Advanced Search Results
Dilawarsab Alisab Jakati Vs. State of Karnataka by Its State Public Pr ...
Karnataka
Feb-18-2005
CriminalCivil
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 326, 375, 376, 376(2) and 511; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 5; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 32 and 119; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
2005CriLJ2687; ILR2005KAR2282
person can be recorded by signs made in open court and such evidence is admissible'.Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 provides for oaths or affirmation to be made by witnensses, interpreter and jurors, which reads as follows:'4. Oaths
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGodekari Ragamma Vs. Vageneni Tirupati and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-10-2000
Civil
Indian Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4, 5 and 6(1); Indian Oaths Act, 1873
2000(5)ALD98; 2000(4)ALT482
learned Counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff relying upon Sections 4, 5 and 6 read with the Schedule of the Oaths Act, 1969 (Act 44 of 1969 - for short 'the New Act') submits that a witness has an option, in … report of the Law Commission, the Parliament has enacted the New Act, which has repealed the Old Act. Section 4 of the New Act enjoins, inter alia, that oaths or affirmations shall be made by all witnesses. Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRouben Isreal Patter Vs. Mamta and anr.
Karnataka
Nov-30-1981
Civil
Divorce Act, 1896 - Sections 10, 22, 43, 50 and 51; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4(1)
AIR1983Kant10; ILR1982KAR819
a child witness under 12 years of age. In this connection, sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 with the proviso is relevent and it is as follows:'4(1) Oaths or affirmation shall be made by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
In the Matter Of: Bonneswar Dutta and ors.
Kolkata
Jan-01-1998
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 437, 438, 438(1) and 439(1);; Oaths Act, 1969 - Section 4(2);; Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 20(3) and 226;; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 132;; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22 and 34;; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 147;; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Section 19
(1998)1CALLT74(HC),1998(1)CHN123,1998CriLJ1383
filing an affidavit, is that event that would amount to violation of the provisions section 4(2) of the Oaths Act, 1969 which provides as hereunder:'......Nothing is this section shall render it lawful to administer, is a criminal proceeding, an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Gajanan Baburao Phakatkar
Mumbai
Sep-07-2004
CriminalFamily
Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 118; Oaths Act, 1897 - Sections 5 and 13; Indian Oaths Act, 1873 - Sections 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 498A
I(2005)DMC511
earlier, the learned Judge appears to have administered an oath to the said witness. Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 provides that oath or affirmation shall be made by all witnesses who are required to give evidence before
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArjun Rai Vs. State of Sikkim
Sikkim
Apr-01-2004
Criminal
Criminal Procdeure Code , 1974 - Sections 164(5); Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300
2004CriLJ4747
person (accused). At that stage, we may have a look at Sub-section (2) of Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 which states inter alia that nothing in the said section shall render it lawful to administer, in a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKabiraj Tudu Vs. State of Assam
Guwahati
Aug-31-1992
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 165 and 118; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299, 300, 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 165, 172(2), 173 and 174
body or mind, or any other cause of the same kind. Sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 mandates that oath or affirmation shall be made by the persons indicated in Clauses (a), (b) and (c),
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Jharkhand Vs. Dasrath Sao and ors.
Jharkhand
Jun-29-2005
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 118; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 118; ;Constitution of India - Article 136; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 449; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 366(A)
[2006(1)JCR152(Jhr)]
duty of the Court to hold preliminary examination under Section 118 read with Section 4 Proviso of the Oaths Act, 1969, but absence of such examination does not make his evidence inadmissible and the appellate Court or trial Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagwania Vs. State Rajasthan
Rajasthan
May-01-2001
Criminal
Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 7; Evidence Act - Sections 118; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
2001CriLJ3719
oath was not administered to him.21. To understand the above problem, the proviso to Section 4 of the Oaths Act, 1969 must be read along with Section 118 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 7 of the Oaths
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSand Plast (India) Ltd. Vs. I.T.C. Bhadrachalam Finance and Investment ...
Rajasthan
Dec-14-2000
Company
Company (court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 2(13), 6, 13, 18, 21, 24, 26, 30, 33, 35, 40, 44, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 54 and 76; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(3), 433, 434, 439, 477, 478, 503, 539, 543, 545, 550, 552, 555, 621, 625, 633 and 643; Oaths Act, 1969 - Sections 4 and 7; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Power of Attorney Act, 1882; Oaths (Amendment) Act, 1873 - Sections 13; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81 and 83; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 139; Notaries Act, 1952; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 46
[2002]111CompCas471(Raj); 2001(1)WLC469; 2003(1)WLN594
the rules made thereunder and in particular Rules 6, 18, 21 and 33 and certain provisions of the Oaths Act, 1969, General Clauses Act etc. He also relied on the following judgments reported in:i) Mool Chand Wahi vs. National … (JTC Bhadrachalam Finance & Investment Ltd. Mumbai. Company Petition No. 9/97 was filed by the respondent herein under Sections, 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the appellant company. According to … Company Petition No. 9/97 was filed by the respondent herein under Sections, 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »