Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: oaths act 1969 section 4 · Page 1 of about 8,387 results (0.130 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 18 2005

Dilawarsab Alisab Jakati Vs. State of Karnataka by Its State Public Pr ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-18-2005

Subject : CriminalCivil

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 326, 375, 376, 376(2) and 511; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 5; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 32 and 119; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2005CriLJ2687; ILR2005KAR2282

person can be recorded by signs made in open court and such evidence is admissible'.Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 provides for oaths or affirmation to be made by witnensses, interpreter and jurors, which reads as follows:'4. Oaths

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2000

Godekari Ragamma Vs. Vageneni Tirupati and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-10-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4, 5 and 6(1); Indian Oaths Act, 1873

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD98; 2000(4)ALT482

learned Counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff relying upon Sections 4, 5 and 6 read with the Schedule of the Oaths Act, 1969 (Act 44 of 1969 - for short 'the New Act') submits that a witness has an option, in … report of the Law Commission, the Parliament has enacted the New Act, which has repealed the Old Act. Section 4 of the New Act enjoins, inter alia, that oaths or affirmations shall be made by all witnesses. Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 1981

Rouben Isreal Patter Vs. Mamta and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-30-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Divorce Act, 1896 - Sections 10, 22, 43, 50 and 51; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4(1)

Reported in : AIR1983Kant10; ILR1982KAR819

a child witness under 12 years of age. In this connection, sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 with the proviso is relevent and it is as follows:'4(1) Oaths or affirmation shall be made by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 01 1998

In the Matter Of: Bonneswar Dutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-01-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 437, 438, 438(1) and 439(1);; Oaths Act, 1969 - Section 4(2);; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 20(3) and 226;; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 132;; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22 and 34;; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 147;; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Section 19

Reported in : (1998)1CALLT74(HC),1998(1)CHN123,1998CriLJ1383

filing an affidavit, is that event that would amount to violation of the provisions section 4(2) of the Oaths Act, 1969 which provides as hereunder:'......Nothing is this section shall render it lawful to administer, is a criminal proceeding, an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2004

State of Maharashtra Vs. Gajanan Baburao Phakatkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-07-2004

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 118; Oaths Act, 1897 - Sections 5 and 13; Indian Oaths Act, 1873 - Sections 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 498A

Reported in : I(2005)DMC511

earlier, the learned Judge appears to have administered an oath to the said witness. Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 provides that oath or affirmation shall be made by all witnesses who are required to give evidence before

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2004

Arjun Rai Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Decided on : Apr-01-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Procdeure Code , 1974 - Sections 164(5); Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4747

person (accused). At that stage, we may have a look at Sub-section (2) of Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 which states inter alia that nothing in the said section shall render it lawful to administer, in a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 1992

Kabiraj Tudu Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-31-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 165 and 118; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299, 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 165, 172(2), 173 and 174

body or mind, or any other cause of the same kind. Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 mandates that oath or affirmation shall be made by the persons indicated in Clauses (a), (b) and (c),

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2005

State of Jharkhand Vs. Dasrath Sao and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-29-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 118; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 118; ;Constitution of India - Article 136; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 449; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 366(A)

Reported in : [2006(1)JCR152(Jhr)]

duty of the Court to hold preliminary examination under Section 118 read with Section 4 Proviso of the Oaths Act, 1969, but absence of such examination does not make his evidence inadmissible and the appellate Court or trial Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2001

Bhagwania Vs. State Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-01-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 7; Evidence Act - Sections 118; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3719

oath was not administered to him.21. To understand the above problem, the proviso to Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 must be read along with Section 118 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 7 of the Oaths

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2000

Sand Plast (India) Ltd. Vs. I.T.C. Bhadrachalam Finance and Investment ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-14-2000

Subject : Company

Acts : Company (court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 2(13), 6, 13, 18, 21, 24, 26, 30, 33, 35, 40, 44, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 54 and 76; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(3), 433, 434, 439, 477, 478, 503, 539, 543, 545, 550, 552, 555, 621, 625, 633 and 643; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 7; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Power of Attorney Act, 1882; Oaths (Amendment) Act, 1873 - Sections 13; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81 and 83; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 139; Notaries Act, 1952; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 46

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas471(Raj); 2001(1)WLC469; 2003(1)WLN594

the rules made thereunder and in particular Rules 6, 18, 21 and 33 and certain provisions of the Oaths Act, 1969, General Clauses Act etc. He also relied on the following judgments reported in:i) Mool Chand Wahi vs. National … (JTC Bhadrachalam Finance & Investment Ltd. Mumbai. Company Petition No. 9/97 was filed by the respondent herein under Sections, 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the appellant company. According to … Company Petition No. 9/97 was filed by the respondent herein under Sections, 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial