-IV filed in OS No. 176/1998 on the file … the suit. It is further contended that order 18 Rule 4 of CPC is in direct conflict with Section 6(2) of the Oaths Act as well as the Indian Evidence Act. It is also contended that the

Godekari Ragamma Vs. Vageneni Tirupati and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4, 5 and 6(1); Indian Oaths Act, 1873

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD98; 2000(4)ALT482

learned Counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff relying upon Sections 4, 5 and 6 read with the Schedule of the Oaths Act, 1969 (Act 44 of 1969 - for short 'the New Act') submits that a witness has an option, in … 'the Old Act') clearly recognised this freedom of a witness under Sections 5 and 6 and in fact Section 6 clearly exempts Hindus and Muslims and any person who has an objection to make an oath, from making

Bal Krishan Julka Vs. K.L. Verma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 7; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi19; 20(1981)DLT383; 1981(2)DRJ254

with no order as to costs. Oaths Act, 1969 - Section 7 ; Indian Evidence Act, 1908 - Section 6 ; Failure to take oath or solemn affirmation does not debar a court from acting on the evidence.; … applicable in India, where the Indian Oaths Act, 1873 was in force up to 26th December, 1969, The Oaths act, 1969 came into force from 26th December, 1969 repealing the Act of 1873. The relevant provisions for the purpose

Om Prakash Suthar Vs. the State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012CrLJ2341

parties, perused the orders impugned passed by the learned courts below, the provision of Section 6(1) of the Oaths Act, 1969 and have considered the arguments advanced at the bar. 4. The provision of Section 6(1) of the Oaths

R. Krishnappa S/O. Ramappa Vs. the State of Karnataka Rep. by Its Secr ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Election

Acts : Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act - Sections 15, 43, 132, 167, 167(1), 167(2), 168, 168(2), 171 and 172; Bombay Public Trust Act - Sections 37(1); Evidence Act - Sections 3; Karnataka Panchayat Raj Rules; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3, 6, 6(2) and 7

Reported in : ILR2008KAR2185; 2008(3)KarLJ238; 2008(4)KCCRSN249; 2008(2)AIRKarR353; AIR2008NOC1790

to render persons who give false evidence liable to prosecution as is clear from Section 6 of the Oaths Act, 1969. Section 7 of the Oaths Act clarifies that the proceedings will not be invalidated or the evidence will not

P. Giribabu Vs. Deputy Director of Enforcement

Court : Chennai

Subject : FEMA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 13, 37, 37(1) and 37(3); ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 131(1), 131(B) and 293; ;Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6(2) and 7; ;Sea Customs Act - Section 171A and 171A(4); ;Indian Oaths Act, 1873; ;Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 30; ;Karnataka Land Reforms Act - Section 20A; ;Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Section 108; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 135(2) - Order 10, Rule 2 - Order 16 - Order 18, Rule 2; ;Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 21

Reported in : [2010]99SCL268(Mad)

Section 37 of FEMA also, the persons summoned have to be examined on oath. Section 7 of the Oaths Act, 1969 provides that what is recorded after administration of Oath is evidence. Income-tax Act provides that examination by an … and persons shall have power to administer, by themselves or, subject to the provisions of Sub-section (2) of Section 6, by an officer empowered by them in this behalf, oaths and affirmations in discharge of the duties imposed

Sand Plast (India) Ltd. Vs. I.T.C. Bhadrachalam Finance and Investment ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Company

Acts : Company (court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 2(13), 6, 13, 18, 21, 24, 26, 30, 33, 35, 40, 44, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 54 and 76; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(3), 433, 434, 439, 477, 478, 503, 539, 543, 545, 550, 552, 555, 621, 625, 633 and 643; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 7; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Power of Attorney Act, 1882; Oaths (Amendment) Act, 1873 - Sections 13; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81 and 83; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 139; Notaries Act, 1952; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 46

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas471(Raj); 2001(1)WLC469; 2003(1)WLN594

the rules made thereunder and in particular Rules 6, 18, 21 and 33 and certain provisions of the Oaths Act, 1969, General Clauses Act etc. He also relied on the following judgments reported in:i) Mool Chand Wahi vs. National … (JTC Bhadrachalam Finance & Investment Ltd. Mumbai. Company Petition No. 9/97 was filed by the respondent herein under Sections, 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the appellant company. According to

Shri Puhap Singh Alias Shambhu (Dead) Through L.Rs. Smt. Rambai and Ot ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Oaths Act, 1873 - Sections 9 to 12; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 9; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 20 and 112

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT31; 2002(3)MPLJ136

1873 which contained the provisions relating to special oath in Sections 9 to 12 was repealed by the Oaths Act, 1969 and there was no provision regarding the special oath in the new Act and therefore, the Trial Court … Nos. 1 to 10 filed the written statement. They admitted in para 6 of the written statement that Parvatibai was married wife of defendant No. … Khare, J. 1. This is a second appeal by defendant No. 2 Puhap Singh alias Shambhu Prasad under Section 100, CPC. The following substantial question of law was formulated by this Court by order dated 26-8-1989 at

Sri.sudarshan V Biradar Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

issued by the State Government in exercise of its powers under the Registration of Births and Deaths 3 Act, 1969 (‘the Act’ for short) contending that the amendment is ultra vires the Act.2. Shorn of unnecessary details, facts … deaths are registered after a long delay and therefore, the State Government 6 has brought in this amendment to be in tune with every other … in Rules in furtherance of the Act with the prior approval of the State Government. In terms of Section 30 of the Act, Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1970 was promulgated. The Rules of 1970